52 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1949–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beck v. Beckgreen2 sentences2015Id. (citing Beck v. Beck. 814 S.W.2d 745 (Tex. 1991) at 748-49. 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 603 (Tex. 1991). cert, denied. 498 U.S. 1048 . 112 L. 2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh’g)). | 5 | 6 |
United States v. Bobby Ray McCaskey A/K/A Snake and Lionel Legard A/K/A Maxgreen2 sentences2008The policies to be served by the doctrine of judicial estoppel include “preventing internal inconsistency, precluding litigants from playing fast and loose with the courts, and prohibiting parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment.” U.S. v. McCaskey, 9 F.3d 368, 378 (5th Cir.1993). 2008The policies to be served by the doctrine of judicial estoppel include “preventing internal inconsistency, precluding litigants from playing fast and loose with the courts, and prohibiting parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment.” U.S. v. McCaskey , 9 F.3d 368, 378 (5 th Cir. 1993). | 5 | 5 |
DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.green2 sentences2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh’g)). 2004Id . (citing Beck v. Beck , 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex. 1991), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 1048 (1991); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp. , 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex. 1990) (op. on reh’g)). | 4 | 5 |
Nexen Inc. v. Gulf Interstate Engineering Co.green2 sentences2011See id. § 187 cmt. d; Nexen Inc. v. Gulf Interstate Eng’g Co., 224 S.W.3d 412, 420 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). 2011See id. § 187 cmt. d; Nexen Inc. v. Gulf Interstate Eng’g Co., 224 S.W.3d 412, 420 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc.red2 sentences2002However, in Lawrence v. CDB Servs ., Inc. , 44 S.W.3d 544, 551-53 (Tex. 2001), the Supreme Court disapproved the public policy analysis employed by the Fourth Court of Appeals, finding fault with its substantive plan-by-plan comparison of respective benefits. 2002However, in Laurrence v. CDB Servs., Inc., 44 S.W.3d 544, 551-58 (Tex.2001), the Supreme Court disapproved the public policy analysis employed by the Fourth Court of Appeals, finding fault with its substantive plan-by-plan comparison of respective benefits. | 3 | 3 |
Nevada v. Hallred2 sentences2015In Nevada v. Hall, the Supreme Court recognized a public-policy exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the extent Congress does not prescribe otherwise. 440 U.S. 410, 421-22 , 99 S.Ct. 1182 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979) (“[T]his Court’s decision in Pacific Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 306 U.S. 493 , 59 S.Ct. 629 , 83 L.Ed. 940 , clearly establishes that the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State’s law in violation of its own legitimate public policy.”). 2015In Nevada v. Hall, the Supreme Court recognized a public-policy exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the extent Congress does not prescribe otherwise. 440 U.S. 410, 421-22 , 99 S.Ct. 1182 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979) (“[T]his Court’s decision in Pacific Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 306 U.S. 493 , 59 S.Ct. 629 , 83 L.Ed. 940 , clearly establishes that the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State’s law in violation of its own legitimate public policy.”). | 2 | 2 |
McClendon v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.green2 sentences1994The Texas Supreme Court's decision in McClendon, 779 S.W.2d at 69 , reversed in Ingersoll-Rand v. McClendon, 498 U.S. 133 , 111 S.Ct. 478 , 112 L.Ed.2d 474 (1990), was an attempt to expand the narrow public policy exception to hold that the at-will doctrine does not bar employees from recovering damages if they can prove that the employer fired them to avoid paying benefits under a pension plan. 1991This court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals and remanded the case for trial, holding that McClendon’s allegations were sufficient to state a wrongful discharge claim against Ingersoll-Rand under a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. 779 S.W.2d 69 . | 1 | 4 |
Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauckgreen2 sentences1993Sands is urging this Court to extend the protection of the public policy exception to the employment at-will doctrine announced in Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck , 687 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex. 1985), to cover contractual relationships between independent contractors and those parties contracting for their services. 1990The supreme court stated that where an employee sought to invoke the public policy exception, “it is the plaintiff’s burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.” Id. | 1 | 4 |
In Re AVgreen2 sentences2002V ., 57 S.W.3d 51 , 60 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, pet. filed) (the public policy exception validates a retroactive law which is necessary to safeguard public safety and welfare). 2002See also In re A. V., 57 S.W.3d 51 , 60 (Tex. App.-Waco 2001, pet. filed) (the public policy exception validates a retroactive law which is necessary to safeguard public safety and welfare). | 1 | 2 |
Richard Patrick Feemster, Sr. v. Bj-Titan Services Co./titan Services, Inc.green1 sentence2018See 873 F.2d at 93 -94 . | 1 | 1 |
Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.green1 sentence2015Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1062 (9th Cir. 2011), that a public policy exception to enforcing confidentiality agreements may have “some merit” under the Act. | 1 | 1 |
CVN Group, Inc. v. Delgadogreen1 sentence2015See CVN Grp., 95 S.W.3d at 239 . 2. | 1 | 1 |
Holyfield v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.green1 sentence2014Armendariz, 112 S.W.3d at 739 ; Conlin, 828 S.W.2d at 334–37; see, e.g., Holyfield, 572 S.W.2d at 11 673; McKinnon, 823 S.W.2d at 347 ; Moore v. State Farm Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreetgreen2 sentences2012Compare Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561 , 335 N.W.2d 834, 841 (1983) (contract), and Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130 , 316 A.2d 549, 551 (1974) (same), with Thompson v. St. 2012Compare Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561 , 335 N.W.2d 834, 841 (1983) (contract), and Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130 , 316 A.2d 549, 551 (1974) (same), with Thompson v. St. | 1 | 1 |
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.green2 sentences2012Compare Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561 , 335 N.W.2d 834, 841 (1983) (contract), and Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130 , 316 A.2d 549, 551 (1974) (same), with Thompson v. St. 2012Compare Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561 , 335 N.W.2d 834, 841 (1983) (contract), and Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130 , 316 A.2d 549, 551 (1974) (same), with Thompson v. St. | 1 | 1 |
| Sheets v. Knightgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand Forksgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Nice v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Heslop v. Bank of Utahgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Mason v. Richmond Motor Co., Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Edelman v. Franklin Iron & Metal Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Roberts v. Holland & Hartgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Pool v. Ford Motor Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Booth v. Chadwickgreen | 1 | 1 |
| O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Salanger v. U.S. Airgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Runge v. Franklingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Breen v. Commissioner
green
2 sentences2015Id. (citing Beck v. Beck. 814 S.W.2d 745 (Tex. 1991) at 748-49. 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 603 (Tex. 1991). cert, denied. 498 U.S. 1048 . 112 L. 2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh’g)). | 4 | 2004–2015 |
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'n
green
2 sentences2015In Nevada v. Hall, the Supreme Court recognized a public-policy exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the extent Congress does not prescribe otherwise. 440 U.S. 410, 421-22 , 99 S.Ct. 1182 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979) (“[T]his Court’s decision in Pacific Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 306 U.S. 493 , 59 S.Ct. 629 , 83 L.Ed. 940 , clearly establishes that the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State’s law in violation of its own legitimate public policy.”). 2015In Nevada v. Hall, the Supreme Court recognized a public-policy exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the extent Congress does not prescribe otherwise. 440 U.S. 410, 421-22 , 99 S.Ct. 1182 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979) (“[T]his Court’s decision in Pacific Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 306 U.S. 493 , 59 S.Ct. 629 , 83 L.Ed. 940 , clearly establishes that the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State’s law in violation of its own legitimate public policy.”). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Pocono Green, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences2015Id. (citing Beck v. Beck. 814 S.W.2d 745 (Tex. 1991) at 748-49. 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 603 (Tex. 1991). cert, denied. 498 U.S. 1048 . 112 L. 2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh’g)). | 2 | 2004–2015 |
Vinson & Elkins v. Moran
green
2 sentences2015Vinson & Elkins v. Moran, 946 SW 2d 381 (Tex.App. 2015Vinson & Elkins v. Moran, 946 SW 2d 381 (Tex.App. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District
green
2 sentences2001Barshop, 925 S.W.2d at 633-34 . 2001Barshop, 925 S.W.2d at 633-34 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Marion v. Davis
green
1 sentence2015The public policy exception was reiterated in Marion v. Davis, 106 S.W.3d 860 . 869 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003. pet, denied.], in which it was stated that [E]very person has the right to dispose of his property by will as he sees fit, regardless of how the property is distributed in 13 the will. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Perry v. Rogers
neutral
1 sentence2015Gunter v. Pogue, 672 S. W.2d840 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi 1984), writ refdn.r.e.); Perry v. Rogers, 52 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. McKinnon
green
1 sentence2014Armendariz, 112 S.W.3d at 739 ; Conlin, 828 S.W.2d at 334–37; see, e.g., Holyfield, 572 S.W.2d at 11 673; McKinnon, 823 S.W.2d at 347 ; Moore v. State Farm Mut. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Huey v. Huey
green
1 sentence2014In support of this argument real party in interest points the Court to its decision in Huey v. Huey, 200 S.W.3d 851 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, no pet.). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Conlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2014Armendariz, 112 S.W.3d at 739 ; Conlin, 828 S.W.2d at 334–37; see, e.g., Holyfield, 572 S.W.2d at 11 673; McKinnon, 823 S.W.2d at 347 ; Moore v. State Farm Mut. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Armendariz v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2014Armendariz, 112 S.W.3d at 739 ; Conlin, 828 S.W.2d at 334–37; see, e.g., Holyfield, 572 S.W.2d at 11 673; McKinnon, 823 S.W.2d at 347 ; Moore v. State Farm Mut. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Mendoza, 606 SW.2d at 694 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Standard Oil Co.
green
1 sentence2006In reliance on State v. Standard Oil Co. , 107 S.W.2d 550 (Tex. 1937), DRG argues that enforcing the forum-selection clause, by requiring that the respondent yield to the Southern District of Texas, would contravene the public policy of this State, which prohibits multiple lawsuits premised on the same transaction. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Alma Investments, Inc. v. Bahia Mar Co-Owners Ass'n green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Hegedus v. Limbach
green
2 sentences2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh’g)). 2004Id. (citing Beck v. Beck, 814 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Tex.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S.907, 112 S.Ct. 1266 , 117 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 681-82 (Tex.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1048 , 111 S.Ct. 755 , 112 L.Ed.2d 775 (1991) (op. on reh'g)). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Chez Sez III Corp. v. Township of Union green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Beck v. Beck green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Wieder v. Skala green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Cain v. Bain green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Maus v. National Living Centers, Inc. green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Vnuk v. Patterson green | 1 | 1951–1951 |
| Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. Capps green | 1 | 1949–1949 |
| Griggs Canning Co. v. Josey green | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.