6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1898–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cadillac Cowboy, Inc. v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2004Cadillac Cowboy, 347 Ark. at 970 , 69 S.W.3d 383 . 2004Cadillac Cowboy, 347 Ark. at 970 , 69 S.W.3d 383 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Yandell v. State
neutral
2 sentences1993In Yandell v. State, 262 Ark. 195 , 555 S.W.2d 561 (1977) we were asked to overturn the ruling of the trial court permitting a physician from Mexico to give expert medical testimony, although unlicensed in the United States. 1993In Yandell v. State, 262 Ark. 195 , 555 S.W.2d 561 (1977) we were asked to overturn the ruling of the trial court permitting a physician from Mexico to give expert medical testimony, although unlicensed in the United States. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Prellwitz v. Cromwell, Truemper, Levy, Parker & Woodsmale, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993Parker does not challenge the qualifications or expertise of Ledbetter within the scope of his testimony, rather, he urges that we should adopt the same standard for expert witnesses as in Prellwitz, supra. We are not persuaded by the argument, as we believe it would be a departure from the rule announced in our previous cases. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Williams v. State
neutral
2 sentences1990App. 23 , 770 S.W.2d 666 (1989), stating that it is a departure from the rule announced in Williams v. State, 24 Ark. 1990App. 118 , 748 S.W.2d 355 (1988). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Doby v. State
green
1 sentence1990App. 23 , 770 S.W.2d 666 (1989), stating that it is a departure from the rule announced in Williams v. State, 24 Ark. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Deidrich v. Simmons
neutral
2 sentences1968Appellant mainly relies on our case of Deidrech v. Simmons, 75 Ark. 400 , 87 S. W. 649 , where these requirements are not specifically mentioned, and it is said that an agreement may he inferred from long continued acquiescence and occupation, thus binding the parties. 1968Appellant mainly relies on our case of Deidrech v. Simmons, 75 Ark. 400 , 87 S. W. 649 , where these requirements are not specifically mentioned, and it is said that an agreement may he inferred from long continued acquiescence and occupation, thus binding the parties. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Earl v. Harris
neutral
1 sentence1916They were merely explanatory of the instruction as requested by counsel for the plaintiffs and in no sense contained a departure from the rule of law governing the- construction of deeds like this as laid down in the case of Earl v. Harris, supra, and cur other cases relating to the questions. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Trimble v. James
neutral
1 sentence1898Trimble v. James, 40 Ark. 393 . | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.