6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1926–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Burkgreen2 sentences2018See Burk, 124 Nev. at 597 , 188 P.3d at 1124 ; Nettles v. Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C., --- So. 3d ----, 2018 WL 4174681 (Ala. Aug. 31, 2018) (overruling prior case law construing Alabama Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and adopting the Supreme Court's decision in Hall ). 2018See Burk, 124 Nev. at 597 , 188 P.3d at 1124 ; Nettles v. Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C., --- So. 3d ----, 2018 WL 4174681 (Ala. Aug. 31, 2018) (overruling prior case law construing Alabama Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and adopting the Supreme Court's decision in Hall ). | 3 | 3 |
Crump v. Wardengreen2 sentences2016The special rules afforded postconviction petitioners sentenced to death—the statutory right to the appointment of first postconviction counsel, NRS 34.820, and the right to the effective assistance of that counsel, Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303 , 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159 , 165 n.5, 912 P.2d 255 , 258 n.5 (1996)— SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 32 (0) 1947A .70119 are a departure from the rule that otherwise limits habeas corpus petitioners to one time through the system. 2016The special rules afforded postconviction petitioners sentenced to death—the statutory right to the appointment of first postconviction counsel, NRS 34.820, and the right to the effective assistance of that counsel, Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303 , 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159 , 165 n.5, 912 P.2d 255 , 258 n.5 (1996)— SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 32 (0) 1947A .70119 are a departure from the rule that otherwise limits habeas corpus petitioners to one time through the system. | 1 | 1 |
Clem v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See id. at 630 , 173 P.3d at 729 (noting that federal courts have adopted exception to law-of-the-case doctrine when there has been an intervening change in controlling law). | 1 | 1 |
Tien Fu Hsu v. County of Clarkgreen1 sentence2014See id. at 630 , 173 P.3d at 729 (noting that federal courts have adopted exception to law-of-the-case doctrine when there has been an intervening change in controlling law). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKague v. Whitley
green
2 sentences2016The special rules afforded postconviction petitioners sentenced to death—the statutory right to the appointment of first postconviction counsel, NRS 34.820, and the right to the effective assistance of that counsel, Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303 , 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159 , 165 n.5, 912 P.2d 255 , 258 n.5 (1996)— SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 32 (0) 1947A .70119 are a departure from the rule that otherwise limits habeas corpus petitioners to one time through the system. 2016The special rules afforded postconviction petitioners sentenced to death—the statutory right to the appointment of first postconviction counsel, NRS 34.820, and the right to the effective assistance of that counsel, Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303 , 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159 , 165 n.5, 912 P.2d 255 , 258 n.5 (1996)— SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 32 (0) 1947A .70119 are a departure from the rule that otherwise limits habeas corpus petitioners to one time through the system. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Sharon v. Minnock
green
1 sentence1926Sharon v. Minnock, supra. We see. no reason for a departure from the rule in this case. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.