6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kirksey v. Stategreen2 sentences2021Id. at 987-88, 923 P.2d at 1107. 2021Id. at 987-88, 923 P.2d at 1107 . | 1 | 1 |
Johanson v. Eighth Judicial District Courtgreen2 sentences2020See Johanson, 124 Nev. at 251-52 , 182 P.3d at 98 (concluding that the prior restraint failed under the first prong as a matter of law because the activity restrained had "no apparent bearing on . . . any . . . protected interest"). 2020See Johanson, 124 Nev. at 251-52 , 182 P.3d at 98 (concluding that the prior restraint failed under the first prong as a matter of law because the activity restrained had "no apparent bearing on . . . any . . . protected interest"). | 1 | 1 |
Azbill v. Stategreen2 sentences1996Frutiger, 111 Nev. at 1389 , 907 P.2d at 160 ; Azbill v. State, 84 Nev. 345, 350-51 , 440 P.2d 1014, 1017 (1968). 1996Frutiger, 111 Nev. at 1389 , 907 P.2d at 160 ; Azbill v. State, 84 Nev. 345, 350-51 , 440 P.2d 1014, 1017 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MacKintosh v. Jack Matthews and Co.
green
2 sentences1997Mackintosh I, 109 Nev. at 635 , 855 P.2d at 554 . 1997Mackintosh I, 109 Nev. at 635 , 855 P.2d at 554 . | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Ellis v. Carucci
green
2 sentences2014The first prong of this test is based on preclusion principles, and thus district courts that consider motions for custodial modifications are duty bound to stringently enforce it, see id. at 151 , 161 P.3d at 243 , and it is incumbent on this court to ensure that "the district court . .. reached its conclusions for the appropriate reasons" on review. 2014The first prong of this test is based on preclusion principles, and thus district courts that consider motions for custodial modifications are duty bound to stringently enforce it, see id. at 151 , 161 P.3d at 243 , and it is incumbent on this court to ensure that "the district court . .. reached its conclusions for the appropriate reasons" on review. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Frutiger v. State
green
2 sentences1996Frutiger, 111 Nev. at 1389 , 907 P.2d at 160 ; Azbill v. State, 84 Nev. 345, 350-51 , 440 P.2d 1014, 1017 (1968). 1996Frutiger, 111 Nev. at 1389 , 907 P.2d at 160 ; Azbill v. State, 84 Nev. 345, 350-51 , 440 P.2d 1014, 1017 (1968). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.