Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1898–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Weeks v. United Statesred2 sentences2005See Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). 2005See Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Seamster v. State
green
2 sentences2009This court rejected his argument, concluding that the requirement to complete RSVP was a term of his SIS, noting that the “Terms/Conditions of Disposition” that listed the terms of the SIS, including an explicit requirement for him to “enroll in and complete RSVP program prior to being released from [the Arkansas Department of Correction].” Seamster, 2009 Ark. 258, ¶ 6 , 308 S.W.3d at 571 . 2009This court rejected his argument, concluding that the requirement to complete RSVP was a term of his SIS, noting that the “Terms/Conditions of Disposition” that listed the terms of the SIS, including an explicit requirement for him to “enroll in and complete RSVP program prior to being released from [the Arkansas Department of Correction].” Seamster, 2009 Ark. 258, ¶ 6 , 308 S.W.3d at 571 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Donaldson v. State
green
2 sentences2009Code Ann. § 5-4-104 (a) (Repl.2006), and a sentence is void or illegal when the trial court lacks the authority to impose it, Donaldson v. State, 370 Ark. 3 , 257 S.W.3d 74 (2007). 2009Code Ann. § 5-4-104 (a) (Repl.2006), and a sentence is void or illegal when the trial court lacks the authority to impose it, Donaldson v. State, 370 Ark. 3 , 257 S.W.3d 74 (2007). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cope v. State
green
2 sentences1992Cope v. State, 293 Ark. 524 , 739 S.W.2d 533 (1987). 1992Cope v. State, 293 Ark. 524 , 739 S.W.2d 533 (1987). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Edwards v. Baltimore Fire Insurance
green
1 sentence1898Co., 3 Gill 176 , in reference to which, as implying a waiver, the court of appeals said that it repelled every presumption of any waiver on the part of the company, and was an explicit warning and annunciation to the insured that they designed to waive nothing, and that, on the trial of any action which he might institute against them, must come prepared to prove everything which, according to the terms and conditions of the policy, it was • necessary to prove, to entitle him to recover. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.