5 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rothbart v. Rothbartgreen1 sentence2025See Rothbart, 141 N.H. at 76 (describing Hodgins as a “default formula”). | 1 | 1 |
State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentinogreen1 sentence2016See State v. Carpentino, 166 N.H. 9, 13-14, 19-20 , cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2709 (2014). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2016See State v. Carpentino, 166 N.H. 9, 13-14, 19-20 , cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2709 (2014). | 1 | 1 |
Fischer v. Hoopergreen1 sentence2014See Fischer v. Hooper, 143 N.H. 585, 588 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Holiday v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2014See Holiday, 683 A.2d at 67-70 (analyzing these cases). | 1 | 1 |
Brady v. Durangreen2 sentences1982See id. at 275 , 372 A.2d at 285 . 1982See id. at 275 , 372 A.2d at 285 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Costagreen1 sentence2025But cf., In the Matter of Costa & Costa, 156 N.H. 323, 325, 330-31 (2007) (vacating division of husband’s retirement benefits in case where husband’s employment began in 1987 and the parties married in 1992, and remanding with instruction that if “buyout is not a feasible option . . . the trial court should enter a decree . . . per Hodgins”). [¶14] We now clarify that Hodgins continues to provide the default rule for cases where, as in Hodgins, no portion of the pension was earned prior to marriage. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chatman v. Brady
green
1 sentence2014Chatman, 162 N.H. at 365 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.