168 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1941–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2018See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; State v. Jyles , 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton , 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 . 2018See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; State v. Jyles , 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton , 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 . | 6 | 6 |
State v. Captvillegreen2 sentences2016Standard of Review In accordance with Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 , (1979), we must determine whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is “sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La. 1984). 2014When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, this court is controlled by the standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), which dictates that to affirm a conviction “the appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La.1984). |4In addition, when circums | 2 | 2 |
| Steeg v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporationgreen | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP.green2 sentences2012Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512, p. 26 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 730, 750 (holding that a | %de novo standard applies in reviewing a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment); Fortier v. Hughes, 09-0180, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/17/09), 15 So.3d 1185, 1186 (holding that “[pjeremptory exceptions raising the objection of no right of action are reviewed de novo on appeal as they involve questions of law.”) The sole issue on appeal is whether the WCJ erred in granting the State’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Guardsmen lack a right of action under La. 2008Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 730 . | 1 | 2 |
Stobart v. State Through DOTDgreen2 sentences1999Stobart v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993). 1995For a complete discussion of the standard of appellate review, see Stobart v. State, DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993). | 1 | 2 |
| Evans v. Lungringreen | 1 | 1 |
| Fortier v. Hughesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Tuckergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences1998Discussion The defendant has raised several trial errors as well as alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support a guilty verdict, contending that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had any connection to or even knew of the drugs in the Yarborough St. house. [1] Under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the proper standard of appellate review for a sufficiency of evidence claim is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential 1998Discussion The defendant has raised several trial errors as well as alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support a guilty verdict, contending that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had any connection to or even knew of the drugs in the Yarborough St. house. [1] Under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the proper standard of appellate review for a sufficiency of evidence claim is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential | 14 | 1998–2025 |
State v. Jyles
green
2 sentences2017DISCUSSION The defendant’s appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, alleging that he could find no nonfrivolous issues to appeal, as per Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 ; and State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La. 2016The brief also contains “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” Jyles, supra. Defense counsel further has verified that he has mailed copies of the motion to withdraw and his brief to the defendant, in accordance with Anders, Jyles, Mouton, and Benjamin, supra. J^DISCUSSION An error patent review of the appellate record has been conducted and no errors patent were found. | 9 | 2010–2018 |
State v. Mouton
green
2 sentences2018See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; State v. Jyles , 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton , 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 . 2017DISCUSSION The defendant’s appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, alleging that he could find no nonfrivolous issues to appeal, as per Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 ; and State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La. | 8 | 2007–2018 |
State v. Benjamin
green
2 sentences2017DISCUSSION The defendant’s appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, alleging that he could find no nonfrivolous issues to appeal, as per Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 ; and State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La. 2016The brief also contains “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” Jyles, supra. Defense counsel further has verified that he has mailed copies of the motion to withdraw and his brief to the defendant, in accordance with Anders, Jyles, Mouton, and Benjamin, supra. J^DISCUSSION An error patent review of the appellate record has been conducted and no errors patent were found. | 7 | 2007–2017 |
Kay v. Carter
green
2 sentences2011Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Jones v. Airport Systems Int’l, 28,278 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/3/96), 671 So.2d 1176 . 2011Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Jones v. Airport Systems Int’l, 28,278 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/3/96), 671 So.2d 1176 . | 7 | 1992–2011 |
Jones v. Estate of Santiago
green
2 sentences2007Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 03-1424 (La.4/14/04), 870 So.2d 1002 . 2007Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 03-1424 (La.4/14/04), 870 So.2d 1002 . | 4 | 2007–2007 |
Rosell v. Esco
green
2 sentences2007A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong.” Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989). 2007A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong.” Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989). | 4 | 1996–2007 |
Jones v. Airport Systems Intern.
neutral
2 sentences2011Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Jones v. Airport Systems Int’l, 28,278 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/3/96), 671 So.2d 1176 . 2004Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Jones v. Airport Systems Int'l, 28,278 (La.App.2d Cir.4/3/96), 671 So.2d 1176 . | 3 | 2000–2011 |
Arceneaux v. Domingue
green
2 sentences2010Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978). 2009Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978). | 3 | 1997–2010 |
Olivier v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. 1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. | 3 | 1988–1992 |
Blanchard v. Reeves
green
2 sentences1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. 1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. | 3 | 1988–1992 |
Blanchard v. Reeves
neutral
2 sentences1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. 1992For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). [4] For a discussion of waiver of abandonment by a party defendant once the time has run under LSA-C.C.P. | 3 | 1988–1992 |
ST. PIERRE'S FABRICATION & WELD., INC. v. McNamara
green
2 sentences2018Pierre's Fabrication and Welding, Inc. v. McNamara , 495 So.2d 1295 (La.1986) ): Judicial review of a decision of the Board is rendered upon the record as made up before the Board and is limited to facts on the record and questions of law. 1989Pierre's Fabrication and Welding, Inc. v. McNamara, 495 So.2d 1295 (La.1986). | 2 | 1989–2018 |
Schultz v. Guoth
green
2 sentences2016Schultz v. Guoth, 2010-0343 (La.01/19/11), 57 So.3d 1002 ; Bilyeu v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. 2016Schultz v. Guoth, 2010-0343 (La.01/19/11), 57 So.3d 1002 , and citations therein. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So.2d 1234 (La.1993); Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, LLC, 46,434 (La.App.2d Cir.08/10/11), 71 So.3d 1128 . 2013Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, LLC, 46,434 (La.App.2d Cir.8/10/11), 71 So.3d 1128 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Brown
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Robertson v. Casual Corner Group, Inc
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Coar v. MacFarland Administrator, South Woods State Prison
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
State v. Tate
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2012Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . 2011Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Carter, 42,894 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), 974 So.2d 181 , writ denied, 08-0499 (La.11/14/08), 996 So.2d 1086 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Johnson v. Brown
green
2 sentences2008Johnson v. Brown, 03-0679, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/25/03), 851 So.2d 319, 322 . 2008Johnson v. Brown, 03-0679, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/25/03), 851 So.2d 319, 322 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2007State v. Johnson, supra. Discussion The defendant argues that the mandatory life sentence in this case is constitutionally excessive and the trial court should have made a downward departure in sentencing. 2000DISCUSSION At issue in these cases is the same issue we addressed in State v. Johnson, supra , that is, under what rare circumstances is a sentence lower than the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law required to be imposed because imposition of the mandatory sentence would be excessive under the Louisiana Constitution. | 2 | 2000–2007 |
Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin
green
2 sentences2006Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), 837 So.2d 1207 ; Grocery Supply Co. v. Winterton Food Stores, 31,114 (La.App.2d Cir.12/9/98), 722 So.2d 94 , re hearing denied. 2004Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), 837 So.2d 1207, 1213 . | 2 | 2004–2006 |
Brown v. International Paper Company
neutral
2 sentences2005Brown v. International Paper Co., 38,892 (La.App. 2d Cir.9/22/04), 882 So.2d 1228 , writ denied, 2004-2865 (La.1/28/05), 893 So.2d 78 . 2005Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Brown v. International Paper Co., 38,892 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/22/04), 882 So.2d 1228 , writ denied, 2004-2865 (La.1/28/05), 893 So.2d 78 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Brown v. International Paper Co.
neutral
2 sentences2005Brown v. International Paper Co., 38,892 (La.App. 2d Cir.9/22/04), 882 So.2d 1228 , writ denied, 2004-2865 (La.1/28/05), 893 So.2d 78 . 2005Kay v. Carter, 243 La. 1095 , 150 So.2d 27 (1963); Brown v. International Paper Co., 38,892 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/22/04), 882 So.2d 1228 , writ denied, 2004-2865 (La.1/28/05), 893 So.2d 78 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Hall neutral | 2 | 1994–1996 |
| State v. Hall green | 2 | 1994–1996 |
| State v. Tully green | 2 | 1990–1991 |
| State v. McKethan green | 2 | 1990–1991 |
| State v. Korman green | 2 | 1985–1985 |
| Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc. green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Jackson v. City of New Orleans green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| State v. Dorthey green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| South Lafourche Levee District v. Chad M. Jarreau green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| International Paper, Inc. v. Bridges green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Willis v. Medders green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| State v. Chatman neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Huntington v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.