discussion doctrine in Washington

23 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Salstrom's Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehiclesgreen wash · 1976 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979 2 sentences 1979Salstrom's Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 87 Wn.2d 686, 690 , 555 P.2d 1361, 1365 (1976). 1979Salstrom's Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 87 Wn.2d 686, 690 , 555 P.2d 1361, 1365 (1976).	1	1
Memel v. Reimergreen wash · 1975 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel. 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel.	1	1
Lemon v. Kurtzmangreen scotus · 1973 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel. 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel.	1	1
Chrobuck v. Snohomish Countygreen wash · 1971 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 2 sentences 1975See a discussion of this principle in the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Neill in Chrobuck v. Snohomish County, 78 Wn.2d 858 , 480 P.2d 489 (1971). 1975See a discussion of this principle in the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Neill in Chrobuck v. Snohomish County, 78 Wn.2d 858 , 480 P.2d 489 (1971).	1	1
State v. Casegreen wash · 1956 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1965–1965 2 sentences 1965See State v. Case, 49 Wn.2d 66 , 298 P.2d 500 (1956) for a discussion of the exception to the general rule requiring preservation of objections. 1965See State v. Case, 49 Wn.2d 66 , 298 P.2d 500 (1956) for a discussion of the exception to the general rule requiring preservation of objections.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (29)

Case	Cited	Years
Kirk v. Mount Airy Insurance green wash · 1998 2 sentences 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wash.2d at 433 , 38 P.3d 322 ; Kirk, 134 Wash.2d at 560 , 951 P.2d 1124 ; Transcon. 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wn.2d at 433 ; Kirk, 134 Wn.2d at 560 ; Transcon.	2	2010–2010
Overton v. Consolidated Insurance green wash · 2002 2 sentences 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wash.2d at 433 , 38 P.3d 322 ; Kirk, 134 Wash.2d at 560 , 951 P.2d 1124 ; Transcon. 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wn.2d at 433 ; Kirk, 134 Wn.2d at 560 ; Transcon.	2	2010–2010
Holly Mountain Resources, Ltd. v. Westport Ins. Corp. green washctapp · 2005 2 sentences 2010At the cited page, the only discussion of the standard for the tort of bad faith, apart from setting forth the language also used by the majority, is the following: "The insured does not establish bad faith . . . when . . . the insurer denies 704 coverage or fails to provide a defense based upon a reasonable interpretation of the insurance policy." Id. 2010*At the cited page, 650, the only discussion of the standard for the tort of bad faith, apart from setting forth the language also used by the majority, is the following: “The insured does not establish bad faith . .. when ... the insurer denies coverage or fails to provide a defense based upon a reasonable interpretation of the insurance policy.” Id.	2	2010–2010
Pybas v. Paolino green washctapp · 1994 2 sentences 2004Pybas v. Paolino, 73 Wash.App. 393, 399 , 869 P.2d 427 (1994). 2004Pybas v. Paolino, 73 Wn.	2	2004–2004
State v. Ellis green wash · 1998 1 sentence 2024A trial court abuses its discretion if “‘no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’” State v. Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d 904, 914 , 16 P.3d 626 (2001) (quoting State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 504 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998)). 2 Apart from a discussion of the standard of review, this sentence is the full extent of Mr. Hough’s analysis of this issue.	1	2024–2024
State v. Ellis green wash · 1998 1 sentence 2024A trial court abuses its discretion if “‘no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’” State v. Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d 904, 914 , 16 P.3d 626 (2001) (quoting State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 504 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998)). 2 Apart from a discussion of the standard of review, this sentence is the full extent of Mr. Hough’s analysis of this issue.	1	2024–2024
State v. Atsbeha green wash · 2001 1 sentence 2024A trial court abuses its discretion if “‘no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’” State v. Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d 904, 914 , 16 P.3d 626 (2001) (quoting State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 504 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998)). 2 Apart from a discussion of the standard of review, this sentence is the full extent of Mr. Hough’s analysis of this issue.	1	2024–2024
State v. Atsbeha green wash · 2001 1 sentence 2024A trial court abuses its discretion if “‘no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’” State v. Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d 904, 914 , 16 P.3d 626 (2001) (quoting State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 504 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998)). 2 Apart from a discussion of the standard of review, this sentence is the full extent of Mr. Hough’s analysis of this issue.	1	2024–2024
Weaver v. Massachusetts green scotus · 2017 2 sentences 2018Restraint ofSalinas, No. 91905-4 (Johnson, J., dissenting) facts of this case did not rise to the level of invited error, the Court of Appeals correctly held Hector Salinas is entitled to relief and should be affirmed.^ V ^ Curiously, the majority includes a discussion and analysis of Weaver v. Massachusetts, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 1899 , 198 L. 2018Restraint ofSalinas, No. 91905-4 (Johnson, J., dissenting) facts of this case did not rise to the level of invited error, the Court of Appeals correctly held Hector Salinas is entitled to relief and should be affirmed.^ V ^ Curiously, the majority includes a discussion and analysis of Weaver v. Massachusetts, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 1899 , 198 L.	1	2018–2018
State v. Jackman green wash · 2006 1 sentence 2017State v. Jackman, 156 Wn.2d 736, 746 , 132 P.3d 136 (2006).	1	2017–2017
State v. Jackman green wash · 2006 1 sentence 2017State v. Jackman, 156 Wn.2d 736, 746 , 132 P.3d 136 (2006).	1	2017–2017
State v. Robinson green wash · 2011 1 sentence 2012We need not, in this case, revisit the discussion of the standard in Robinson and A.N.J. — a postjudgment motion to withdraw a guilty plea must either meet the requirements of both CrR 4.2(f) and CrR 7.8, compare Robinson, 172 Wn.2d at 791 n.4, or only CrR 7.8, see CrR 4.2(f).	1	2012–2012
Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co. green wash · 2002 1 sentence 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wash.2d at 433 , 38 P.3d 322 ; Kirk, 134 Wash.2d at 560 , 951 P.2d 1124 ; Transcon.	1	2010–2010
Kirk v. Mt. Airy Ins. Co. green wash · 1998 1 sentence 2010Multiple precedents of this court include nearly identical language, see Overton, 145 Wash.2d at 433 , 38 P.3d 322 ; Kirk, 134 Wash.2d at 560 , 951 P.2d 1124 ; Transcon.	1	2010–2010
Davis v. Bendix Corp. green washctapp · 1996 1 sentence 1998This issue was recently decided by Division One in favor of L & I in Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996).	1	1998–1998
Davis v. Bendix Corp. green washctapp · 1996 2 sentences 1998This issue was recently decided by Division One in favor of L&I in Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wn. 1998This issue was recently decided by Division One in favor of L & I in Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996).	1	1998–1998
Grimsrud v. State green washctapp · 1991 1 sentence 1995Grimsrud v. State, 63 Wn.	1	1995–1995
Shotwell v. Transamerica Title Insurance green wash · 1978 1 sentence 1994Shotwell directs us to the policy as a whole and instructs the court not to place undue emphasis upon isolated segments of the policy, Shotwell, 91 Wn.2d at 166 ; see the discussion of standard exception B below.	1	1994–1994
City of Mountlake Terrace v. Stone green washctapp · 1971 1 sentence 1982Rev. 131 (1980). 3 For a more detailed and comprehensive discussion of the constitutional deficiencies and problems faced by criminal defendants under stop-and-identify statutes like the one before us, see Judge Horowitz' opinion in Mountlake Terrace *100 v. Stone, 6 Wn.	1	1982–1982
Blaak v. Davidson green wash · 1975 2 sentences 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel. 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel.	1	1976–1976
Godfrey v. Washington green wash · 1975 2 sentences 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel. 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel.	1	1976–1976
Freehe v. Freehe green wash · 1972 2 sentences 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel. 1976See Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 , 93 S.Ct. 1463 (1973). [2] Memel v. Reimer, 85 Wn.2d 685 , 538 P.2d 517 (1975); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Blaak v. Davidson, 84 Wn.2d 882 , 529 P.2d 1048 (1975); Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975). [3] For a discussion of the doctrine of prospective overruling, see State ex rel.	1	1976–1976
Ranta v. Rake green idaho · 1966 2 sentences 1973In Ranta v. Rake, 91 Idaho 376 , 421 P.2d 747 (1967), the court held the majority and more modern view recognizes out-of-court settlements of personal injury claims, but permits a releasor to avoid a release where unknown injuries existed at the time the release was executed. 1973In Ranta v. Rake, 91 Idaho 376 , 421 P.2d 747 (1967), the court held the majority and more modern view recognizes out-of-court settlements of personal injury claims, but permits a releasor to avoid a release where unknown injuries existed at the time the release was executed.	1	1973–1973
Rumford v. Snider green wash · 1948 1 sentence 1953Also, see Rumford v. Snider, 31 Wn. (2d) 431, 457, 197 P. (2d) 446 (1948).	1	1953–1953
State ex rel. Younger v. Clausen neutral wash · 1920 2 sentences 1945Younger v. Clausen, 111 Wash. 241 , 190 Pac. 324 , and in State ex rel. 1945Younger v. Clausen, 111 Wash. 241 , 190 Pac. 324 , and in State ex rel.	1	1945–1945
Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co. green wash · 1936	1	1942–1942
Fish v. United States green ca1 · 1914	1	1936–1936
Purington v. Hinchliff neutral ill · 1905	1	1910–1910
Sweeney v. Frank Waterhouse & Co. green wash · 1906	1	1910–1910

Where else courts name it

CA 226 (1907–2026) LA 168 (1941–2025) TX 156 (1905–2021) PA 112 (1911–2026) NY 81 (1891–2026) TN 77 (1904–2026) IL 59 (1872–2024) CT 55 (1857–2021) MA 55 (1874–2024) MO 47 (1905–2020) FL 43 (1914–2019) AL 40 (1894–2024) MD 38 (1939–2025) WV 36 (1935–2020) IN 36 (1867–2019) WI 32 (1891–2025) KS 28 (1904–2024) GA 27 (1895–2018) MI 26 (1889–2022) WA 23 (1910–2024) OK 21 (1908–2009) NC 21 (1895–2022) OH 21 (1906–2026) MT 21 (1919–2022) KY 20 (1917–2022) DE 20 (1972–2025) RI 19 (1968–2022) ME 16 (1947–2024) SC 16 (1929–2022) AZ 16 (1916–2020) OR 15 (1922–2025) MS 15 (1956–2020) NE 15 (1884–2021) VA 14 (1927–2015) AR 14 (1941–2026) NJ 14 (1891–2019) WY 14 (1948–1999) NM 12 (1950–2025) AK 11 (1964–2001) UT 10 (1958–2021) IA 9 (1962–2025) DC 9 (1956–2016) MN 8 (1900–2006) CO 8 (1952–2008) NV 7 (1991–2009) VT 7 (1967–2026) NH 5 (1986–2021) ID 5 (1968–2012) HI 4 (1982–2017) ND 4 (1950–1991) SD 3 (1979–2010) VI 2 (1988–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check