Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
110 Pennsylvania opinions name it 25 courts 1911–2026 15 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
F & M Schaeffer Brewing Co. v. Lehigh County Board of Appealsgreen2 sentences2011Actual or market value is defined as “the price which a purchaser, willing but not obligated to buy, would pay an owner, willing but not obligated to sell, taking into consideration all issues to which the property is adapted and might in reason be applied.” F & M Schaeffer Brewing Company v. Lehigh County Board of Appeals, 610 A.2d 1, 3 , 530 Pa. 451, 457 (1992) (citation omitted). 2011Actual or market value is defined as “the price which a purchaser, willing but not obligated to buy, would pay an owner, willing but not obligated to sell, taking into consideration all issues to which the property is adapted and might in reason be applied.” F & M Schaeffer Brewing Company v. Lehigh County Board of Appeals, 610 A.2d 1, 3 , 530 Pa. 451, 457 (1992) (citation omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Hayward v. Haywardgreen2 sentences2019See Pa.R.A.P. 2119 (describing briefing requirements); Hayward , 868 A.2d at 558 (finding that husband waived issue when he failed to cite pertinent authority and engage in a specific discussion of error with citation to record). 2019See Pa.R.A.P. 2119 (describing briefing requirements); Hayward, 868 A.2d at 558 (finding that husband waived issue when he failed to cite pertinent authority and engage in a specific discussion of error). | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Hartgreen2 sentences2021These exceptions are 'Com. v. Had, 911 A2 939, 941 (Pa. Super, 2006). 2Com. v. Hawkins, 894 A,2d 716, 722 (Pa, 2006). aCom. v. Had, 911 A.2d 939, 941 (Pa. Super. 2006). interference by government officials', facts unknown and not discoverable by due diligence 5.and newly recognized constitutional rights that apply retroactivelys.A petition claiming one of these exceptions must be filed within sixty (60) days of the time the claim could have been presented.r Further, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set forth in Commonwealth v. Fahy8 that "a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not sav 2016He received no further penalty on the Terroristic Threats (M1), Simple Assault (M1) and Harassment (S) charges. 2 Com. v. I-fart, 911 A.2d 939, 941 (Pa. Super. 2006). but its legal determinations are subject to plenary review.3 The PCRA court's findings will not be disturbed unless there is no support for the findings in the certified record." Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. 9545(b), a PCRA petition, including second and subsequent petitions, must be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final, unless the petition alleges and the petitioner proves that his claim(s) fall under any of th | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Westgreen2 sentences2020See Commonwealth v. West, 937 A.2d 516,521 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007); Pa. R. 2018See Commonwealth v West, 937 A.2d 516, 521 (Pa. Super. | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Riosgreen2 sentences2010The Majority states that a claim of counsel ineffectiveness with respect to mitigation poses a mixed question of law and fact, citing Commonwealth v. Rios, 591 Pa. 583 , 920 A.2d 790, 810 (2007) and Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , which held that the ineffectiveness inquiry is generally comprised of mixed questions of fact and law. 2010The Majority states that a claim of counsel ineffectiveness with respect to mitigation poses a mixed question of law and fact, citing Commonwealth v. Rios, 591 Pa. 583 , 920 A.2d 790, 810 (2007) and Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , which held that the ineffectiveness inquiry is generally comprised of mixed questions of fact and law. | 2 | 2 |
Kennedy, J. v. Crothall Healthcaregreen1 sentence2026See Appellant’s Reply Brief, at 6-11; see also Kennedy v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc., 321 A.3d 1065, 1072 (Pa. Super. 2026) (waiving argument raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a). | 1 | 1 |
Dorsey v. Redmangreen1 sentence2025Dorsey v. Redman, 96 A.3d 332, 340 (Pa. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
In the Int. of: H.H.N., Appeal of: D.B.green1 sentence2025Int. of H.H.N., 296 A.3d 1258, 1263 (Pa. Super. 2023). | 1 | 1 |
In Re: M.Z.T.M.W., a minor, Appeal of: M.W.green1 sentence2024See In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa. Super. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Rice v. Compro Distributing, Inc.green1 sentence2023Rice v. Compro Distrib., Inc., 901 A.2d 570, 574 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Maranc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2022Appeal Bd. (Bienenfeld), 751 A.2d 1196, 1199 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hardygreen1 sentence2022See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a); Commonwealth v. Hardy, 918 A.2d 766, 771 (Pa.Super. 2007) (“[I]t is an appellant's duty to present arguments that are sufficiently developed for our review. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Glassgreen1 sentence2021While we acknowledge the differing results this Court has reached with respect to the waiver of Alexander challenges, we do not find the discussion or analysis in these unpublished decisions particularly instructive on the facts of this case. readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.” Commonwealth v. Glass, 754 A.2d 655, 663 (Pa. 2000) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 (1983)). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Gatesgreen1 sentence2021While we acknowledge the differing results this Court has reached with respect to the waiver of Alexander challenges, we do not find the discussion or analysis in these unpublished decisions particularly instructive on the facts of this case. readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.” Commonwealth v. Glass, 754 A.2d 655, 663 (Pa. 2000) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 (1983)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hawkinsgreen1 sentence2021These exceptions are 'Com. v. Had, 911 A2 939, 941 (Pa. Super, 2006). 2Com. v. Hawkins, 894 A,2d 716, 722 (Pa, 2006). aCom. v. Had, 911 A.2d 939, 941 (Pa. Super. 2006). interference by government officials', facts unknown and not discoverable by due diligence 5.and newly recognized constitutional rights that apply retroactivelys.A petition claiming one of these exceptions must be filed within sixty (60) days of the time the claim could have been presented.r Further, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set forth in Commonwealth v. Fahy8 that "a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not sav | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Chambersgreen1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Hargrave, 145 A.3d 20 , 22 (Pa.Super. 2000), appeal denied, 160 A.2d 85 l (Pa. 2000)(internal citations omitted); Commonwealth. v. Brunson, 938 A.2d 1057, 1058 (Pa.Super. 2007); Commonwealth v. Chambers, 599 A.2d 630, 633 (Pa. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Brunsongreen1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Hargrave, 145 A.3d 20 , 22 (Pa.Super. 2000), appeal denied, 160 A.2d 85 l (Pa. 2000)(internal citations omitted); Commonwealth. v. Brunson, 938 A.2d 1057, 1058 (Pa.Super. 2007); Commonwealth v. Chambers, 599 A.2d 630, 633 (Pa. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOTgreen1 sentence2020In re Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, 137 A.3d 666, 670 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016) (State Route 1032). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Boyergreen1 sentence2019Commonwealth v. Boyer, 962 A.2d 1213, 1214 (Pa. Super. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Goodman v. Goodmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Stevensongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Powell v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.green | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Esteppgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Vaughn v. Didiziangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Levanduskigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Zortmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Dalbertogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Archergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Graham v. Campogreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re Appeal of deBottongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Powellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Poust v. Hyltongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Carrgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Gwynngreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Murraygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v. Giulianagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Bomargreen | 1 | 1 |
| Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Maritime Management, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Flowers
green
2 sentences2021For a discussion of the requirement of probable cause for the issuance of an arrest warrant, see Commonwealth v. Flowers, 369 A.2d 362 (Pa. Super. 1976). 2018For a discussion of the requirement of probable cause for the issuance of an arrest warrant, see Commonwealth v. Flowers, 369 A.2d 362 (Pa. Super. 1976). | 4 | 2017–2021 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2010The Majority states that a claim of counsel ineffectiveness with respect to mitigation poses a mixed question of law and fact, citing Commonwealth v. Rios, 591 Pa. 583 , 920 A.2d 790, 810 (2007) and Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , which held that the ineffectiveness inquiry is generally comprised of mixed questions of fact and law. 2010The Majority states that a claim of counsel ineffectiveness with respect to mitigation poses a mixed question of law and fact, citing Commonwealth v. Rios, 591 Pa. 583 , 920 A.2d 790, 810 (2007) and Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , which held that the ineffectiveness inquiry is generally comprised of mixed questions of fact and law. | 3 | 2001–2010 |
Allen v. Willard
green
2 sentences1925The discussion of this principle by Judge Agnew, in Allen v. Willard, 57 Pa. 374 , is instructive. 1916The discussion of this principle by Judge Ag-NEW, in Allen v. Willard, 57 Pa. 374 , is instructive. | 3 | 1911–1925 |
Commonwealth v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2022I incorporate the Majority’s discussion of the factors set forth in Commonwealth v. Bennett, 282 A. 2d 276 (Pa. 1971), for evaluating whether repeated Miranda warnings are necessary. 2022I incorporate the Majority’s discussion of the factors set forth in Commonwealth v. Bennett, 282 A. 2d 276 (Pa. 1971), for evaluating whether repeated Miranda warnings are necessary. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Warren's Estate
green
2 sentences1956For a discussion of the doctrine of remoteness see Warren’s Estate, 320 Pa. 112 , 182 A. 396 ; Harrah Estate, 364 Pa. 451 , 72 A. 2d 587 .” Testator died June 23, 1943, prior to the Estates Act of 1947, supra. We are, therefore, required to apply the common law rule. 1956For a discussion of the doctrine of remoteness see Warren’s Estate, 320 Pa. 112 , 182 A. 396 ; Harrah Estate, 364 Pa. 451 , 72 A. 2d 587 .” Testator died June 23, 1943, prior to the Estates Act of 1947, supra. We are, therefore, required to apply the common law rule. | 2 | 1954–1956 |
Harrah Estate
green
2 sentences1956For a discussion of the doctrine of remoteness see Warren’s Estate, 320 Pa. 112 , 182 A. 396 ; Harrah Estate, 364 Pa. 451 , 72 A. 2d 587 .” Testator died June 23, 1943, prior to the Estates Act of 1947, supra. We are, therefore, required to apply the common law rule. 1956For a discussion of the doctrine of remoteness see Warren’s Estate, 320 Pa. 112 , 182 A. 396 ; Harrah Estate, 364 Pa. 451 , 72 A. 2d 587 .” Testator died June 23, 1943, prior to the Estates Act of 1947, supra. We are, therefore, required to apply the common law rule. | 2 | 1954–1956 |
Garlick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
green
1 sentence2024Discussion Our standard of review is to determine “whether common pleas committed an error of law, whether common pleas abused its discretion, or whether the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.” Garlick v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 176 A.3d 1030 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re Estate of LeVin
green
1 sentence2023Following a discussion of the doctrine and review of several decisions from our sister jurisdictions, we stated that “the will . . . vests Meridian with extensive powers over the distribution and continuation of the trust in perpetuity which smacks of undue influence.” Id. at 43 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Bologna v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry
neutral
1 sentence2023DISCUSSION The standard for reviewing regulations promulgated to implement a statutory scheme where, as here, the empowering provision of the statute gives the 4 This Court’s scope of review of an administrative agency’s order is limited to a determination of whether constitutional rights were violated, whether the decision was rendered in accordance with the law, and whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. 2 Pa. C.S. § 704; Bologna v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, 816 A.2d 407 , 410 n.3 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Drouin v. State
green
1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Hargrave, 145 A.3d 20 , 22 (Pa.Super. 2000), appeal denied, 160 A.2d 85 l (Pa. 2000)(internal citations omitted); Commonwealth. v. Brunson, 938 A.2d 1057, 1058 (Pa.Super. 2007); Commonwealth v. Chambers, 599 A.2d 630, 633 (Pa. 1991). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Commonwealth v. Ratsamy
green
1 sentence2019Commonwealth v. Ratsamy, 885 A.2d 1005 , I 007 (Pa.Super. 2005). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Wheatley v. Niedich neutral | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Weaver v. Franklin County green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Hall v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Zortman v. Pennsylvania neutral | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Commonwealth v. Marts green | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Duquesne Light Co. v. Woodland Hills School District green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Altoona Area School District v. Campbell green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance Company green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp. green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Twin City Fire Insurance v. Fortunato neutral | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Republic Insurance Group v. Maleski green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Harman v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Mackay v. Sauerland neutral | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.