27 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hayes v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Hayes v. State, 298 Ga. 98, 104 (2) (b) ( 779 SE2d 609 ) (2015); Fair v. State, 284 Ga. 165, 168 (2) (b) ( 664 SE2d 227 ) (2008). 2016Hayes v. State, 298 Ga. 98, 104 (2) (b) ( 779 SE2d 609 ) (2015); Fair v. State, 284 Ga. 165, 168 (2) (b) ( 664 SE2d 227 ) (2008). | 2 | 2 |
Fair v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Hayes v. State, 298 Ga. 98, 104 (2) (b) ( 779 SE2d 609 ) (2015); Fair v. State, 284 Ga. 165, 168 (2) (b) ( 664 SE2d 227 ) (2008). 2016Hayes v. State, 298 Ga. 98, 104 (2) (b) ( 779 SE2d 609 ) (2015); Fair v. State, 284 Ga. 165, 168 (2) (b) ( 664 SE2d 227 ) (2008). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Roccogreen2 sentences2007Murray v. United States, supra, 487 U. S. at 542 . 4 Appellant’s reliance on the discussion of the doctrine of inevitable discovery in State v. Rocco, 255 Ga. App. 565, 566 ( 566 SE2d 365 ) (2002), is misplaced since that discussion is dicta, the appellate court having determined that the search of a home after a warrant had issued hut prior to it being in the physical possession of the searching officers was not an illegal search. 2007Murray v. United States, supra, 487 U. S. at 542 . 4 Appellant’s reliance on the discussion of the doctrine of inevitable discovery in State v. Rocco, 255 Ga. App. 565, 566 ( 566 SE2d 365 ) (2002), is misplaced since that discussion is dicta, the appellate court having determined that the search of a home after a warrant had issued hut prior to it being in the physical possession of the searching officers was not an illegal search. | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Wadley Lumber Co. v. Lottgreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Hancock v. Hancockgreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Surman v. Blansettgreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosaigreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.green2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Floyd v. Hoovergreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Cowangreen2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Wiley v. Tom Howell & Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T 2002Rev. 1 , 10-14 (2000). 3 (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Floyd v. Hoover, 141 Ga. App. 588, 592 (2) ( 234 SE2d 89 ) (1977). 4 Williams v. Cowan, 226 Ga. 319, 320 ( 174 SE2d 789 ) (1970). 5 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. Tom Howell & Assoc., 154 Ga. App. 235, 236 ( 267 SE2d 816 ) (1980). 6 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Bulloch South, Inc. v. Gosai, 250 Ga. App. 170, 172 (1) ( 550 SE2d 750 ) (2001); see also OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). 7 See, e.g., Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc., 252 Ga. 458, 459 (1) ( 314 SE2d 874 ) (1984). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wiley v. T | 1 | 1 |
Humphrey v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Humphrey v. State, 252 Ga. 525, 527 (1) ( 314 SE2d 436 ). 1998Humphrey v. State, 252 Ga. 525, 527 (1) ( 314 SE2d 436 ). | 1 | 1 |
Ponder v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authoritygreen2 sentences1993Auth., 256 Ga. 833, 835 ( 353 SE2d 515 ) (1987), this court included the intermediate standard in a discussion of which standard to apply in a consideration of an equal protection challenge to the charitable immunity doctrine. 1993Auth., 256 Ga. 833, 835 ( 353 SE2d 515 ) (1987), this court included the intermediate standard in a discussion of which standard to apply in a consideration of an equal protection challenge to the charitable immunity doctrine. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Austingreen2 sentences1982Such medical testimony was presented in Zipkin v. Freeman, and in Anclote Manor Foundation, supra. See Seymour v. Lofgreen, Kan., 495 P2d 969, 972 (1972) for a full discussion of the doctrine of transference in psychiatry where the court, quoting from Zipkin, supra, stated: "`"What is perhaps regarded as the most significant concept in psychoanalytical therapy, and one of the most important discoveries of Freud, is the emotional reaction of the patient toward the analyst known as the transference . . .", [Cit.]'" Based on the above, it is clear at this stage of the proceeding that neither the 1982Such medical testimony was presented in Zipkin v. Freeman, and in Anclote Manor Foundation, supra. See Seymour v. Lofgreen, Kan., 495 P2d 969, 972 (1972) for a full discussion of the doctrine of transference in psychiatry where the court, quoting from Zipkin, supra, stated: “ ‘ “What is perhaps regarded as the most significant concept in psychoanalytical therapy, and one of the most important discoveries of Freud, is the emotional reaction of the patient toward the analyst known as the transference . . ”, [Cit¡]’ ” Based on the above, it is clear at this stage of the proceeding that neither th | 1 | 1 |
Rhyne v. Garfieldgreen2 sentences1980For a discussion as to the standard to be applied to a motion to strike, see Rhyne v. Garfield, 236 Ga. 694, 695 ( 225 SE2d 43 ). 1980For a discussion as to the standard to be applied to a motion to strike, see Rhyne v. Garfield, 236 Ga. 694, 695 ( 225 SE2d 43 ). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Younggreen2 sentences1955See, in this connection, Johnson v. Young, 79 Ga. App. 276 ( 53 S. E. 2d 559 ), for a discussion of the rule on adding no new cause of action by amendment. 2. 1955See, in this connection, Johnson v. Young, 79 Ga. App. 276 ( 53 S. E. 2d 559 ), for a discussion of the rule on adding no new cause of action by amendment. 2. | 1 | 1 |
City of Dalton v. Andersongreen1 sentence1954City of Dalton v. Anderson, 72 Ga. App. 109, 112 ( 33 S. E. 2d 115 ). *125 A portion of the evidence in the case is as follows: Mr. R. | 1 | 1 |
Hood v. Durengreen2 sentences1949See the discussion of this doctrine in Hood v. Duren, 33 Ga. App. 203 ( 125 S. E. 787 ). 1949See the discussion of this doctrine in Hood v. Duren, 33 Ga. App. 203 ( 125 S. E. 787 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Lomax v. Lomaxgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Lindseygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
green
2 sentences2018WXIA-TV and 13 WMAZ-TV urge that we review the modified gag order as a prior restraint, using the standard of review for prior restraints described in Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart , 427 U.S. 539 , 96 S.Ct. 2791 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683 (1976). 2018WXIA-TV and 13 WMAZ-TV urge that we review the modified gag order as a prior restraint, using the standard of review for prior restraints described in Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart , 427 U.S. 539 , 96 S.Ct. 2791 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683 (1976). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Mathis v. Jones
green
2 sentences1942J., in Mathis v. Jones, 84 Ga. 804 .” There can be no doubt that the interpretation of this clause of the constitution announced in Mathis v. Jones has been the law since that opinion was rendered. 1895J., in Mathis v. Jones, 84 Ga. 804 . | 2 | 1895–1942 |
Boyd v. United States
red
2 sentences1916The analysis of the case of Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 616 (6 Sup. Ct. 524, 29 L. ed. 746), by the Justice who wrote the opinion is clear, and finds approval in the recent cases of Interstate Com. 1916The analysis of the ease of Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 616 (6 Sup. Ct. 524, 29 L. ed. 746), by the Justice who wrote the opinion is clear, and finds approval in the recent cases of Interstate Com. | 2 | 1916–1916 |
Murray v. United States
green
1 sentence2007Murray v. United States, supra, 487 U. S. at 542 . 4 Appellant’s reliance on the discussion of the doctrine of inevitable discovery in State v. Rocco, 255 Ga. App. 565, 566 ( 566 SE2d 365 ) (2002), is misplaced since that discussion is dicta, the appellate court having determined that the search of a home after a warrant had issued hut prior to it being in the physical possession of the searching officers was not an illegal search. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
1 sentence1998Therefore, we shall consider the two enumerations in the same discussion because the test established in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560), is the appropriate one to use when the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, whether the challenge is from the denial of a directed verdict or the denial of a motion for new trial based upon alleged insufficiency of the evidence. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Brewer v. Williams
green
1 sentence1987The case was docketed in this court on November 25, 1986, and was orally argued February 9, 1987. 2 And it has been pointed out that Brewer v. Williams, 430 U. S. 387 (97 SC 1232, 51 LE2d 424) (1977), which the U. S. Supreme Court chose to treat as a Sixth Amendment case, quotes extensively and approvingly the discussion of waiver by the lower federal courts, without, however, pointing out that the lower courts had discussed waiver in a Fifth Amendment context. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Lee v. State
green
2 sentences1985In this connection, however, I believe that the evidence in this case clearly authorized the denial of the motion for directed verdict as adjudged by the standard enunciated by our Supreme Court in Lee v. State, 247 Ga. 411 ( 276 SE2d 590 ) (1981). 1985In this connection, however, I believe that the evidence in this case clearly authorized the denial of the motion for directed verdict as adjudged by the standard enunciated by our Supreme Court in Lee v. State, 247 Ga. 411 ( 276 SE2d 590 ) (1981). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1984Citing Clarke v. Zant, supra, which held that in future cases the record should reflect the discussion of the waiver of counsel, we found “the same advice and warning necessary when a defendant, for whatever reason, appears for trial without counsel.” 161 Ga. App. at 664 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Garbutt Lumber Co. v. Walker
neutral
2 sentences1955Where, in such a case as indicated in division 1, it appears from the allegations of the petition that, contemporaneously with the signing of the notes, the maker of the notes executed and delivered a deed to certain realty and personal property to secure the payment of the notes, and such deed provided that the power of sale contained therein was to be exercised by the grantee (the payee in the notes) at the option of the grantee upon default in payment of the notes; and it also appears that the deed to secure the debt recites that the grantor and grantee (the maker and payee of the notes) ha 1955Where, in such a case as indicated in division 1, it appears from the allegations of the petition that, contemporaneously with the signing of the notes, the maker of the notes executed and delivered a deed to certain realty and personal property to secure the payment of the notes, and such deed provided that the power of sale contained therein was to be exercised by the grantee (the payee in the notes) at the option of the grantee upon default in payment of the notes; and it also appears that the deed to secure the debt recites that the grantor and grantee (the maker and payee of the notes) ha | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Ellis v. State
green
1 sentence1954City of Dalton v. Anderson, 72 Ga. App. 109, 112 ( 33 S. E. 2d 115 ). *125 A portion of the evidence in the case is as follows: Mr. R. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. Nisbet
green
1 sentence1944For a full discussion of this rule, see Trustees of Jesse Williams Hospital v. Nisbet, supra. The plaintiff in this case simply showed the confidential relationship without additional necessary facts. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
| Shaver v. Martin green | 1 | 1937–1937 |
| Brannan v. City of Brunswick green | 1 | 1936–1936 |
| General Oil Co. v. Crain green | 1 | 1936–1936 |
| Lampton & Burks v. Wood green | 1 | 1936–1936 |
| Vaughn v. Boyd green | 1 | 1935–1935 |
| Watson v. Kvaternik neutral | 1 | 1935–1935 |
| Cribb & Co. v. Bagley & Rivers neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| McKenzie v. Thomas neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.