Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dorsey v. Stategreen2 sentences2022We decline to make Maryland an outlier by adopting an even more rigorous standard for harmless error review. 27 Dorsey, 276 Md. at 649 (emphasis added). 2022We decline to make Maryland an outlier by adopting an even more rigorous standard for harmless error review. 27 Dorsey, 276 Md. at 649 (emphasis added). | 3 | 3 |
McDonald v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See also McDonald v. State, 347 Md. 452, 467 , 701 A.2d 675 (1997); State v. Coley, 145 Md.App. at 521 , 805 A.2d 1186 . 2012See also McDonald v. State, 347 Md. 452, 467 , 701 A.2d 675 (1997); State v. Coley, 145 Md.App. at 521 , 805 A.2d 1186 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Ducagreen2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
Philpot v. Stategreen2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Michael Warren Coletta, John A. Wilms, Herve Bitton, Hernan Castrogreen1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Donald Lorrin Cronngreen1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coegreen1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Holmangreen1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
Hollis v. Ellisgreen1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
State v. Christensengreen2 sentences1989Cf. State v. Christensen, 720 S.W.2d 738, 739 (Mo.App.1986) (holding Batson inapplicable when white defendant objects to use of peremptory strikes against blacks, but suggesting that white defendant could have prevailed had he met the more rigorous standard of Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)). 1989Cf. State v. Christensen, 720 S.W.2d 738, 739 (Mo. App. 1986) (holding Batson inapplicable when white defendant objects to use of peremptory strikes against blacks, but suggesting that white defendant could have prevailed had he met the more rigorous standard of Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)). | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Stategreen2 sentences1987If warrant-issuing judges are permitted “a standard less demanding than those used in more formal legal proceedings,” a fortiori, officers on the street will be allowed the less demanding standard: “[G]iven the informal, often hurried context in which it must be applied, the ‘built-in subtleties,’ Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 528 , 313 A.2d 847, 860 (1974), of the ‘two-pronged test’ are particularly unlikely to assist magistrates in determining probable cause.” 462 U.S. at 236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2331 . 1987If warrant-issuing judges are permitted “a standard less demanding than those used in more formal legal proceedings,” a fortiori, officers on the street will be allowed the less demanding standard: “[G]iven the informal, often hurried context in which it must be applied, the ‘built-in subtleties,’ Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 528 , 313 A.2d 847, 860 (1974), of the ‘two-pronged test’ are particularly unlikely to assist magistrates in determining probable cause.” 462 U.S. at 236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2331 . | 1 | 1 |
| Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., Iowagreen | 1 | 1 |
| City of Lakewood v. Pillowgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Barksdalegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. S.R.yellow2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences1990Illinois v. Gates reminded us, 462 U.S. at 235-236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2330 , that the warrant-issuing magistrates themselves need not be legally trained, that search warrants “long have been issued by persons who are neither lawyers nor judges” and that “warrants are — quite properly ... — issued on the basis of nontechnical, commonsense judgments of laymen applying a standard less demanding than those used in more formal legal proceedings.” Thus, while the “clearly erroneous” test demands some legally sufficient evidence for each and every element to be proved — to wit, that a prima facie case be 1990Illinois v. Gates reminded us, 462 U.S. at 235-236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2330 , that the warrant-issuing magistrates themselves need not be legally trained, that search warrants “long have been issued by persons who are neither lawyers nor judges” and that “warrants are — quite properly ... — issued on the basis of nontechnical, commonsense judgments of laymen applying a standard less demanding than those used in more formal legal proceedings.” Thus, while the “clearly erroneous” test demands some legally sufficient evidence for each and every element to be proved — to wit, that a prima facie case be | 5 | 1983–2008 |
State v. Amerman
green
2 sentences2012In line with that clear directive, this Court held in State v. Amerman, 84 Md.App. at 473 , 581 A.2d 19 : Thus, while the “clearly erroneous” test demands some legally sufficient evidence for each and every element to be proved—to wit, that a prima facie case be established— Illinois v. Gates rejected such a rigorous standard for. establishing probable cause and opted instead for a “totality of circumstances” approach wherein an excess of evidence as to one aspect of proof may make up for a deficit as to another. 2012In line with that clear directive, this Court held in State v. Amerman, 84 Md.App. at 473 , 581 A.2d 19 : Thus, while the “clearly erroneous” test demands some legally sufficient evidence for each and every element to be proved—to wit, that a prima facie case be established— Illinois v. Gates rejected such a rigorous standard for. establishing probable cause and opted instead for a “totality of circumstances” approach wherein an excess of evidence as to one aspect of proof may make up for a deficit as to another. | 3 | 2002–2017 |
Attorney General of Maryland v. Waldron
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 706 , 426 A.2d 929 ." And in O.C. 2003Id. at 706 , 426 A.2d 929 ." And in O.C. | 2 | 1983–2003 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2026Terry places at the center of that inquiry the State’s interest in “effective crime prevention and detection[.]” Id. 2026Terry contemplates a more rigorous analysis which, when performed here, decisively favors the constitutionality of the stop. 1 The starting point under Terry is “the nature and extent of the governmental interests involved.” 392 U.S. at 22 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Washington v. Harper
red
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
United States v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences2012The Supreme Court noted that, because such a request "will divert prosecutors' resources and may disclose the Government’s prosecutorial strategy,” the "justifications for a rigorous standard for the elements of a selective-prosecution claim thus require a correspondingly rigorous standard for discovery in aid of such a claim.” 517 U.S. at 468 , 116 S.Ct. 1480 . 2012The Supreme Court noted that, because such a request "will divert prosecutors' resources and may disclose the Government’s prosecutorial strategy,” the "justifications for a rigorous standard for the elements of a selective-prosecution claim thus require a correspondingly rigorous standard for discovery in aid of such a claim.” 517 U.S. at 468 , 116 S.Ct. 1480 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Coley
green
2 sentences2012See also McDonald v. State, 347 Md. 452, 467 , 701 A.2d 675 (1997); State v. Coley, 145 Md.App. at 521 , 805 A.2d 1186 . 2012See also McDonald v. State, 347 Md. 452, 467 , 701 A.2d 675 (1997); State v. Coley, 145 Md.App. at 521 , 805 A.2d 1186 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
McNeil v. State
green
2 sentences2012In McNeil, 112 Md.App. at 465 , 685 A.2d 839 , this Court noted that a similar standard should be used for evaluating a request for a hearing on a claim for prosecutorial misconduct. . 2012In McNeil, 112 Md.App. at 465 , 685 A.2d 839 , this Court noted that a similar standard should be used for evaluating a request for a hearing on a claim for prosecutorial misconduct. . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, 337 Md. 441, 453-55 , 654 A.2d 449 (1995). 2009Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, 337 Md. 441, 453-55 , 654 A.2d 449 (1995). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Koritz v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Haraway v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Alexander v. Texas
neutral
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. . Koritz
green
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Alexander v. State
green
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Haraway v. State
green
2 sentences1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex 1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Swain v. Alabama
red
2 sentences1989Cf. State v. Christensen, 720 S.W.2d 738, 739 (Mo. App. 1986) (holding Batson inapplicable when white defendant objects to use of peremptory strikes against blacks, but suggesting that white defendant could have prevailed had he met the more rigorous standard of Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)). 1989Cf. State v. Christensen, 720 S.W.2d 738, 739 (Mo. App. 1986) (holding Batson inapplicable when white defendant objects to use of peremptory strikes against blacks, but suggesting that white defendant could have prevailed had he met the more rigorous standard of Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Levasseur v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1989But see People v. S.R., 136 Misc.2d 54 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 864, 865-867 (1987). [4] See, e.g., Philpot v. State, 43 Ala.App. 326, 328 , 190 So.2d 293, 296 (1966); Haraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 914 , 159 S.W.2d 733, 734 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 648 , 63 S.Ct. 42 , 87 L.Ed. 521 (1942); State v. Koritz, 227 N.C. 552, 556 , 43 S.E.2d 77, 80 , cert. denied, 332 U.S. 768 , 68 S.Ct. 80 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947); Commonwealth v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 105-106 , 165 A. 825, 826-827 (1933); State v. Coe, 655 S.W.2d 903, 909-910 (Tenn. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1063 , 104 S.Ct. 745 , 79 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Alex | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Agurs
red
2 sentences1989The reason for holding the prosecution to a rigorous standard of performance in such a situation is clear: “In those cases the Court has applied a strict standard of materiality, not just because they involve prosecutorial misconduct, but more importantly because they involve a corruption of the truth-seeking function of the trial process.” 427 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 2398 . 1989The reason for holding the prosecution to a rigorous standard of performance in such a situation is clear: “In those cases the Court has applied a strict standard of materiality, not just because they involve prosecutorial misconduct, but more importantly because they involve a corruption of the truth-seeking function of the trial process.” 427 U.S. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 2398 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton neutral | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Clements v. Fashing green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Bullock v. Carter green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Johnson v. Johnson neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| Wehr v. German Evangelical Lutheran Saint Matthew's Congregation neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| Polley v. Polley green | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.