21 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Elstongreen2 sentences2024In the second part of the analysis, “[t]o prove the district court abused its discretion in refusing to sever charges, [the defendant] bears the burden of showing prejudice resulting from joinder outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” Elston, 735 N.W.2d at 199 (citation omitted). 2023Moving onto the second part of the analysis, to prove the court abused its discretion in refusing to sever the charges, Johnson “bears the burden of showing prejudice resulting from joinder outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” Elston, 735 N.W.2d at 199 . | 3 | 4 |
State v. Magheegreen2 sentences2020Thus, our review is for correction of errors at law for this part of the rule. 573 N.W.2d 1, 5 (Iowa 1997). 2018State v. Maghee, 573 N.W.2d 1, 5 (Iowa 1997). | 3 | 3 |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruengreen2 sentences2025To carry this burden, “the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest.” Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17. 2025To carry this burden, “the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest.” Bruen, 597 U.S. at 17 . | 1 | 1 |
Wende v. Orv Rocker Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.green2 sentences2025See id. (“On the other hand, if the material facts surrounding the settlement are disputed, the issue must be resolved by the finder of fact. 2025See id. (“On the other hand, if the material facts surrounding the settlement are disputed, the issue must be resolved by the finder of fact. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Rahimigreen2 sentences2025In the second part of the inquiry, courts ask: Can the government carry its burden of “justify[ing] its regulation?” Id.; see also Rahimi, 602 U.S. at 691. 2025In the second part of the inquiry, courts ask: Can the government carry its burden of “justify[ing] its regulation?” Id.; see also Rahimi, 602 U.S. at 691 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lamgreen1 sentence2023On that point, Johnson argues he was prejudiced because “the evidence related to offenses allegedly committed against K.H.M. would not be admissible for any of the purposes listed in [Iowa Rule of Evidence] 5.404(b) in a trial on the counts involving G.J., and vice versa.” But in Romer, the supreme court stated that “an attempt to equate our evidentiary rule’s principles with [joinder] principles is inapposite.” 832 N.W.2d at 183 ; accord Lam, 391 N.W.2d at 250 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re P.L.green1 sentence2018See id. at 40 . | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of K.J.K.green1 sentence1992The court in In re K.J.K., 396 N.W.2d 370, 371-72 (Iowa App.1986), reversed a termination order and found the child had a right to support from her father. | 1 | 1 |
Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San Franciscogreen2 sentences1990Paul only sought to revoke the listing agreement after the Jenkins, upon learning that they would in fact be moving to Cedar Falls, decided to go through with the purchase of the Pettits’ house. *205 The second part of our analysis requires a determination of whether this exercise of in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant satisfies the “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” See Kulko v. California Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84, 92 , 98 S.Ct. 1690, 1696-97 , 56 L.Ed.2d 132, 141 (1978). 1990Paul only sought to revoke the listing agreement after the Jenkins, upon learning that they would in fact be moving to Cedar Falls, decided to go through with the purchase of the Pettits’ house. *205 The second part of our analysis requires a determination of whether this exercise of in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant satisfies the “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” See Kulko v. California Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84, 92 , 98 S.Ct. 1690, 1696-97 , 56 L.Ed.2d 132, 141 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Brent Michael Romer
green
1 sentence2023On that point, Johnson argues he was prejudiced because “the evidence related to offenses allegedly committed against K.H.M. would not be admissible for any of the purposes listed in [Iowa Rule of Evidence] 5.404(b) in a trial on the counts involving G.J., and vice versa.” But in Romer, the supreme court stated that “an attempt to equate our evidentiary rule’s principles with [joinder] principles is inapposite.” 832 N.W.2d at 183 ; accord Lam, 391 N.W.2d at 250 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Schlup v. Delo
red
2 sentences2019This second part of the test requires consideration of “‘all the evidence,’ old and new, incriminating and exculpatory, without regard to whether it would necessarily be admitted under ‘rules of admissibility that would govern at trial.’” Id. (quoting Schlup, 513 U.S. at 327–28). 2019This second part of the test requires consideration of “‘all the evidence,’ old and new, incriminating and exculpatory, without regard to whether it would necessarily be admitted under ‘rules of admissibility that would govern at trial.’” Id. (quoting Schlup, 513 U.S. at 327–28). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Bearshield v. John Morrell & Co.
green
1 sentence2019Bearshield, 570 N.W.2d at 920-22 . 3 The court noted only one exception; the employee needed assistance in doing laundry because the laundry appliances were in the basement and, although she could go up and down stairs, doing so caused her pain. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Marriage of Fennelly & Breckenfelder
green
1 sentence2019Fennelly, 737 N.W.2d at 104 -05 (quoting Russ, Dissipation in Division, at 421). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Root
green
1 sentence2018In support of his argument that the record is inadequate to conduct appellate review, Barrett relies on State v. Root, 801 N.W.2d 29 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011), and State v. Scarlett, No. 14-1704, 2016 WL 1130039 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2016). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Herrera v. IBP, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015While the “preferred analysis is to first determine the date the injury is deemed to have occurred under the Tasler test,” see id., in this case, the deputy bypassed this step and went directly to the date Winn discovered her injury, the second part of the test. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Graber v. City of Ankeny
green
1 sentence2004In fact, the city produced no evidence that the choice it made with respect to whether the overlay should be done with or without grading of the accompanying shoulders was the sort of decision that the discretionary function immunity intends to protect, i.e., a decision weighing “social, economic, or political policies.” See Graber, 656 N.W.2d at 165 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Doe v. Cedar Rapids Community School District
green
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 , 113 S.Ct. at 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d at 481 . 1997Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 , 113 S.Ct. at 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d at 481 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Hecla Mining Company v. National Labor Relations Board
green
1 sentence1984In considering impact, “factors to be considered include the rank of the individual who engaged in the conduct, whether the employer or the employee initiated the communication, the total background of all pre-election conduct and of course any evidence directly suggesting that the conduct had either an isolated or pervasive impact.” Hecla, 564 F.2d at 314 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.