6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olson v. City of Garrisongreen2 sentences2009Olson v. City of Garrison, 539 N.W.2d 663, 666-67 (N.D.1995). [¶ 15] We further explained in Peterson v. Traill County, 1999 ND 197, ¶ 13 , 601 N.W.2d 268 : The primary focus of the second part of the test is on the nature of the actions taken and on whether they are susceptible to policy analysis. 2009Olson v. City of Garrison, 539 N.W.2d 663, 666-67 (N.D.1995). [¶ 15] We further explained in Peterson v. Traill County, 1999 ND 197, ¶ 13 , 601 N.W.2d 268 : The primary focus of the second part of the test is on the nature of the actions taken and on whether they are susceptible to policy analysis. | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Kirk C. Reivichgreen1 sentence2003See United States v. Reivich, 793 F.2d 957, 962 (8th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Jacobs, 986 F.2d 1231, 1235 (8th Cir.1993) (“[T]he defendant must show that the omitted material would be ‘clearly critical’ to the finding of probable cause.”). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ronald Foster Jacobsgreen1 sentence2003See United States v. Reivich, 793 F.2d 957, 962 (8th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Jacobs, 986 F.2d 1231, 1235 (8th Cir.1993) (“[T]he defendant must show that the omitted material would be ‘clearly critical’ to the finding of probable cause.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Phelps
green
1 sentence2015Olson, 1998 ND 41, ¶ 16 , 575 N.W.2d 649 ; Phelps, 297 N.W.2d at 775 . [¶ 19] Asbach told Bohn he could not consent to a vehicle search because Walker rented the vehicle. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Nix v. Williams
green
2 sentences2015State v. Olson, 1998 ND 41, ¶ 16 , 575 N.W.2d 649 ; Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984). [¶ 17] The district court found Walker’s consent to search the vehicle and trunk did not extend to Asbach’s suitcase, in which edible THC was found. 2015State v. Olson, 1998 ND 41, ¶ 16 , 575 N.W.2d 649 ; Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984). [¶ 17] The district court found Walker’s consent to search the vehicle and trunk did not extend to Asbach’s suitcase, in which edible THC was found. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Olson
green
2 sentences2015State v. Olson, 1998 ND 41, ¶ 16 , 575 N.W.2d 649 ; Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984). [¶ 17] The district court found Walker’s consent to search the vehicle and trunk did not extend to Asbach’s suitcase, in which edible THC was found. 2015State v. Olson, 1998 ND 41, ¶ 16 , 575 N.W.2d 649 ; Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984). [¶ 17] The district court found Walker’s consent to search the vehicle and trunk did not extend to Asbach’s suitcase, in which edible THC was found. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Peterson v. Traill County
green
2 sentences2009Olson v. City of Garrison, 539 N.W.2d 663, 666-67 (N.D.1995). [¶ 15] We further explained in Peterson v. Traill County, 1999 ND 197, ¶ 13 , 601 N.W.2d 268 : The primary focus of the second part of the test is on the nature of the actions taken and on whether they are susceptible to policy analysis. 2009Olson v. City of Garrison, 539 N.W.2d 663, 666-67 (N.D.1995). [¶ 15] We further explained in Peterson v. Traill County, 1999 ND 197, ¶ 13 , 601 N.W.2d 268 : The primary focus of the second part of the test is on the nature of the actions taken and on whether they are susceptible to policy analysis. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Dvorak
green
1 sentence2001State v. Dvorak, 2000 ND 6, ¶ 16 , 604 N.W.2d 445 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Dvorak
green
1 sentence2001State v. Dvorak, 2000 ND 6, ¶ 16 , 604 N.W.2d 445 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.