Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
85 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2026 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marks v. Vanderventergreen2 sentences2016See Marks, 2015 IL 116226, ¶ 19 . “[E]ven if the burden caused by imposition of the surcharge falls on a group who neither benefits from the surcharge nor caused the problems to be remedied by the surcharge, the surcharge may be constitutionally valid so long as there is a rational relationship between the object of the legislation and the classification at issue.” Id. ¶ 22. ¶ 18 Plaintiffs note that they attached to their motion for partial summary judgment a notice sent out by White along with renewal notices. 2015See Marks, 2015 IL 116226, ¶ 19 . “[E]ven if the burden caused by imposition of the surcharge falls on a group who neither benefits from the surcharge nor caused the problems to be remedied by the surcharge, the surcharge may be constitutionally valid so long as there is a rational relationship between the object of the legislation and the classification at issue.” Id. ¶ 22. ¶ 18 Plaintiffs note that they attached to their motion for partial summary judgment a notice sent out by White along with renewal notices. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2004See Martinez, 276 Kan. at 535 , 78 P.3d at 774 . 2004See Martinez, 276 Kan. at 535 , 78 P.3d at 774 . | 3 | 3 |
Estate of Price v. Universal Casualty Co.green2 sentences2002Price, 322 Ill.App.3d at 517 , 255 Ill.Dec. 822 , 750 N.E.2d 739 . 2002Estate of Price v. Universal Casualty Co., 322 Ill. | 2 | 4 |
People v. Manninggreen2 sentences2025Id. at 687 . ¶ 12 A. Counsel’s Performance Fell Below an Objective Standard of Reasonableness ¶ 13 To show counsel’s deficient performance, a defendant must overcome the “strong presumption” that counsel’s decisions were the product of “sound trial strategy.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) People v. Manning, 241 Ill. 2d 319, 327 (2011). 2025Id. at 687 . ¶ 12 A. Counsel’s Performance Fell Below an Objective Standard of Reasonableness ¶ 13 To show counsel’s deficient performance, a defendant must overcome the “strong presumption” that counsel’s decisions were the product of “sound trial strategy.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) People v. Manning, 241 Ill. 2d 319, 327 (2011). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Piatkowskigreen2 sentences2020People v. Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d 551, 565 (2007). 2020People v. Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d 551, 565 (2007). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collectorgreen2 sentences2017If “applying the statute would have a retroactive impact, then the court must presume that the legislature did not intend that it be so applied.” Id. (citing Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector, 196 Ill. 2d 27, 38 (2001)); see also J.T. 2017If “applying the statute would have a retroactive impact, then the court must presume that the legislature did not intend that it be so applied.” Id. (citing Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector, 196 Ill. 2d 27, 38 (2001)); see also J.T. | 2 | 2 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, Internationalgreen2 sentences2005It recognized that, under AFSCME and federal cases applying the public-policy doctrine, an arbitrator's reinstatement of an employee such as DuBose must be upheld "as long as the arbitrator makes a rational finding that the employee can be trusted to refrain from the offending conduct." DuBose , 173 Ill. 2d at 322 ; see also Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International , 808 F.2d 76 (D.C. 2005It recognized that, under AFSCME and federal cases applying the public-policy doctrine, an arbitrator’s reinstatement of an employee such as DuBose must be upheld “as long as the arbitrator makes a rational finding that the employee can be trusted to refrain from the offending conduct.” DuBose, 173 Ill. 2d at 322 ; see also Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, International, 808 F.2d 76 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
Evans v. Gurnee Inns, Inc.green2 sentences2001Evans v. Gurnee Inns, Inc., 268 Ill. 2001Evans v. Gurnee Inns , Inc. , 268 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
In Re JASgreen2 sentences1999“A medical prognosis need not be absolutely conclusive to satisfy the requirement of the statute.” J.A.S., 255 Ill. 1999"A medical prognosis need not be absolutely conclusive to satisfy the requirement of the statute." J.A.S., 255 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2020To satisfy the second part of the test, the defendant must demonstrate a reasonable probability of a more favorable outcome “but for counsel’s unprofessional errors.” Id. at 694 . 12 ¶ 43 A defendant asserting ineffective assistance of counsel must satisfy both parts of the Strickland test. 2020To satisfy the second part of the test, the defendant must show that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” 35 Id. at 694 . | 1 | 9 |
People v. Millergreen2 sentences2024Miller, 238 Ill. 2d at 166 . 2021Miller, 238 Ill. 2d at 163, 166 . | 1 | 2 |
Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois State Labor Relations Boardgreen2 sentences2019First, the Board adopted the ALJ’s recommendations and found that the senior procurement specialists were engaged predominantly in executive and management functions. “ ‘[E]xecutive and management functions specifically relate to the running of the agency or department, including the establishment of policies and procedures, preparation of the budget, and responsibility that the agency or department operates effectively and efficiently.’ ” County of Cook, 351 Ill. App. 3d at 386 (quoting Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 278 Ill. App. 3d 79, 87 2004The second part of the test is met “when an individual oversees or coordinates policy implementation through development of means and methods of achieving policy objectives, determines the extent to which the objectives will be achieved, and is empowered with a substantial amount of discretion to determine how policies will be effected.” Department of Central Management Services, 278 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
Graham v. Floridagreen2 sentences2011Roper, 543 U.S. at 564 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 ; Graham, 560 U.S. at ___ , 130 S.Ct. at 2026 . 2011Roper, 543 U.S. at 564 ; Graham, 560 U.S. at ___, 130 S. Ct. at 2026. | 1 | 2 |
| People v. Ammonsgreen | 1 | 1 |
People v. Jeffriesgreen1 sentence2026Id.; see Jeffries, 164 Ill. 2d at 127-28 (holding that, in order to instruct the jury on self-defense, a defendant must establish some evidence of each element). - 12 - ¶ 37 In Ammons, 2021 IL App (3d) 150743, ¶¶ 1, 5, 14 , the defendant was convicted of aggravated battery of a police officer for biting a police officer’s finger as several officers tried to place the defendant under arrest. | 1 | 1 |
| First Midwest Bank v. Rossigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.green | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Wardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Colemangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Elementary School District 159 v. Schillergreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re JBgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. D.D.green | 1 | 1 |
| Hill v. Lockhartgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Detention of Ehrlich
green
2 sentences2019As stated, the Act provides that “[i]f the court determines after hearing that any rule or condition of release has been violated, *** it may revoke the order for conditional release and order that the released person be placed in an appropriate institution until the person is discharged from the commitment under *** this Act or until again placed on conditional release under *** this Act.” Id. 2018As stated, the Act provides that "[i]f a court determines after hearing that any rule or condition of release has been violated, * * * it may revoke the order for conditional release and order that the released person be placed in an appropriate institution until the person is discharged from the commitment under * * * this Act or until again placed on conditional release under * * * this Act." Id. | 3 | 2018–2019 |
Central City Education Ass'n v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences2011If it is, then the second part of the test requires a determination of whether the matter is also one of "inherent managerial authority." Central City, 149 Ill.2d at 523 , 174 Ill.Dec. 808 , 599 N.E.2d 892 . 2011If it is, then the second part of the test requires a determination of whether the matter is also one of "inherent managerial authority." Central City, 149 Ill.2d at 523 , 174 Ill.Dec. 808 , 599 N.E.2d 892 . | 3 | 2002–2011 |
In Re Marriage of Velasquez
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2018Velasquez , 295 Ill. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences2017The second part of the test provides that if the new law contains no “express provision regarding the temporal reach, the court must determine whether applying the statute would have a ‘retroactive’ or ‘retrospective’ impact; that is, ‘whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Id. - 15 No. 1-16-1780 (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280 ). 2017The second part of the test provides that if the new law contains no “express provision regarding the temporal reach, the court must determine whether applying the statute would have a ‘retroactive’ or ‘retrospective’ impact; that is, ‘whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Id. (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280 ). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Landgraf v. USI Film Products
green
2 sentences2017The second part of the test provides that if the new law contains no “express provision regarding the temporal reach, the court must determine whether applying the statute would have a ‘retroactive’ or ‘retrospective’ impact; that is, ‘whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Id. - 15 No. 1-16-1780 (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280 ). 2017The second part of the test provides that if the new law contains no “express provision regarding the temporal reach, the court must determine whether applying the statute would have a ‘retroactive’ or ‘retrospective’ impact; that is, ‘whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Id. (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280 ). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Minch v. George
green
2 sentences2015Id. ¶ 98 Here, we review whether the court's finding at the directed finding stage was against the manifest weight of the evidence because the court engaged in the second part of the analysis. 2015Id. ¶ 98 Here, we review whether the court’s finding at the directed finding stage was against the manifest weight of the evidence because the court engaged in the second part of the analysis. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Roper v. Simmons
green
2 sentences2011Roper, 543 U.S. at 564 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 ; Graham, 560 U.S. at ___ , 130 S.Ct. at 2026 . 2011Roper, 543 U.S. at 564 ; Graham, 560 U.S. at ___, 130 S. Ct. at 2026. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
green
2 sentences2008“Interested in Appealing” Prong of Flores-Ortega Test The second part of the test requires us to determine whether “there is reason to think *** that this particular defendant reasonably demonstrated to counsel that he was interested in appealing.” Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. at 480 , 145 L. 2008“Interested in Appealing” Prong of Flores-Ortega Test The second part of the test requires us to determine whether “there is reason to think *** that this particular defendant reasonably demonstrated to counsel that he was interested in appealing.” Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. at 480 , 145 L. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Hall
green
2 sentences2005Hall, 352 Ill.App.3d at 549 , 287 Ill.Dec. 736 , 816 N.E.2d at 714 . 2005Hall, 352 Ill. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Afl-Cio (Afscme) v. Dept. of Cent. Mgt.
green
2 sentences2005It recognized that, under AFSCME and federal cases applying the public-policy doctrine, an arbitrator's reinstatement of an employee such as DuBose must be upheld "as long as the arbitrator makes a rational finding that the employee can be trusted to refrain from the offending conduct." DuBose , 173 Ill. 2d at 322 ; see also Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International , 808 F.2d 76 (D.C. 2005It recognized that, under AFSCME and federal cases applying the public-policy doctrine, an arbitrator’s reinstatement of an employee such as DuBose must be upheld “as long as the arbitrator makes a rational finding that the employee can be trusted to refrain from the offending conduct.” DuBose, 173 Ill. 2d at 322 ; see also Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, International, 808 F.2d 76 (D.C. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Olinger
green
2 sentences2002Olinger , 176 Ill. 2d at 354 . 2002Olinger, 176 Ill. 2d at 354 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Costello v. Unarco Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2000App. 3d at 695 , 663 N.E.2d at 21 , citing Costello, 111 Ill. 2d at 483 , 490 N.E.2d at 678 . 2000App. 3d at 695 , 663 N.E.2d at 21 , citing Costello, 111 Ill. 2d at 483 , 490 N.E.2d at 678 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Goodman v. Harbor Market, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2000As to the second part of the test, the Goodman court does note that the reasonable period “can never be more than the repose period itself.” Goodman, 278 Ill. 2000As to the second part of the test, the Goodman court does note that the reasonable period "can never be more than the repose period itself." Goodman , 278 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
McRand, Inc. v. Van Beelen
green
2 sentences1998McRand , 138 Ill. 1998McRand, 138 Ill. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
City of Evanston v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences1995A managerial employee is "an individual [who] directs the effectuation of management policy when he oversees or coordinates policy implementation by developing the means and methods of achieving policy objectives and by determining the extent to which the objectives will be achieved.” (City of Evanston, 227 Ill. 1993(Freeport, 227 Ill. | 2 | 1993–1995 |
People v. Vesey
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
| County of Cook v. Illinois Labor Relations Board—Local Panel green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees v. State of Illinois green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Hearn v. Rhay green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Pappas v. Holloway green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| The Department of Central Management Services v. The Illinois Labor Relations Board green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| People v. Thomas green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| People v. Woolley green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In Re Estate of Goldstein green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| People v. Hudson green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| People v. Burgess green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Leong v. Village of Schaumburg green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Spiros Lounge, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Commission green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Chief Judge of Sixteenth Judicial Circuit v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Grossinger Motorcorp, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| People v. Johnson green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Elg v. Whittington green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Agrimerica, Inc. v. Mathes green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Overbey v. Illinois Farmers Insurance green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| People v. Albanese green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company v. National Labor Relations Board green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Canfield v. Spear green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Business Development Services, Inc. v. Field Container Corp. green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Bennett & Kahnweiler Associates v. Ratner green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Cockerill v. Wilson green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.