6 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-Appellantsgreen1 sentence2018In claiming the money, the Petitioner was expected to “show by a preponderance of the evidence an alternate source for the funds” which requires more than just a possibility of a 9 In re Matter ofOne Mercedes BenzAuto., 644 A.2d 423, at fn. 5 , citing $38, 000. 00 in Um`ted States Currency, 816 F.2d 1538, 1543 (l lth Cir. 1987) (recognizing that a claimant need not own the property to have standing to contest its forfeiture, but rather a lawful possessory interest is sufficient). legitimate source for the cash.10 Petitioner (1) did not provide sufficient evidence that the cash was related to l | 1 | 1 |
McMann v. Richardsongreen2 sentences2017The plea and sentence appear manifestly reasonable Among other charges, Mr. Pickle was indicted with twenty-six counts of rape in the third degree, which carry a collective maximum penalty of six-hundred and fifty years of level five incarceration Pursuant to his plea deal, Mr. Pickle was sentenced to only twenty-five years of incarceration-less than four percent of the 17 Ia'. 18 See id. at 56 (citing McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 (1970)). 19 Id. 11 State v. Robert J. 2017The plea and sentence appear manifestly reasonable Among other charges, Mr. Pickle was indicted with twenty-six counts of rape in the third degree, which carry a collective maximum penalty of six-hundred and fifty years of level five incarceration Pursuant to his plea deal, Mr. Pickle was sentenced to only twenty-five years of incarceration-less than four percent of the 17 Ia'. 18 See id. at 56 (citing McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 (1970)). 19 Id. 11 State v. Robert J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Council of the Devon
green
1 sentence2026Oct. 1, 2018), aff’d, 198 A.3d 724 (Del. 2018) (discussing carve-outs in the MAE context). 66 Mark III APA § 4.12(d). 67 Mark III APA, Schedule 4.12(d). - 13 - states which properties have and don’t have “direct access.”68 Crucially, however, the Schedule doesn’t state that the Seller lacks or is not transferring the as- previously-Section-warranted indirect access to any location.69 The absence of direct access triggers the second part of the clause, namely that the Seller possesses indirect access—“the legal and transferrable right either by easement or license to such commercially reasonabl | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2025R. 61 (June 4, 2014); Cooke, 2025 WL 16395 , at *23. 28 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 12 reasonableness,”29 and (ii) “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”30 Under the first part of the Strickland test—the performance prong—there is “a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”31 Where “an attorney makes a strategic choice after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options,” the presumption that an attorney acted re | 1 | 2025–2025 |
A.W. v. Marelli
green
2 sentences2025The Plaintiffs’ emotional well-being is not at the core of their claim in the way it is in the narrow cases in the Restatement and Mower. 60 Id. at 793 . 61 Id. 62 Id. (quoting Restatement (Third) of Torts § 47 cmt. f). 63 A.W., 543 P.3d at 793 . 12 Because parties do not dispute Plaintiffs were not within the zone of danger, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s partial summary judgment for Plaintiff’s NIED claim. 2025The Plaintiffs’ emotional well-being is not at the core of their claim in the way it is in the narrow cases in the Restatement and Mower. 60 Id. at 793 . 61 Id. 62 Id. (quoting Restatement (Third) of Torts § 47 cmt. f). 63 A.W., 543 P.3d at 793 . 12 Because parties do not dispute Plaintiffs were not within the zone of danger, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s partial summary judgment for Plaintiff’s NIED claim. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re One 1985 Mercedes Benz Automobile
green
1 sentence2018In claiming the money, the Petitioner was expected to “show by a preponderance of the evidence an alternate source for the funds” which requires more than just a possibility of a 9 In re Matter ofOne Mercedes BenzAuto., 644 A.2d 423, at fn. 5 , citing $38, 000. 00 in Um`ted States Currency, 816 F.2d 1538, 1543 (l lth Cir. 1987) (recognizing that a claimant need not own the property to have standing to contest its forfeiture, but rather a lawful possessory interest is sufficient). legitimate source for the cash.10 Petitioner (1) did not provide sufficient evidence that the cash was related to l | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Camac v. Hall
green
1 sentence1997Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.