9 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte JEgreen2 sentences2016“If the trial court determines, based on all relevant factors, that grounds exist for terminating parental rights, then the court must proceed to the second part of its analysis, which is to consider whether all viable alternatives to terminating parental rights have been exhausted.” Ex parte J.E., 1 So.3d 1002, 1008 (Ala.2008)(citing Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 954 ). 2014“If the trial court determines, based on all relevant factors, that grounds exist for terminating parental rights, then the court must proceed to the second part of its analysis, which is to consider whether all viable alternatives to terminating parental rights have been exhausted.” Ex parte J.E., 1 So.3d at 1008 (citing Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 954 ). | 1 | 3 |
Ex Parte McLeodgreen1 sentence2012Ex parte McLeod, 718 So.2d 682, 690 (Ala.1997) ("An administrative agency's interpretation of a statute will not be given deference if it is contrary to the legislative intent.”). | 1 | 1 |
Morris Concrete, Inc. v. Warrickgreen1 sentence2011See Morris Concrete, Inc. v. Warrick, 868 So.2d 429, 438-40 (Ala.Civ.App.2003) (stating that emotional-distress damages are generally not recoverable on a breach-of-contract claim and listing specific exceptions to that general rule); and Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 827 So.2d 63, 69, 70 (Ala.2001) (stating that “it would violate the purpose for which the zone-of-danger rule [there specifically referring to the second part of the test articulated in AALAR ] was created to apply that rule in a breach-of-contract case” and also stating that the rule does not apply to breach-of-warranty cases | 1 | 1 |
Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.green1 sentence2011See Morris Concrete, Inc. v. Warrick, 868 So.2d 429, 438-40 (Ala.Civ.App.2003) (stating that emotional-distress damages are generally not recoverable on a breach-of-contract claim and listing specific exceptions to that general rule); and Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 827 So.2d 63, 69, 70 (Ala.2001) (stating that “it would violate the purpose for which the zone-of-danger rule [there specifically referring to the second part of the test articulated in AALAR ] was created to apply that rule in a breach-of-contract case” and also stating that the rule does not apply to breach-of-warranty cases | 1 | 1 |
Wages v. Stategreen2 sentences1976In applying the second part of the test, we must "... accord to the lawmaking body of the state government sincerity of purpose and fairness in dealing with the people of the state." Wages v. State, 225 Ala. 2, 4 , 141 So. 707, 708 (1932). 1976In applying the second part of the test, we must "... accord to the lawmaking body of the state government sincerity of purpose and fairness in dealing with the people of the state." Wages v. State, 225 Ala. 2, 4 , 141 So. 707, 708 (1932). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Beasley
green
2 sentences2016“If the trial court determines, based on all relevant factors, that grounds exist for terminating parental rights, then the court must proceed to the second part of its analysis, which is to consider whether all viable alternatives to terminating parental rights have been exhausted.” Ex parte J.E., 1 So.3d 1002, 1008 (Ala.2008)(citing Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 954 ). 2014“If the trial court determines, based on all relevant factors, that grounds exist for terminating parental rights, then the court must proceed to the second part of its analysis, which is to consider whether all viable alternatives to terminating parental rights have been exhausted.” Ex parte J.E., 1 So.3d at 1008 (citing Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 954 ). | 4 | 2008–2016 |
Hopper v. Evans
green
2 sentences1986We do not believe the United States Supreme Court meant for such a restrictive interpretation to be applied to the preclusion-clause-effect test when it posed the second part of the test in Hopper v. Evans , 456 U.S. 605 , 102 S.Ct. 2049 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982). 1986We do not believe the United States Supreme Court meant for such a restrictive interpretation to be applied to the preclusion-clause-effect test when it posed the second part of the test in Hopper v. Evans , 456 U.S. 605 , 102 S.Ct. 2049 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.