limitation exception in Connecticut

14 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1856–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Giglio v. United Statesgreen scotus · 1972 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 2 sentences 2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 345 Conn. 174, 205 , 283 A.3d 477 (2022); see also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 153-54, 92 S. Ct. 763 , 31 L. Ed. 2d 104 (1972); Napue 2 The record establishes that the prosecutor requested, and was granted, a limitation on defense counsel’s cross-examination of Martinez regarding his prior invocation of his privilege against self-incrimination. 2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 345 Conn. 174, 205 , 283 A.3d 477 (2022); see also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 153-54, 92 S. Ct. 763 , 31 L. Ed. 2d 104 (1972); Napue 2 The record establishes that the prosecutor requested, and was granted, a limitation on defense counsel’s cross-examination of Martinez regarding his prior invocation of his privilege against self-incrimination.	1	1
State v. Johnsongreen conn · 2022 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 2 sentences 2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 345 Conn. 174, 205 , 283 A.3d 477 (2022); see also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 153-54, 92 S. Ct. 763 , 31 L. Ed. 2d 104 (1972); Napue 2 The record establishes that the prosecutor requested, and was granted, a limitation on defense counsel’s cross-examination of Martinez regarding his prior invocation of his privilege against self-incrimination. 2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 345 Conn. 174, 205 , 283 A.3d 477 (2022); see also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 153-54, 92 S. Ct. 763 , 31 L. Ed. 2d 104 (1972); Napue 2 The record establishes that the prosecutor requested, and was granted, a limitation on defense counsel’s cross-examination of Martinez regarding his prior invocation of his privilege against self-incrimination.	1	1
Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grossogreen conn · 1997 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006It is important to emphasize, however, the limitation of this principle to the extent that it “embraces alike those [laws] which affect [the contract’s] validity, construction, discharge, and enforcement!’ (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Dept. of Liquor Control, supra, 213 Conn. 199 ; see, e.g., Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grosso, 240 Conn. 58 , 76-77 n.18, 689 A.2d 1097 (1997) (“whenever there is an attorney’s fees clause in the commercial party’s contract, that clause is subject to [General Statutes] § 42-150aa, and the contract must be read as inco 2006It is important to emphasize, however, the limitation of this principle to the extent that it “embraces alike those [laws] which affect [the contract’s] validity, construction, discharge, and enforcement!’ (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Dept. of Liquor Control, supra, 213 Conn. 199 ; see, e.g., Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grosso, 240 Conn. 58 , 76-77 n.18, 689 A.2d 1097 (1997) (“whenever there is an attorney’s fees clause in the commercial party’s contract, that clause is subject to [General Statutes] § 42-150aa, and the contract must be read as inco	1	1
Kaminski v. Town of Fairfieldgreen conn · 1990 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Thus, we stated: “Exposing the negligent taxpayer to liability for having summoned the police would impose upon him multiple burdens for that protection.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 39 . 2004Second, although, in rejecting the claim of a duty to warn, we used language and cited some out-of-state cases that appear to apply beyond the confines of landowner’s liability; see, e.g., id., 38-39 ; our principal rationale was consistent with the limitation of the rule to premises liability cases, namely, the risk of double taxation.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (22)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Brown green conn · 1990 2 sentences 2011Thereafter, in State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 109 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990), the Appellate Court held that a violation of § 14-227a “constituted a violation of that condition of [the defendant’s] probation order forbidding [the defendant] from violating ‘any criminal law’ of this state.” Prior to reaching that conclusion, however, the Appellate Court, on the basis of the analysis in Kluttz , concluded that “for purposes of ... § 53a-24 (a), § 14-227a is a motor vehicle violation and not a ‘crime.’ ” Id., 111. 2011Thereafter, in State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 109 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990), the Appellate Court held that a violation of § 14-227a “constituted a violation of that condition of [the defendant’s] probation order forbidding [the defendant] from violating ‘any criminal law’ of this state.” Prior to reaching that conclusion, however, the Appellate Court, on the basis of the analysis in Kluttz , concluded that “for purposes of ... § 53a-24 (a), § 14-227a is a motor vehicle violation and not a ‘crime.’ ” Id., 111.	1	2011–2011
State v. Brown green connappct · 1990 2 sentences 2011Thereafter, in State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 109 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990), the Appellate Court held that a violation of § 14-227a “constituted a violation of that condition of [the defendant’s] probation order forbidding [the defendant] from violating ‘any criminal law’ of this state.” Prior to reaching that conclusion, however, the Appellate Court, on the basis of the analysis in Kluttz , concluded that “for purposes of ... § 53a-24 (a), § 14-227a is a motor vehicle violation and not a ‘crime.’ ” Id., 111. 2011Thereafter, in State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 109 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990), the Appellate Court held that a violation of § 14-227a “constituted a violation of that condition of [the defendant’s] probation order forbidding [the defendant] from violating ‘any criminal law’ of this state.” Prior to reaching that conclusion, however, the Appellate Court, on the basis of the analysis in Kluttz , concluded that “for purposes of ... § 53a-24 (a), § 14-227a is a motor vehicle violation and not a ‘crime.’ ” Id., 111.	1	2011–2011
Sanghavi v. Paul Revere Life Insurance green conn · 1990 2 sentences 2006Co., 214 Conn. 303, 307 , 572 A.2d 307 (1990) (concluding that income option rider to disability insurance policy was invalid because it violated insurance law under then General Statutes § 38-167, now General Statutes § 38a-483). 2006Co., 214 Conn. 303, 307 , 572 A.2d 307 (1990) (concluding that income option rider to disability insurance policy was invalid because it violated insurance law under then General Statutes § 38-167, now General Statutes § 38a-483).	1	2006–2006
Leon's Bakery, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp. green ca2 · 1993 1 sentence 2002Leon's Bakery, Inc. v. Industrial Electric Service, Inc. , 990 F.2d 44 CT Page 12984 (2nd.	1	2002–2002
Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. green connappct · 1985 2 sentences 2002Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 5 Conn. App. 643, 648 , 501 A.2d 1223 (1985). 2002Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 5 Conn. App. 643, 648 , 501 A.2d 1223 (1985).	1	2002–2002
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Retirement Management Group, Inc. green connappct · 1993 1 sentence 1996In Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Retirement Management Group, Inc., 31 Conn. App. 80 , 84-85 , that court stated "As long as the [the] defendant is fully apprised of a claim arising from specified conduct and has prepared to defend the action, his ability to protect himself will not be prejudicially affected if a new plaintiff is added, and he should not be permitted to invoke a limitation defense. . . .	1	1996–1996
Smith v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America green conn · 1993 1 sentence 1996Co. of America, 225 Conn. 566 , 574 (1993), the court is not permitted to review the policy to determine its validity, and subsequently the validity of the defendant's special defense, on a motion to strike.	1	1996–1996
Joslin v. Joslin green ri · 1939 1 sentence 1995Joslin v. Joslin, 6 A.2d 456 , 459 , 62 R.	1	1995–1995
Pickering v. American Employers Insurance green ri · 1971 1 sentence 1991The limitation which such a clause places on the recovery of an insured injured by an uninsured motorist is contrary to the intent of the statute to protect the insured against his actual loss; the statute unequivocally states, as we have held before, that "each policy issued must supply the required minimum degree of protection." Id. at 152-53, 282 A.2d at 590 .	1	1991–1991
Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc. neutral nmctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M.	1	1986–1986
Klang v. Shell Oil Co. green calctapp · 1971 2 sentences 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M.	1	1986–1986
Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co. v. Leach green ga · 1893 2 sentences 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M.	1	1986–1986
Tarnowski v. Fite green mich · 1952 2 sentences 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M.	1	1986–1986
Sulpher Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo green arizctapp · 1971 2 sentences 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1986Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo, 14 Ariz. App. 141, 144 , 481 P.2d 511 (1971); Klang v. Shell Oil Co., 17 Cal. App. 3d 933, 938-40 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 265 (1971); Air-line Railway Co. v. Leach, 91 Ga. 419, 422 , 17 S.E. 619 (1893); Tarnowski v. Fite, 335 Mich. 267, 269-70 , 55 N.W.2d 824 (1952); Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc., 99 N.M. 121, 123-24 , 654 P.2d 574 (N.M.	1	1986–1986
Moore v. Miller green colo · 1979 2 sentences 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim. 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim.	1	1984–1984
Consalvi neutral massappct · 1977 1 sentence 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim.	1	1984–1984
Crabtree v. State neutral mont · 1980 2 sentences 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim. 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim.	1	1984–1984
Olson v. Thurston green me · 1978 1 sentence 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim.	1	1984–1984
Ex Parte Cain green texcrimapp · 1980 1 sentence 1984Other courts have so held. 7 See, e.g., Moore v. Miller, 198 Colo. 24 , 596 P.2d 64 (1979); In re Consalvi, 5 Mass. App. 729, 370 N.E.2d 707 (1977); Olson v. Thurston, 393 A.2d 1320 (Me. 1978); Crabtree v. State, 186 Mont. 340 , 607 P.2d 566 (1980); Ex parte Cain, 592 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. Crim.	1	1984–1984
Caldwell Co. v. Lea green tenn · 1924 2 sentences 1931But a classification of loans according to the amounts involved is a not unusual feature of legislation for the protection of borrowers, upon the ground that those who seek loans of larger sums “do not require the same protection as do others less fortunately endowed.” Caldwell & Co. v. Lea, 152 Tenn. 48, 54 , 272 S. W. 715 ; State v. Wickenhoefer, 6 Pen. 1931But a classification of loans according to the amounts involved is a not unusual feature of legislation for the protection of borrowers, upon the ground that those who seek loans of larger sums “do not require the same protection as do others less fortunately endowed.” Caldwell & Co. v. Lea, 152 Tenn. 48, 54 , 272 S. W. 715 ; State v. Wickenhoefer, 6 Pen.	1	1931–1931
Carey v. Berkshire Railroad red mass · 1848 1 sentence 1856Co., 1 Cush., 475 .) But such actions, if countenanced, would furnish no sound apology for a limitation of the principle which they involved, and when tested by argument, have invariably been discouraged.	1	1856–1856
Ford v. Monroe yellow nysupct · 1838 1 sentence 1856The case of Ford v. Monroe, 20 Wend., 210 , is not only an anomaly on the score of principle, but anomalous by reason of the fact that a question so momentous as the right to treat death as an actionable injury, was overlooked both by counsel and the court, in every stage of the case.	1	1856–1856

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 114 (1880–2025) NY 103 (1849–2025) CA 88 (1902–2026) IL 85 (1874–2026) PA 50 (1828–2021) FL 41 (1944–2026) MO 40 (1878–2024) AL 28 (1876–2015) MD 27 (1879–2021) WA 25 (1896–2024) MI 23 (1889–2023) MA 22 (1838–2015) NC 19 (1904–2022) WI 19 (1897–2016) NJ 19 (1856–2023) MN 19 (1884–2015) GA 18 (1895–2023) OH 17 (1888–2026) TN 17 (1940–2024) VT 17 (1881–2024) CO 17 (1903–2026) MS 17 (1925–2022) IA 16 (1885–2023) OK 16 (1915–2016) VA 16 (1971–2025) KY 15 (1901–2024) CT 14 (1856–2026) OR 14 (1902–2025) WY 13 (1879–2025) LA 12 (1945–2016) NM 12 (1893–2011) KS 12 (1873–2002) IN 10 (1871–2007) SC 8 (1967–2023) DC 8 (1973–2022) ME 7 (1887–2022) ID 7 (1926–2014) WV 7 (1893–1999) HI 7 (1908–2025) ND 6 (1890–2017) SD 6 (1928–2011) AZ 6 (1936–2017) AR 5 (1941–2016) NH 4 (1912–2024) MT 4 (1932–2000) UT 4 (1964–2020) AK 3 (1977–1984) DE 3 (1966–2026) NE 3 (1894–2022) RI 3 (1960–2011) MP 2 (2026–2026) NV 2 (1939–2017) PR 2 (1945–1956)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance