90 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Gatesgreen2 sentences2000"In Williams v. State , 565 So.2d 1233 , 1236 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), this Court found that there was probable cause to arrest the appellant's accomplice. `The information obtained from the anonymous telephone informant and corroborated by the sheriff's department satisfied the totality-of-the-circumstances test for determining probable cause set out in Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).' Williams , 565 So.2d at 1235 . 2000"In Williams v. State , 565 So.2d 1233 , 1236 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), this Court found that there was probable cause to arrest the appellant's accomplice. `The information obtained from the anonymous telephone informant and corroborated by the sheriff's department satisfied the totality-of-the-circumstances test for determining probable cause set out in Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).' Williams , 565 So.2d at 1235 . | 7 | 39 |
Jones v. United Statesred2 sentences1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). 1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). | 6 | 6 |
Powers v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See, e.g., Powers v. State , 38 So.3d 764 , 765 (Ala. Crim. 2018See, e.g., Powers v. State , 38 So.3d 764 , 765 (Ala. Crim. | 4 | 4 |
Bishop v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Illinois v. *Page 369 Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). " '[A]n informant's "veracity," "reliability," and "basis of knowledge" are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report' and are 'relevant considerations in the totality-of-the circumstances analysis that traditionally has guided probable cause determinations: a deficiency in one may be compensated for, in determining the overall reliability of a tip, by a strong showing as to the other, or by some other indicia of reliability.' " Bishop v. State , 518 So.2d 829 , 831 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987), quoting 1989As Judge Bowen wrote in Bishop v. State, 518 So.2d 829, 831 (Ala.Cr.App.1987): “Although the two-pronged test of Aguilar-Spinelli has been abandoned, it has not been forgotten. ‘[A]n informant’s “veracity”, “reliability,” and “basis of knowledge” are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report’ and are ‘relevant considerations in the totality-of-the circumstances analysis that traditionally has guided probable-cause determinations: a deficiency in one may be compensated for, in determining the overall reliability of a tip, by a strong showing as to the other, or by some other in | 2 | 6 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences1997The defendant's personal characteristics as well as his prior experience with the criminal justice system are factors to be considered in determining his susceptibility to police pressures." Jackson , 562 So.2d at 1380-81 (citations omitted). 1995See also Jackson v. State, 562 So.2d 1373, 1381 (Ala.Cr.App.1990) (applying a totality of the circumstances analysis, this court found an accused to be sufficiently "street-wise" and "socially promoted," despite his tenth-grade education and his difficulty in reading). | 2 | 2 |
Haley v. Ohiogreen2 sentences1991See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Parker. 1991See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Parker. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Ventrescagreen2 sentences1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). 1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). | 1 | 7 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2000"In Williams v. State , 565 So.2d 1233 , 1236 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), this Court found that there was probable cause to arrest the appellant's accomplice. `The information obtained from the anonymous telephone informant and corroborated by the sheriff's department satisfied the totality-of-the-circumstances test for determining probable cause set out in Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).' Williams , 565 So.2d at 1235 . 1991"The information obtained from the anonymous telephone informant and corroborated by the sheriff's department satisfies the totality-of-the-circumstances test for determining probable cause set out in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)." Williams, 565 So.2d at 1235 . | 1 | 3 |
| Hairgrove v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. John J. Maguire, United States v. Thomas M. Kavanagh, United States v. Robert A. Hickeygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Adams v. Williamsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brooks v. City of Dothan Police Dept.green | 1 | 1 |
| McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Holder v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Davis v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte City of Gadsden
green
2 sentences2000“Actual physical control” is determined by “a totality-of-the-circumstances test.” Car gle, 495 So.2d at 1145 . 1988"It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that the statement given by Defendant subsequent to [five and one-half hours after] his arrest was voluntarily and knowingly made and is therefore not due to be suppressed." In Cagle v. City of Gadsden , 495 So.2d 1144 , 1147 (Ala. 1986), our Supreme Court held that, in a prosecution for DUI, in determining whether a motorist, who was not actually seen driving the vehicle, had "actual physical control" over the vehicle, a totality-of-the-circumstances test is to be employed. | 7 | 1987–2000 |
Aguilar v. Texas
red
2 sentences1987“Based on the information of the informant and on the subsequent surveillance of the residence I hereby request that a search warrant be issued for 1462 Eagle Drive.” This affidavit is sufficient under the totality of the circumstances standard for determining the existence of probable cause adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983): “[W]e conclude that it is wiser to abandon the ‘two-pronged test’ established by our decisions in Aguilar [v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) ], and Spinelli [v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 1987“Based on the information of the informant and on the subsequent surveillance of the residence I hereby request that a search warrant be issued for 1462 Eagle Drive.” This affidavit is sufficient under the totality of the circumstances standard for determining the existence of probable cause adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983): “[W]e conclude that it is wiser to abandon the ‘two-pronged test’ established by our decisions in Aguilar [v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) ], and Spinelli [v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 | 7 | 1983–1990 |
Brinegar v. United States
green
2 sentences1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). 1989See Jones v. United States , [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)]; United States v. Ventresca , 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Brinegar v. United States , 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). | 7 | 1984–1989 |
Spinelli v. United States
red
2 sentences1987“Based on the information of the informant and on the subsequent surveillance of the residence I hereby request that a search warrant be issued for 1462 Eagle Drive.” This affidavit is sufficient under the totality of the circumstances standard for determining the existence of probable cause adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983): “[W]e conclude that it is wiser to abandon the ‘two-pronged test’ established by our decisions in Aguilar [v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) ], and Spinelli [v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 1987“Based on the information of the informant and on the subsequent surveillance of the residence I hereby request that a search warrant be issued for 1462 Eagle Drive.” This affidavit is sufficient under the totality of the circumstances standard for determining the existence of probable cause adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983): “[W]e conclude that it is wiser to abandon the ‘two-pronged test’ established by our decisions in Aguilar [v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) ], and Spinelli [v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 | 6 | 1983–1990 |
James T. Caver v. State of Alabama
green
2 sentences1983Caver v. Alabama , 537 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1973). 1983Caver v. Alabama , 537 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1976). | 6 | 1979–1983 |
Simmons v. United States
green
2 sentences1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa 1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa | 5 | 1979–1987 |
Stovall v. Denno
green
2 sentences1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa 1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa | 4 | 1983–1987 |
Brazell v. State
green
2 sentences1985In the recent case of Cooley v. State , 439 So.2d 193 , 195 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), however, this court held that "the mere fact that the appellant was subjected to a one-man showup does not necessarily render that identification procedure impermissively suggestive." (Emphasis in original.) In reaching this conclusion, this court in Cooley reasoned as follows: "`Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the "totality of the circumstances." [Citations omitted.] This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification 1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa | 4 | 1983–1985 |
Davis v. State
green
2 sentences1999Cagle v. City of Gadsden , 495 So.2d 1144 (Ala. 1986)." Davis v. State , 505 So.2d 1303 , 1305 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987) (emphasis added). 1991Even without the defendant's admissions, the State's evidence was, under a totality-of-the-circumstances test, "inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis that the defendant [was] innocent." Davis , 505 So.2d at 1305 . | 3 | 1988–1999 |
Massachusetts v. Upton
green
2 sentences1993Under the totality of the circumstances test of Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and Massachusetts v. Upton, 466 U.S. 727 , 104 S.Ct. 2085 , 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984), this affidavit contains sufficient indicia of reliability of the informant’s information and provides a substantial basis for crediting the hearsay of the confidential informant. “[T]he legal sufficiency of a search warrant affidavit should not be determined by a process of isolated dissection. 1993Under the totality of the circumstances test of Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and Massachusetts v. Upton, 466 U.S. 727 , 104 S.Ct. 2085 , 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984), this affidavit contains sufficient indicia of reliability of the informant’s information and provides a substantial basis for crediting the hearsay of the confidential informant. “[T]he legal sufficiency of a search warrant affidavit should not be determined by a process of isolated dissection. | 3 | 1985–1993 |
Louis West v. United States
green
2 sentences1984West v. United States , 399 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1968). 1977“Using those criteria pronounced in West v. United States, supra, we now proceed to examine the totality of the circumstances under which the confession of the appellant was made.” 1. | 3 | 1977–1984 |
Neil v. Biggers
green
2 sentences1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa 1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa | 3 | 1983–1983 |
Coleman v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa 1983In Brazell v. State , 369 So.2d 25 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), this court stated that: "Whether an out-of-court identification procedure has violated due process depends upon the `totality of the circumstances.' Stovall , [ 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ] supra; Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Coleman , [ 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ] supra; Biggers , [ 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 ] supra. This totality of the circumstances test is the standard in deciding whether an identification procedure is unnecessa | 3 | 1983–1983 |
Rider v. State
green
2 sentences2011Applying the totality-of-the-circumstances standard, the court found that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of either physical force or a threat, express or implied. 544 So.2d at 996 . 1991Applying the totality-of-the-circumstances standard, the court found that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of either physical force or a threat, express or implied. 544 So.2d at 996 . | 2 | 1991–2011 |
Magwood v. State
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). 1998Edwards v. Arizona , 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd , 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). | 2 | 1998–1999 |
Ex Parte Magwood
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). 1998Edwards v. Arizona , 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd , 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). | 2 | 1998–1999 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). 1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). | 2 | 1998–1999 |
McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). 1998Edwards v. Arizona , 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd , 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). | 2 | 1998–1999 |
Walker v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). 1999Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986). | 2 | 1998–1999 |
Beecher v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1996Boulden v. Holman , 394 U.S. 478 [, 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 ] (1969); Beecher v. Alabama , 389 U.S. 35 [, 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 ] (1967); Eakes v. State , 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). `The true test of determining whether extra-judicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed and therefore not the product of a rational intellect and a free will. 1996Boulden v. Holman , 394 U.S. 478 [, 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 ] (1969); Beecher v. Alabama , 389 U.S. 35 [, 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 ] (1967); Eakes v. State , 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). `The true test of determining whether extra-judicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed and therefore not the product of a rational intellect and a free will. | 2 | 1995–1996 |
Boulden v. Holman
green
2 sentences1996Boulden v. Holman , 394 U.S. 478 [, 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 ] (1969); Beecher v. Alabama , 389 U.S. 35 [, 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 ] (1967); Eakes v. State , 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). `The true test of determining whether extra-judicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed and therefore not the product of a rational intellect and a free will. 1996Boulden v. Holman , 394 U.S. 478 [, 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 ] (1969); Beecher v. Alabama , 389 U.S. 35 [, 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 ] (1967); Eakes v. State , 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). `The true test of determining whether extra-judicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed and therefore not the product of a rational intellect and a free will. | 2 | 1995–1996 |
Eakes v. State
green
2 sentences1996Boulden v. Holman , 394 U.S. 478 [, 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 ] (1969); Beecher v. Alabama , 389 U.S. 35 [, 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 ] (1967); Eakes v. State , 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). `The true test of determining whether extra-judicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed and therefore not the product of a rational intellect and a free will. 1995Boulden v. Holman, 394 U.S. 478 , 89 S.Ct. 1138 , 22 L.Ed.2d 433 (1969); Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 , 88 S.Ct. 189 , 19 L.Ed.2d 35 (1967); Eakes v. State, 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Cr.App.1978). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
| Manson v. Brathwaite green | 2 | 1979–1984 |
| Cobble v. State green | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| EC v. State green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Ex Parte Gaddy green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| United States v. Henry T. Lane, A/K/A Dutch, A/K/A Henry T, (Two Cases) green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Moorman v. State green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| United States v. Harris green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Ex Parte Beck green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Zatko v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Stott v. Caspari green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Griffith v. United States green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Barnett v. State neutral | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Jorden v. Estelle green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Crawford v. Little green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Fisher v. Washington green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| North Carolina v. Butler red | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Parrish v. State green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Ex Parte Weeks green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.