Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ritter v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Jimmy v. State , 206 P.3d 750 , 751 (Alaska App. 2009) ; Grandstaff v. State , 171 P.3d 1176 , 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007) ; Ritter v. State , 97 P.3d 73 , 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004) ; Nicholson v. State , 656 P.2d 1209 , 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 2019See, e.g., Jimmy v. State, 206 P.3d 750, 751 (Alaska App. 2009); Grandstaff v. State, 171 P.3d 1176, 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007); Ritter v. State, 97 P.3d 73, 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004); Nicholson v. State, 656 P.2d 1209, 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 10 Townsend, 2011 WL 4107008 , at *1. –7– 2638 In Townsend, T.M. and his fiancée were walking through a crowded bar, brushing against people.11 Townsend, dressed in drag, approached T.M. and grabbed T.M.’s penis (through T.M.’s clothing) for a few seconds. | 1 | 1 |
Nicholson v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Jimmy v. State , 206 P.3d 750 , 751 (Alaska App. 2009) ; Grandstaff v. State , 171 P.3d 1176 , 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007) ; Ritter v. State , 97 P.3d 73 , 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004) ; Nicholson v. State , 656 P.2d 1209 , 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 2019See, e.g., Jimmy v. State, 206 P.3d 750, 751 (Alaska App. 2009); Grandstaff v. State, 171 P.3d 1176, 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007); Ritter v. State, 97 P.3d 73, 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004); Nicholson v. State, 656 P.2d 1209, 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 10 Townsend, 2011 WL 4107008 , at *1. –7– 2638 In Townsend, T.M. and his fiancée were walking through a crowded bar, brushing against people.11 Townsend, dressed in drag, approached T.M. and grabbed T.M.’s penis (through T.M.’s clothing) for a few seconds. | 1 | 1 |
Jimmy v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Jimmy v. State , 206 P.3d 750 , 751 (Alaska App. 2009) ; Grandstaff v. State , 171 P.3d 1176 , 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007) ; Ritter v. State , 97 P.3d 73 , 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004) ; Nicholson v. State , 656 P.2d 1209 , 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 2019See, e.g., Jimmy v. State, 206 P.3d 750, 751 (Alaska App. 2009); Grandstaff v. State, 171 P.3d 1176, 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007); Ritter v. State, 97 P.3d 73, 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004); Nicholson v. State, 656 P.2d 1209, 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 10 Townsend, 2011 WL 4107008 , at *1. –7– 2638 In Townsend, T.M. and his fiancée were walking through a crowded bar, brushing against people.11 Townsend, dressed in drag, approached T.M. and grabbed T.M.’s penis (through T.M.’s clothing) for a few seconds. | 1 | 1 |
Grandstaff v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Jimmy v. State , 206 P.3d 750 , 751 (Alaska App. 2009) ; Grandstaff v. State , 171 P.3d 1176 , 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007) ; Ritter v. State , 97 P.3d 73 , 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004) ; Nicholson v. State , 656 P.2d 1209 , 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 2019See, e.g., Jimmy v. State, 206 P.3d 750, 751 (Alaska App. 2009); Grandstaff v. State, 171 P.3d 1176, 1210-11 (Alaska App. 2007); Ritter v. State, 97 P.3d 73, 77-78 (Alaska App. 2004); Nicholson v. State, 656 P.2d 1209, 1213 (Alaska App. 1982). 10 Townsend, 2011 WL 4107008 , at *1. –7– 2638 In Townsend, T.M. and his fiancée were walking through a crowded bar, brushing against people.11 Townsend, dressed in drag, approached T.M. and grabbed T.M.’s penis (through T.M.’s clothing) for a few seconds. | 1 | 1 |
Nass v. Seatongreen1 sentence2016In Pattee v. Pattee we adopted the totality of the circumstances test to determine whether child support should be reduced automatically after a voluntary reduction in income.40 We reversed the superior court’s decision setting a reduced rate 39 Richardson, 175 P.3d at 49-50 . 40 744 P.2d 658, 662 (Alaska 1987), overruled on other grounds by Nass v. Seaton, 904 P.2d 412, 416 (Alaska 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Pattee v. Patteegreen1 sentence2016In Pattee v. Pattee we adopted the totality of the circumstances test to determine whether child support should be reduced automatically after a voluntary reduction in income.40 We reversed the superior court’s decision setting a reduced rate 39 Richardson, 175 P.3d at 49-50 . 40 744 P.2d 658, 662 (Alaska 1987), overruled on other grounds by Nass v. Seaton, 904 P.2d 412, 416 (Alaska 1995). | 1 | 1 |
In Re SMgreen2 sentences2015In re SM., 938 S.W.2d at 918; see also Chick, 596 S.E.2d at 308 ("[The totality of the circumstances test] provides greater flexibility to the court making the determination by allowing for consideration of additional circumstances that may be presented in the multiplicity of factual settings in which child custody jurisdictional issues may arise."). * 23 . 2015In re SM., 938 S.W.2d at 918; see also Chick, 596 S.E.2d at 308 ("[The totality of the circumstances test] provides greater flexibility to the court making the determination by allowing for consideration of additional circumstances that may be presented in the multiplicity of factual settings in which child custody jurisdictional issues may arise."). * 23 . | 1 | 1 |
Chick v. Chickgreen2 sentences2015In re SM., 938 S.W.2d at 918; see also Chick, 596 S.E.2d at 308 ("[The totality of the circumstances test] provides greater flexibility to the court making the determination by allowing for consideration of additional circumstances that may be presented in the multiplicity of factual settings in which child custody jurisdictional issues may arise."). * 23 . 2015In re SM., 938 S.W.2d at 918; see also Chick, 596 S.E.2d at 308 ("[The totality of the circumstances test] provides greater flexibility to the court making the determination by allowing for consideration of additional circumstances that may be presented in the multiplicity of factual settings in which child custody jurisdictional issues may arise."). * 23 . | 1 | 1 |
Jerrel v. Alaskagreen2 sentences1996See Jerrel v. State, 851 P.2d 1365, 1370 (Alaska App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994). 8 Sever bases his argument primarily on a numerical analysis of the questioned jurors. 1996See Jerrel v. State, 851 P.2d 1365, 1370 (Alaska App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994). 8 Sever bases his argument primarily on a numerical analysis of the questioned jurors. | 1 | 1 |
Shandon Inc. v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.green1 sentence1996See Jerrel v. State, 851 P.2d 1365, 1370 (Alaska App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994). 8 Sever bases his argument primarily on a numerical analysis of the questioned jurors. | 1 | 1 |
Jerrel v. Stategreen1 sentence1996See Jerrel v. State, 851 P.2d 1365, 1370 (Alaska App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994). 8 Sever bases his argument primarily on a numerical analysis of the questioned jurors. | 1 | 1 |
Tookak v. Stategreen1 sentence1989See Tookak v. State, 648 P.2d 1018, 1021-22 (Alaska App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Quick v. Stategreen2 sentences1987We reasoned that “[t]he mere fact that a person is under the age of majority does not automatically render him incapable of making a knowing and voluntary waiver.” Id. 1987In Quick v. State, 599 P.2d 712, 719 (Alaska 1979), we expressly rejected a per se rule that juveniles are incapable of waiving their Miranda rights without the guidance of an adult, adopting instead a totality of the circumstances rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richardson v. Kohlin
green
1 sentence2016In Pattee v. Pattee we adopted the totality of the circumstances test to determine whether child support should be reduced automatically after a voluntary reduction in income.40 We reversed the superior court’s decision setting a reduced rate 39 Richardson, 175 P.3d at 49-50 . 40 744 P.2d 658, 662 (Alaska 1987), overruled on other grounds by Nass v. Seaton, 904 P.2d 412, 416 (Alaska 1995). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.