Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Paul v. Skempgreen2 sentences2003There is no ambiguity in the wording of the medical malpractice limitations statute that would permit any other reading. 7 Indeed, the court in Paul urged the legislature to provide guidance regarding how to resolve the "possible conflict between actions that arise under the injury rule of accrual and the discovery rule of accrual." Paul, 242 Wis. 2d 507, ¶ 49 . 8 In Paul , the decedent's estate filed its suit within three years of the date that an actionable injury occurred and, therefore, it was timely pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.55 (l)(a). 2003Paul, 242 Wis. 2d 507, ¶ 45 . | 1 | 2 |
Notz v. Everett Smith Group, Ltd.green2 sentences2009See 316 Wis. 2d 640 . 2009See ___ Wis.2d ___, 764 N.W.2d 904 . | 1 | 1 |
cluster 726627green2 sentences2008In support of his argument that the "aggrieved" language of paragraph 27 is sufficient to satisfy the injury requirement of his PCG policy, Liebovich cites United States v. Security Management Co., 96 F.3d 260 (7th Cir. 1996). 2008In that case, the court found coverage where the complaints alleged being "aggrieved." Id. at 262, 268 . | 1 | 1 |
Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. State Department of Natural Resourcesgreen2 sentences1990See Waste Management, 144 Wis. 2d at 505 , 424 N.W.2d at 687 . 1990See Waste Management, 144 Wis. 2d at 505 , 424 N.W.2d at 687 . | 1 | 1 |
Mannino v. Davenportgreen2 sentences1989Mannino v. Davenport, 99 Wis. 2d 602, 608 , 299 N.W.2d 823, 826 (1981), supports our conclusion. 1989Mannino v. Davenport, 99 Wis. 2d 602, 608 , 299 N.W.2d 823, 826 (1981), supports our conclusion. | 1 | 1 |
Resseguie v. American Mutual Liability Insurancegreen2 sentences1976Co., 51 Wis.2d 92, 97, 98 , 186 N.W.2d 236 (1971), this court found it significant that under the policy there to be interpreted notice was required in the event of “accident, occurrence, or loss.” Under such a clause, the court observed that the insured’s duty to give notice “was not limited to instances where he knew that there might be an injury and a claim for damages.” In Sheafor v. Standard Accident Ins. 1976Co., 51 Wis.2d 92, 97, 98 , 186 N.W.2d 236 (1971), this court found it significant that under the policy there to be interpreted notice was required in the event of “accident, occurrence, or loss.” Under such a clause, the court observed that the insured’s duty to give notice “was not limited to instances where he knew that there might be an injury and a claim for damages.” In Sheafor v. Standard Accident Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences2011Perhaps recognizing her inability to articulate a plausible injury, Alsteen cites Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 183 Wis. 2d 627 , 517 N.W.2d 432 (1994), for the proposition that Wisconsin no longer requires actual injury to state a claim for damages. 2011Perhaps recognizing her inability to articulate a plausible injury, Alsteen cites Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 183 Wis. 2d 627 , 517 N.W.2d 432 (1994), for the proposition that Wisconsin no longer requires actual injury to state a claim for damages. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Ultimately, I agree with the court of appeals' determination that "we have been presented with no argument that causes us to conclude that the Johnsons' interest in financial compensation for the injury they claim to have suffered should trump Charlotte's right to maintain the confidentiality of her privileged communications and health care records." Johnson I, 238 Wis. 2d 227, ¶ 18 . 2005Ultimately, I agree with the court of appeals' determination that "we have been presented with no argument that causes us to conclude that the Johnsons' interest in financial compensation for the injury they claim to have suffered should trump Charlotte's right to maintain the confidentiality of her privileged communications and health care records." Johnson I, 238 Wis. 2d 227, ¶ 18 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Railroad Co. v. Barron
green
1 sentence1995Hence, the pecuniary value of the injury in a claim for lost inheritance is not diminished by the value of the estate the plaintiff inherits. 15 On this point, Am Jur Proof of Facts 2d explains: "The decedent's capital investments would pass to his heirs on his death, and thus as to the amount of such investments there would be no loss to the heirs as a result of the decedent's untimely death." Id. § 6 at 236 (1980). 16 Many of these same factors are used to calculate earning capacity in a personal injury action. 3 Minzer et al., DAMAGES IN Tort Actions § 23.11 at 23-6 (1994). 17 The differenc | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Renner v. Madison General Hospital
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 891 , 447 N.W.2d at 99 . 2 *901 Moreover, the plain language of § 893.82, Stats., supports a conclusion that the legislature did not intend that the discovery rule apply to toll the time in which a notice had to be served upon the attorney general under § 893.82(3). 1995Id. at 891 , 447 N.W.2d at 99 . 2 *901 Moreover, the plain language of § 893.82, Stats., supports a conclusion that the legislature did not intend that the discovery rule apply to toll the time in which a notice had to be served upon the attorney general under § 893.82(3). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
green
1 sentence1983The actual injury requirement was recently explained by the United States Supreme Court in Los Angeles v. Lyons, - U.S. -, 51 U.S.L.W. 4424 (1983). 10 In Lyons , the Court wrote that “Abstract injury is not enough. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Sheafor v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.
neutral
2 sentences1976Co., 166 Wis. 498 , 166 N.W. 4 (1918), an accident policy required notice of “injury” within twenty days after “the accident causing such injury,” unless shown not to have been reasonably possible. 1976Co., 166 Wis. 498 , 166 N.W. 4 (1918), an accident policy required notice of “injury” within twenty days after “the accident causing such injury,” unless shown not to have been reasonably possible. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Van Pool v. Industrial Commission
neutral
2 sentences1960Van Pool v. Industrial Comm. 267 Wis. 292 , 64 N. W. (2d) 813 . 1960Van Pool v. Industrial Comm. 267 Wis. 292 , 64 N. W. (2d) 813 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.