12 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People in Interest of SRgreen2 sentences1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct. 1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct.App.1991); In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990); Matter of Morgan, 140 Mich.App. 594 , 364 N.W.2d 754, 758 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
In Re the Welfare of M.S.S.green2 sentences1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct. 1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct.App.1991); In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990); Matter of Morgan, 140 Mich.App. 594 , 364 N.W.2d 754, 758 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
New Jersey v. T. L. O.green2 sentences2014In New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 340 (1985), the United States Supreme Court concluded that the school setting 3 “requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit activity needed to justify a search.” The Court said that for searches by school officials, “a careful balancing of governmental and private interests suggests that the public interest is best served by a Fourth Amendment standard of reasonableness that stops short of probable cause.” Id. at 340-41 . 2014In New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 340 (1985), the United States Supreme Court concluded that the school setting 3 “requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit activity needed to justify a search.” The Court said that for searches by school officials, “a careful balancing of governmental and private interests suggests that the public interest is best served by a Fourth Amendment standard of reasonableness that stops short of probable cause.” Id. at 340-41 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCarthygreen2 sentences2004State v. McCarthy, 133 Idaho 119, 124 , 982 P.2d 954, 959 (Ct.App.1999). 2004State v. McCarthy, 133 Idaho 119, 124 , 982 P.2d 954, 959 (Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Morgangreen2 sentences1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct.App.1991); In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990); Matter of Morgan, 140 Mich.App. 594 , 364 N.W.2d 754, 758 (1985). 1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct.App.1991); In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990); Matter of Morgan, 140 Mich.App. 594 , 364 N.W.2d 754, 758 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Sanchez v. Galeygreen2 sentences1995If a lesser standard were applied, “successive new trials would be mandated until a jury returned the judge’s preordained verdict whenever a judge’s weighing of the evidence yielded a verdict different than that of the jury.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 615 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1240 (1986). 1995If a lesser standard were applied, “successive new trials would be mandated until a jury returned the judge’s preordained verdict whenever a judge’s weighing of the evidence yielded a verdict different than that of the jury.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 615 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1240 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
In Re LNWgreen1 sentence1995Compare People in Interest of S.R., 323 N.W.2d 885, 887 (S.D.1982) (applying “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard under subsection (d)); see also In the Matter of the Welfare of M.S.S., 465 N.W.2d 412 (Minn.Ct.App.1991); In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990); Matter of Morgan, 140 Mich.App. 594 , 364 N.W.2d 754, 758 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. Grasmickgreen2 sentences1991Ebert v. Newton, 97 Idaho 418 , 546 P.2d 64 (1976); Big Butte Ranch Inc. v. Grasmick, 91 Idaho 6 , 415 P.2d 48 (1966) (“ ‘Preponderance of evidence’ means such evidence as, when weighed with that opposed to it, has more convincing force and from which it results that the greater probability of truth lies therein.”). 1991Ebert v. Newton, 97 Idaho 418 , 546 P.2d 64 (1976); Big Butte Ranch Inc. v. Grasmick, 91 Idaho 6 , 415 P.2d 48 (1966) (“ ‘Preponderance of evidence’ means such evidence as, when weighed with that opposed to it, has more convincing force and from which it results that the greater probability of truth lies therein.”). | 1 | 1 |
Robert S. Brodie v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1980First, if a motion for new trial is filed within Fed.R.Crim.P. 33’s seven days, then the lesser standard is applied whether it is based on the “newly discovered evidence” or “any other ground.” Wright, supra at 516, cites Brodie v. United States, 295 F.2d 157, 159, 160 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ferreira
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 436 , 958 P.2d at 593 . 1 Our decision in State v. Ferreira, 133 Idaho 474 , 988 P.2d 700 (Ct.App.1999), suggests that the lesser standard of reasonable suspicion might suffice, for we there held that officers may administer roadside field sobriety tests on the basis of reasonable suspicion. 2003Id. at 436 , 958 P.2d at 593 . 1 Our decision in State v. Ferreira, 133 Idaho 474 , 988 P.2d 700 (Ct.App.1999), suggests that the lesser standard of reasonable suspicion might suffice, for we there held that officers may administer roadside field sobriety tests on the basis of reasonable suspicion. | 2 | 2003–2008 |
Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Sammis, 130 Idaho at 347 , 941 P.2d at 319 . 2013Sammis, 130 Idaho at 347 , 941 P.2d at 319 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Deen v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 436 , 958 P.2d at 593 . 1 Our decision in State v. Ferreira, 133 Idaho 474 , 988 P.2d 700 (Ct.App.1999), suggests that the lesser standard of reasonable suspicion might suffice, for we there held that officers may administer roadside field sobriety tests on the basis of reasonable suspicion. 2003Id. at 436 , 958 P.2d at 593 . 1 Our decision in State v. Ferreira, 133 Idaho 474 , 988 P.2d 700 (Ct.App.1999), suggests that the lesser standard of reasonable suspicion might suffice, for we there held that officers may administer roadside field sobriety tests on the basis of reasonable suspicion. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Ebert v. Newton
green
2 sentences1991Ebert v. Newton, 97 Idaho 418 , 546 P.2d 64 (1976); Big Butte Ranch Inc. v. Grasmick, 91 Idaho 6 , 415 P.2d 48 (1966) (“ ‘Preponderance of evidence’ means such evidence as, when weighed with that opposed to it, has more convincing force and from which it results that the greater probability of truth lies therein.”). 1991Ebert v. Newton, 97 Idaho 418 , 546 P.2d 64 (1976); Big Butte Ranch Inc. v. Grasmick, 91 Idaho 6 , 415 P.2d 48 (1966) (“ ‘Preponderance of evidence’ means such evidence as, when weighed with that opposed to it, has more convincing force and from which it results that the greater probability of truth lies therein.”). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States
green
1 sentence1987Kadwell v. United States, 315 F.2d 667 (9th Cir.1963). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
2 sentences1986Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). 1986Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.