11 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Irish Subcommittee of the Rhode Island Heritage Commission v. Rhode Island Heritage Commissiongreen2 sentences2006Id. 2001See id. | 1 | 2 |
Addington v. Texasgreen2 sentences2010Id. at 366-68 , 103 S.Ct. 3043 (recognizing that the fundamental differences between insanity acquittees and persons facing civil commitments negate the necessity for adopting the same standard of proof); see also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 431-33 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979) (adopting clear and convincing evidence as proper burden of proof for civil commitments). 2010Id. at 366-68 , 103 S.Ct. 3043 (recognizing that the fundamental differences between insanity acquittees and persons facing civil commitments negate the necessity for adopting the same standard of proof); see also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 431-33 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979) (adopting clear and convincing evidence as proper burden of proof for civil commitments). | 1 | 1 |
Cornfeldt v. Tongengreen1 sentence2009Cf. Cornfeldt v. Tongen, 262 N.W.2d 684, 694-95 (Minn.1977) (holding trial court properly excluded expert’s testimony that the accepted medical practice required a resident to review preoperative test results because the expert lacked knowledge of the requirements of the resident in his first stage of residency). | 1 | 1 |
Scully Signal Co. v. Joyalgreen1 sentence2007See Scully Signal Co. , 881 F. Supp. at 736 (finding the personal jurisdiction and veil-piercing inquiries to be the same when considering motions to dismiss under rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6)); see also 1 Fletcher, Corporations § 43.70 at 326-27 (noting that there may be a lesser standard for veil-piercing merely for purposes of jurisdiction, and that a showing of control by the non-resident corporation over the resident corporation will suffice for jurisdictional purposes). 37 The Court clearly has jurisdiction over Cookson America and FIP because their principle places of business are in Rho | 1 | 1 |
Grayned v. City of Rockfordgreen1 sentence2001See id. | 1 | 1 |
Rosenblatt v. Baergreen2 sentences1990It was the trial justice’s duty initially to decide whether plaintiffs were public figures, see Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88 , 86 S.Ct. 669, 677 , 15 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 (1966), and Major v. Drapeau, 507 A.2d 938, 941 (R.I.1986), and he *473 found “that the plaintiffs are ‘public figures’ for the limited purpose of [the] commentary concerning the waste hauling and disposal business.” We have made an independent examination of the record in accordance with New York Times Co., 376 U.S. at 285 , 84 S.Ct. at 728-29 , 11 L.Ed.2d at 709 , and having reviewed the decisions of the Supreme Court of 1990It was the trial justice’s duty initially to decide whether plaintiffs were public figures, see Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88 , 86 S.Ct. 669, 677 , 15 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 (1966), and Major v. Drapeau, 507 A.2d 938, 941 (R.I.1986), and he *473 found “that the plaintiffs are ‘public figures’ for the limited purpose of [the] commentary concerning the waste hauling and disposal business.” We have made an independent examination of the record in accordance with New York Times Co., 376 U.S. at 285 , 84 S.Ct. at 728-29 , 11 L.Ed.2d at 709 , and having reviewed the decisions of the Supreme Court of | 1 | 1 |
McGee v. International Life Insurancegreen2 sentences1985A single contract formed the basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction in McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. at 223 , 78 S.Ct. at 201, 2 L.Ed.2d at 226. 1985A single contract formed the basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction in McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. at 223 , 78 S.Ct. at 201, 2 L.Ed.2d at 226. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.green1 sentence1983See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir.1979) (communications pertaining to receiving, concealing, selling, or disposing of goods of the value of $5,000 or more knowing the same to be stolen); United States v. Cohen, 530 F.2d 43, 45 (5th Cir.1976) (conversations related to trafficking in narcotics); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 154 (9th Cir.1975) (communications involving the date, time, place, manner in which *6 illegal narcotic drugs will be delivered); United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1131 (2nd Cir.1975) (communications which reveal scheme to dis | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Mainellogreen1 sentence1983See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir.1979) (communications pertaining to receiving, concealing, selling, or disposing of goods of the value of $5,000 or more knowing the same to be stolen); United States v. Cohen, 530 F.2d 43, 45 (5th Cir.1976) (conversations related to trafficking in narcotics); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 154 (9th Cir.1975) (communications involving the date, time, place, manner in which *6 illegal narcotic drugs will be delivered); United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1131 (2nd Cir.1975) (communications which reveal scheme to dis | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Stuart Steinberggreen1 sentence1983See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir.1979) (communications pertaining to receiving, concealing, selling, or disposing of goods of the value of $5,000 or more knowing the same to be stolen); United States v. Cohen, 530 F.2d 43, 45 (5th Cir.1976) (conversations related to trafficking in narcotics); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 154 (9th Cir.1975) (communications involving the date, time, place, manner in which *6 illegal narcotic drugs will be delivered); United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1131 (2nd Cir.1975) (communications which reveal scheme to dis | 1 | 1 |
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuitgreen1 sentence1983See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir.1979) (communications pertaining to receiving, concealing, selling, or disposing of goods of the value of $5,000 or more knowing the same to be stolen); United States v. Cohen, 530 F.2d 43, 45 (5th Cir.1976) (conversations related to trafficking in narcotics); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 154 (9th Cir.1975) (communications involving the date, time, place, manner in which *6 illegal narcotic drugs will be delivered); United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1131 (2nd Cir.1975) (communications which reveal scheme to dis | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Kenneth Cohengreen1 sentence1983See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir.1979) (communications pertaining to receiving, concealing, selling, or disposing of goods of the value of $5,000 or more knowing the same to be stolen); United States v. Cohen, 530 F.2d 43, 45 (5th Cir.1976) (conversations related to trafficking in narcotics); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 154 (9th Cir.1975) (communications involving the date, time, place, manner in which *6 illegal narcotic drugs will be delivered); United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1131 (2nd Cir.1975) (communications which reveal scheme to dis | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lischio v. Zoning Board of Review of North Kingstown
green
1 sentence2011Our Supreme Court then clarified that "the revised language in the 2002 amendment lessens the burden of proof necessary to obtain dimensional relief and an applicant need show only that the effect of denying dimensional relief amounts to more than a mere inconvenience." Lischio , 818 A.2d at 692 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jones v. United States
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 366-68 , 103 S.Ct. 3043 (recognizing that the fundamental differences between insanity acquittees and persons facing civil commitments negate the necessity for adopting the same standard of proof); see also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 431-33 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979) (adopting clear and convincing evidence as proper burden of proof for civil commitments). 2010Id. at 366-68 , 103 S.Ct. 3043 (recognizing that the fundamental differences between insanity acquittees and persons facing civil commitments negate the necessity for adopting the same standard of proof); see also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 431-33 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979) (adopting clear and convincing evidence as proper burden of proof for civil commitments). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Baccari v. Donat
green
1 sentence2009Although in Baccari, 741 A.2d at 264 , this Court said that residents are held to the same general standard of care as physicians and are not held to a lesser standard, that holding did not define or address an intern’s or resident’s duties under the circumstances present in a particular case. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Larocque v. Rhode Island Joint Reinsurance Ass'n
green
1 sentence1997Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
City of Warwick v. Aptt
green
1 sentence1996Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1990It was the trial justice’s duty initially to decide whether plaintiffs were public figures, see Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88 , 86 S.Ct. 669, 677 , 15 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 (1966), and Major v. Drapeau, 507 A.2d 938, 941 (R.I.1986), and he *473 found “that the plaintiffs are ‘public figures’ for the limited purpose of [the] commentary concerning the waste hauling and disposal business.” We have made an independent examination of the record in accordance with New York Times Co., 376 U.S. at 285 , 84 S.Ct. at 728-29 , 11 L.Ed.2d at 709 , and having reviewed the decisions of the Supreme Court of 1990It was the trial justice’s duty initially to decide whether plaintiffs were public figures, see Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88 , 86 S.Ct. 669, 677 , 15 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 (1966), and Major v. Drapeau, 507 A.2d 938, 941 (R.I.1986), and he *473 found “that the plaintiffs are ‘public figures’ for the limited purpose of [the] commentary concerning the waste hauling and disposal business.” We have made an independent examination of the record in accordance with New York Times Co., 376 U.S. at 285 , 84 S.Ct. at 728-29 , 11 L.Ed.2d at 709 , and having reviewed the decisions of the Supreme Court of | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Major v. Drapeau
green
1 sentence1990It was the trial justice’s duty initially to decide whether plaintiffs were public figures, see Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88 , 86 S.Ct. 669, 677 , 15 L.Ed.2d 597, 606 (1966), and Major v. Drapeau, 507 A.2d 938, 941 (R.I.1986), and he *473 found “that the plaintiffs are ‘public figures’ for the limited purpose of [the] commentary concerning the waste hauling and disposal business.” We have made an independent examination of the record in accordance with New York Times Co., 376 U.S. at 285 , 84 S.Ct. at 728-29 , 11 L.Ed.2d at 709 , and having reviewed the decisions of the Supreme Court of | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.