11 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barber v. Bradleygreen1 sentence2022Barber v. Bradley, 505 S.W.3d 749, 755 (Ky. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Mullins v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2016Mullins v. Commonwealth, 956 S.W.2d 210, 211 (Ky. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2006For example, we have noted that “[t]he party invoking the marital privilege has the burden of proving its applicability .... ” Sanders v. Commonwealth, 89 S.W.3d 380, 391 (Ky.2002). 2006For example, we have noted that "[t]he party invoking the marital privilege has the burden of proving its applicability. . . ." Sanders v. Commonwealth, 89 S.W.3d 380, 391 (Ky.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Grant v. Grantgreen1 sentence2003See, e.g., Grant v. Grant, 424 A.2d 139 (Me.l981)(discussing two of the options). | 1 | 1 |
Magic Coal Co. v. Foxgreen2 sentences2001Commentary to KRE 301, Evidence Rules Study Committee, Final Draft (1989); cf. Magic Coal Co. v. Fox, Ky., 19 S.W.3d 88, 95-96 (2000). 2001Commentary to KRE 301, Evidence Rules Study Committee, Final Draft (1989); cf. Magic Coal Co. v. Fox, Ky., 19 S.W.3d 88, 95-96 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jwp v. Ww
green
2 sentences2005In J.W.P. v. W.W, 255 N.J.Super. 185 , 604 A.2d.695 (1990), a biological father asserted the marital presumption and the doctrine of equitable estoppel in an attempt to avoid his obligation to support a child he had fathered in an extramarital affair. 2005In J.W.P. v. W.W, 255 N.J.Super. 185 , 604 A.2d.695 (1990), a biological father asserted the marital presumption and the doctrine of equitable estoppel in an attempt to avoid his obligation to support a child he had fathered in an extramarital affair. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2005Id. at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 1357 . 2005Id. at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 1357 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Estes v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1997Estes, supra, is a review of the marital privilege exception in general under the former statute. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Wells v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1993In Wells , as in Richmond , the Court narrowly applied the marital privilege, characterizing it as “one of the most ill-founded precepts to be found in the common law....” Wells, 562 S.W.2d at 624 . 1993The Court cautioned that “[w]hen it is encountered it is better to be trimmed than enlarged.” Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Gill v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1988Further, as to confidentiality, in Gill v. Commonwealth, Ky., 374 S.W.2d 848 (1964), we held that any action, occurrence, or verbal exchange between spouses that *429 could have been seen or heard by a third person is not protected by the marital privilege. 1988Further, as to confidentiality, in Gill v. Commonwealth, Ky., 374 S.W.2d 848 (1964), we held that any action, occurrence, or verbal exchange between spouses that could have been seen or heard by a third person is not protected by the marital privilege. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.