Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stevenson v. Stevensongreen1 sentence1992The rationale for including pension benefits as marital property subject to equitable division has been stated in Stevenson v. Stevenson, 511 A.2d 961, 965 (R.I. 1986): “ 'To the extent earned during the marriage, the benefits represent compensation for marital effort and are substitutes for current earnings which would have increased the marital standard of living or would have been converted into other assets divisible at dissolution. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Glovergreen2 sentences1981See also K.S.A. 60-428(b)(3) and State v. Glover, 219 Kan. 54 , 547 P.2d 351 (1976). 1981See also K.S.A. 60-428(b)(3) and State v. Glover, 219 Kan. 54 , 547 P.2d 351 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1977See State v. Thompson and Pennington, 221 Kan. 165 , 558 P.2d 1079 . 1977See State v. Thompson and Pennington, 221 Kan. 165 , 558 P.2d 1079 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2017The Court concluded that "[s]tatements taken by police officers in the course of interrogations are also testimonial under even a narrow standard." 541 U.S. at 52 . 2007In Crawford , the State sought to introduce the tape-recorded statements from a police interrogation of the defendant’s wife, who did not testify at trial because of the marital privilege. 541 U.S. at 38-40 . | 3 | 2006–2017 |
State v. Newman
green
2 sentences2000In Newman, 235 Kan. 29 , our court considered whether a wife’s observation of the physical actions of her husband constituted confidential communications subject to the marital privilege. 1984Marital privilege is thoroughly discussed in State v. Newman, 235 Kan. 29 , 680 P.2d 257 (1984). | 2 | 1984–2000 |
Greer ex rel. Farbo v. Greer
green
1 sentence2023He also argues the district court had an unconscious bias against him that led it to improperly weigh the best interests of the child factors set forth in Greer v. Greer, 50 Kan. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Bishop v. State
green
1 sentence1984A recent case holding to the same effect is Bishop v. State, 582 S.W.2d 86 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Osborne
green
2 sentences1984In a later case, State v. Osborne, 18 Wash. App. 318 , 569 P.2d 1176 (1977), the Washington court held that the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply to bar the admission of evidence derived from facts obtained from the wife that would not have been admissible at the trial under the marital privilege. 1984In a later case, State v. Osborne, 18 Wash. App. 318 , 569 P.2d 1176 (1977), the Washington court held that the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply to bar the admission of evidence derived from facts obtained from the wife that would not have been admissible at the trial under the marital privilege. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Daniels
green
2 sentences1981In State v. Daniels, 215 Kan. 164 , 523 P.2d 368 (1974), defendant was convicted of blackmail. 1981In State v. Daniels, 215 Kan. 164 , 523 P.2d 368 (1974), defendant was convicted of blackmail. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.