property violation (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

property violation in Arkansas

10 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Chapman v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1961 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S.Ct. 776 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961) (holding that a landlord could not validly consent to the search of a house he had rented to another).

2006See Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S.Ct. 776 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961) (holding that a landlord could not validly consent to the search of a house he had rented to another).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Thomas v. Westbrook green
ark · 1944
2 sentences

1979Conversion is the “exercise of dominion over the property in violation of the rights of the owner or person entitled to possession.” Thomas v. Westbrook, 206 Ark. 841 , 177 S.W. 2d 931 (1944).

1979Conversion is the “exercise of dominion over the property in violation of the rights of the owner or person entitled to possession.” Thomas v. Westbrook, 206 Ark. 841 , 177 S.W. 2d 931 (1944).

21953–1979
Burdyshaw v. State green
arkctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2002Id.

2002Id.

12002–2002
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Herring green
ark · 1979
2 sentences

1993Herring, 267 Ark. 701 , 589 S.W.2d 584 .

1993Herring, 267 Ark. 201 , 589 S.W.2d 584 .

11993–1993
Noble Gill Pontiac, Inc. v. Bassett neutral
ark · 1957
2 sentences

1958Noble Gill Pontiac Co. v. Bassett, 227 Ark. 211 , 297 S. W. 2d 658 .

1958Noble Gill Pontiac Co. v. Bassett, 227 Ark. 211 , 297 S. W. 2d 658 .

11958–1958
Barnett Bros. Mercantile Co. v. Jarrett neutral
ark · 1918
2 sentences

1953Mercantile Co. v. Jarrett, 133 Ark. 173 , 202 S. W. 474 , Chief Justice McCullough approved the following definition of conversion: ‘ ‘ ‘ The wrongful assumption or dominion over property of another in subversion and denial of his rights, constitutes a conversion of such property, irrespective of whether there was a demand made for the surrender and refusal to surrender said property.’ ” In Thomas v. Westbrook, 206 Ark. 843 , 177 S. W. 2d 931 , it was recognized that conversion could be constructively accomplished; and Mr. Justice Robins said: “Conversion is ordinarily said to consist of the e

1953Mercantile Co. v. Jarrett, 133 Ark. 173 , 202 S. W. 474 , Chief Justice McCullough approved the following definition of conversion: ‘ ‘ ‘ The wrongful assumption or dominion over property of another in subversion and denial of his rights, constitutes a conversion of such property, irrespective of whether there was a demand made for the surrender and refusal to surrender said property.’ ” In Thomas v. Westbrook, 206 Ark. 843 , 177 S. W. 2d 931 , it was recognized that conversion could be constructively accomplished; and Mr. Justice Robins said: “Conversion is ordinarily said to consist of the e

11953–1953
Pettit v. Stuttgart Normal Institute neutral
ark · 1900
2 sentences

1941Appellant cites and relies on Pettit v. Stuttgart Normal Institute, 67 Ark. 430 , 55 S. W. 485 ; St.

1941Appellant cites and relies on Pettit v. Stuttgart Normal Institute, 67 Ark. 430 , 55 S. W. 485 ; St.

11941–1941
Patton v. Randolph neutral
ark · 1939
2 sentences

1939In the first two mentioned cases the principle is announced that it would be a fraud in a purchaser, who obtained property at a price greatly below its value by means of a verbal agreement, to keep the property in violation of the agreement.” This ease is distinguishable from the recent case of Patton v. Randolph, 197 Ark. 653 , 124 S. W. 2d 823 , although the distinction is rather narrow.

1939In the first two mentioned cases the principle is announced that it would be a fraud in a purchaser, who obtained property at a price greatly below its value by means of a verbal agreement, to keep the property in violation of the agreement.” This ease is distinguishable from the recent case of Patton v. Randolph, 197 Ark. 653 , 124 S. W. 2d 823 , although the distinction is rather narrow.

11939–1939
Taylor v. Godbold green
ark · 1905
2 sentences

1931Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 , 88 S. W. 959 ; Reich v. Workman, 110 Ark. 140 , 161 S. W. 180 ; Worthen v. Stewart, 116 Ark. 294 , 172 S. W. 185 ; Lasher-Morris B. & T.

1931Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 , 88 S. W. 959 ; Reich v. Workman, 110 Ark. 140 , 161 S. W. 180 ; Worthen v. Stewart, 116 Ark. 294 , 172 S. W. 185 ; Lasher-Morris B. & T.

11931–1931
Reich v. Workman neutral
ark · 1913
2 sentences

1931Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 , 88 S. W. 959 ; Reich v. Workman, 110 Ark. 140 , 161 S. W. 180 ; Worthen v. Stewart, 116 Ark. 294 , 172 S. W. 185 ; Lasher-Morris B. & T.

1931Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 , 88 S. W. 959 ; Reich v. Workman, 110 Ark. 140 , 161 S. W. 180 ; Worthen v. Stewart, 116 Ark. 294 , 172 S. W. 185 ; Lasher-Morris B. & T.

11931–1931
Worthen v. Stewart neutral
ark · 1915
1 sentence

1931Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 , 88 S. W. 959 ; Reich v. Workman, 110 Ark. 140 , 161 S. W. 180 ; Worthen v. Stewart, 116 Ark. 294 , 172 S. W. 185 ; Lasher-Morris B. & T.

11931–1931
Beasley v. State neutral
ind · 1894
1 sentence

1904In Beasley v. State, 138 Ind. 552 , the supreme court of that state held that “under the enabling statutes of this state the husband’s interest in his wife’s property is abolished, and he may be convicted of the larceny of her money.” In its essential features that case was very much like the one at bar, and practically all the arguments made by counsel in this case were made in that.

11904–1904

Where else courts name it

PA 228 (1896–2026) CA 125 (1881–2026) TX 124 (1902–2026) NY 79 (1826–2026) WA 58 (1918–2026) IL 38 (1899–2024) AL 25 (1849–2026) TN 24 (1939–2024) CT 24 (1920–2022) NJ 24 (1934–2019) OH 21 (1922–2026) GA 20 (1899–2026) IN 19 (1894–2024) FL 19 (1921–2026) ME 19 (1974–2023) LA 18 (1943–2016) MA 18 (1919–2026) MO 18 (1867–2020) OR 18 (1920–2020) OK 17 (1912–1999) IA 16 (1905–2021) MI 15 (1952–2022) CO 15 (1895–2024) AZ 14 (1923–2024) MD 13 (1907–2016) NC 13 (1901–2016) MS 11 (1903–2017) VA 10 (1960–2018) WI 10 (1899–2008) AR 10 (1904–2006) UT 10 (1900–2024) NE 9 (1878–2022) SD 9 (1954–2025) NM 9 (1946–2019) MT 9 (1901–2018) KY 8 (1912–2026) NH 7 (1878–2022) KS 7 (1927–2014) ID 6 (1913–1984) SC 6 (1911–2023) AK 6 (1987–2022) ND 6 (1913–2018) VT 5 (2003–2023) WV 5 (1888–2004) RI 5 (1998–2026) MN 4 (1885–2004) WY 4 (1981–2004) DE 4 (1970–2024) DC 3 (1960–2001) HI 3 (1998–2021) PR 2 (1911–1953) NV 2 (2014–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check