property hearing (North Dakota) · Go Syfert
← North Dakota issues

property hearing in North Dakota

6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1913–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
The Formula Inc. v. Superior Courtgreen
calctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017The California Court of Appeals said Formula’s jurisdictional argument presupposed the lis pen-dens was authorized by statutory language stating a “party to an action who asserts a real property claim may record a notice of pendency of action in which that real property claim is alleged.” Id. at 345.

11
Holkesvig v. Grovegreen
nd · 2014 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Holkesvig v. Grove, 2014 ND 57, ¶ 11 , 844 N.W.2d 557 .

2017See Holkesvig v. Grove, 2014 ND 57, ¶ 11 , 844 N.W.2d 557 .

11
Hultberg v. Hultberggreen
nd · 1977 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1978–1978
2 sentences

1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D. 1977): "Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular case is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court." On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D. 1977), we said: "Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respect

1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D.1977): “Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular ease is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.” On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D.1977), we said: “Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respectiv

11
Haberstroh v. Haberstrohgreen
nd · 1977 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1978–1978
2 sentences

1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D. 1977): "Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular case is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court." On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D. 1977), we said: "Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respect

1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D.1977): “Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular ease is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.” On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D.1977), we said: “Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respectiv

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Castaneda v. Olsher green
cal · 2007
1 sentence

2018Id. at 621 . [¶ 21] As in Castaneda , the Bjerks assert Anderson had a duty to stop dangerous criminal activity on his property by removing Nick Thorsen from the property or by warning his guests of the dangers they might face as a result of Nick Thorsen's drug activity.

12018–2018
McCarthy v. Talley green
nd · 1913
1 sentence

1923It is not “connected with the subject matter of the action.” If the finding was that defendants were entitled to the return of the property then under the rule of McCarty v. Kepreta, 24 N. D. 395 , 48 L.R.A.(N.S.) 65, 139 N. W. 992 , Ann.

11923–1923
McCarty v. Kepreta green
nd · 1913
1 sentence

1923It is not “connected with the subject matter of the action.” If the finding was that defendants were entitled to the return of the property then under the rule of McCarty v. Kepreta, 24 N. D. 395 , 48 L.R.A.(N.S.) 65, 139 N. W. 992 , Ann.

11923–1923
Clark v. Sullivan green
nd · 1893
2 sentences

1913All the principles so involved dn arriving at such a conclusion have been, by this court, concluded against appellant by the case of Clark v. Sullivan, 3 N. D. 280 , 55 N. W. 733 .

1913All the principles so involved dn arriving at such a conclusion have been, by this court, concluded against appellant by the case of Clark v. Sullivan, 3 N. D. 280 , 55 N. W. 733 .

11913–1913

Where else courts name it

PA 228 (1896–2026) CA 125 (1881–2026) TX 124 (1902–2026) NY 79 (1826–2026) WA 58 (1918–2026) IL 38 (1899–2024) AL 25 (1849–2026) TN 24 (1939–2024) CT 24 (1920–2022) NJ 24 (1934–2019) OH 21 (1922–2026) GA 20 (1899–2026) IN 19 (1894–2024) FL 19 (1921–2026) ME 19 (1974–2023) LA 18 (1943–2016) MA 18 (1919–2026) MO 18 (1867–2020) OR 18 (1920–2020) OK 17 (1912–1999) IA 16 (1905–2021) MI 15 (1952–2022) CO 15 (1895–2024) AZ 14 (1923–2024) MD 13 (1907–2016) NC 13 (1901–2016) MS 11 (1903–2017) VA 10 (1960–2018) WI 10 (1899–2008) AR 10 (1904–2006) UT 10 (1900–2024) NE 9 (1878–2022) SD 9 (1954–2025) NM 9 (1946–2019) MT 9 (1901–2018) KY 8 (1912–2026) NH 7 (1878–2022) KS 7 (1927–2014) ID 6 (1913–1984) SC 6 (1911–2023) AK 6 (1987–2022) ND 6 (1913–2018) VT 5 (2003–2023) WV 5 (1888–2004) RI 5 (1998–2026) MN 4 (1885–2004) WY 4 (1981–2004) DE 4 (1970–2024) DC 3 (1960–2001) HI 3 (1998–2021) PR 2 (1911–1953) NV 2 (2014–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check