Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1913–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The Formula Inc. v. Superior Courtgreen1 sentence2017The California Court of Appeals said Formula’s jurisdictional argument presupposed the lis pen-dens was authorized by statutory language stating a “party to an action who asserts a real property claim may record a notice of pendency of action in which that real property claim is alleged.” Id. at 345. | 1 | 1 |
Holkesvig v. Grovegreen2 sentences2017See Holkesvig v. Grove, 2014 ND 57, ¶ 11 , 844 N.W.2d 557 . 2017See Holkesvig v. Grove, 2014 ND 57, ¶ 11 , 844 N.W.2d 557 . | 1 | 1 |
Hultberg v. Hultberggreen2 sentences1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D. 1977): "Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular case is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court." On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D. 1977), we said: "Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respect 1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D.1977): “Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular ease is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.” On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D.1977), we said: “Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respectiv | 1 | 1 |
Haberstroh v. Haberstrohgreen2 sentences1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D. 1977): "Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular case is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court." On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D. 1977), we said: "Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respect 1978On the proposition as to the role conduct plays in the distribution of property, we said in Hultberg v. Hultberg, 259 N.W.2d 41, 45 (N.D.1977): “Whether or not the conduct of the spouses in a particular ease is a significant factor in dividing the property between them is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.” On the same subject, in Haberstroh v. Haberstroh, 258 N.W.2d 669, 672 (N.D.1977), we said: “Under § 14-05-24, N.D.C.C., the district court may consider, in determining the division of property or in determining whether either party is entitled to alimony, the respectiv | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Castaneda v. Olsher
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 621 . [¶ 21] As in Castaneda , the Bjerks assert Anderson had a duty to stop dangerous criminal activity on his property by removing Nick Thorsen from the property or by warning his guests of the dangers they might face as a result of Nick Thorsen's drug activity. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
McCarthy v. Talley
green
1 sentence1923It is not “connected with the subject matter of the action.” If the finding was that defendants were entitled to the return of the property then under the rule of McCarty v. Kepreta, 24 N. D. 395 , 48 L.R.A.(N.S.) 65, 139 N. W. 992 , Ann. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
McCarty v. Kepreta
green
1 sentence1923It is not “connected with the subject matter of the action.” If the finding was that defendants were entitled to the return of the property then under the rule of McCarty v. Kepreta, 24 N. D. 395 , 48 L.R.A.(N.S.) 65, 139 N. W. 992 , Ann. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Clark v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1913All the principles so involved dn arriving at such a conclusion have been, by this court, concluded against appellant by the case of Clark v. Sullivan, 3 N. D. 280 , 55 N. W. 733 . 1913All the principles so involved dn arriving at such a conclusion have been, by this court, concluded against appellant by the case of Clark v. Sullivan, 3 N. D. 280 , 55 N. W. 733 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.