Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
J. D. B. v. North Carolinagreen2 sentences2016Jensen also asserts that his status as a juvenile should be factored into the custody analysis, noting the United States Supreme Court has held that “a child’s age is far ‘more than a chronological fact.’ ” J.D.B. v. N. Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 , 272, 131 S.Ct. 2394 , 2403, 180 L.Ed.2d 310 , 323-24 (2011). 2016Jensen also asserts that his status as a juvenile should be factored into the custody analysis, noting the United States Supreme Court has held that “a child’s age is far ‘more than a chronological fact.’ ” J.D.B. v. N. Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 , 272, 131 S.Ct. 2394 , 2403, 180 L.Ed.2d 310 , 323-24 (2011). | 2 | 2 |
Oregon v. Mathiasongreen2 sentences2016Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711, 713-14 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714, 719 (1977). 2016Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711, 713-14 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714, 719 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Doegreen2 sentences2015See also State v. Doe, 130 Idaho 811, 818-19 , 948 P.2d 166, 173-74 (Ct. App. 1997). 6 We next turn to our examination of the totality of the circumstances surrounding Huffaker’s interrogation. 2015See also State v. Doe, 130 Idaho 811, 818-19 , 948 P.2d 166, 173-74 (Ct. App. 1997). 6 We next turn to our examination of the totality of the circumstances surrounding Huffaker’s interrogation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jane Doe v. Jane Doe I
green
2 sentences2022First, Hernandez argued she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because, based on Doe v. Doe, 162 Idaho 254 , 395 P.3d 1287 (2017), Glatte’s petition failed to state a custody claim upon which relief could be granted. 2022First, Hernandez argued she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because, based on Doe v. Doe, 162 Idaho 254 , 395 P.3d 1287 (2017), Glatte’s petition failed to state a custody claim upon which relief could be granted. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Medrano
green
2 sentences2015The district court considered these circumstances as factors based upon similar circumstances found in a previous custody analysis undertaken by this Court in Medrano, 123 Idaho 114 , 844 P.2d 1364 . 2015The district court considered these circumstances as factors based upon similar circumstances found in a previous custody analysis undertaken by this Court in Medrano, 123 Idaho 114 , 844 P.2d 1364 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Hopper v. Hopper
green
1 sentence2008We remanded for a custody hearing “where the father has the opportunity to have the contact with his child to which he is entitled and the child receives the benefit recognized in our law that it is in the best interest of the child to have a continuing relationship with both parents.” 144 Idaho at 627, 167 P.3d at 764 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Application of Altmiller
green
2 sentences1979In re Ewing, supra, (step-father awarded custody over father where step-father had custody of the children for over four years); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667 , 496 P.2d 666 (1972) (nonparents granted custody of child over father where nonparents had custody of child for seven years); Application of Altmiller, 76 Idaho 521 , 285 P.2d 1064 (1955) (grandparents granted custody of child over father where grandparents had custody of child for nearly seven years). 1979In re Ewing, supra, (step-father awarded custody over father where step-father had custody of the children for over four years); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667 , 496 P.2d 666 (1972) (nonparents granted custody of child over father where nonparents had custody of child for seven years); Application of Altmiller, 76 Idaho 521 , 285 P.2d 1064 (1955) (grandparents granted custody of child over father where grandparents had custody of child for nearly seven years). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Yearsley v. Yearsley
green
2 sentences1979In re Ewing, supra, (step-father awarded custody over father where step-father had custody of the children for over four years); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667 , 496 P.2d 666 (1972) (nonparents granted custody of child over father where nonparents had custody of child for seven years); Application of Altmiller, 76 Idaho 521 , 285 P.2d 1064 (1955) (grandparents granted custody of child over father where grandparents had custody of child for nearly seven years). 1979In re Ewing, supra, (step-father awarded custody over father where step-father had custody of the children for over four years); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667 , 496 P.2d 666 (1972) (nonparents granted custody of child over father where nonparents had custody of child for seven years); Application of Altmiller, 76 Idaho 521 , 285 P.2d 1064 (1955) (grandparents granted custody of child over father where grandparents had custody of child for nearly seven years). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Carpenter
green
2 sentences1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). 1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
United States v. Walter P. MacKiewicz and Florence B. MacKiewicz
green
2 sentences1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). 1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Mackiewicz v. United States
green
2 sentences1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). 1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. United States
green
2 sentences1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). 1969United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 923 , 89 S.Ct. 253 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1968); cf. State v. Carpenter, 92 Idaho 12 , 435 P.2d 789 (1967). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.