like instruction in Illinois

1946(People v. Willy, 301 Ill. 307 .)” It is true that a number of instructions were given on the various phases of self-defense but to analyze each and every one of them for strict accuracy would unnecessarily extend the opinion.

1923(People v. Willy, 301 Ill. 307 .) Instruction No. 10 is simply a copy of sections 148 and 149 of the Criminal Code, — another laborsaving makeshift commonly used in homicide trials that does not give the jury any accurate knowledge of the law of self-defense.

1912Co. v. Harrington, 192 Ill. 9 , it is said: “A party has no right to complain of an error in an instruction, when a like error appears in an instruction given at his own request.” C. & A. R.

1909Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. Harrington, 192 Ill. 9 ; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Robizas, 207 id. 226.

1993Ed. 2d 444, 455 , 105 S. Ct. 3346, 3352 .) The court must take into account, however, that questions of arbitrability must be addressed with a healthy regard for the, Federal policy favoring arbitration, and “any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration, whether the problem at hand is the construction of the contract language itself or an allegation of waiver, delay, or a like defense to arbitrability.” Moses H.

1992It by no means follows that, because the legislature deemed it necessary to assure his appearance as a party in appeals involving unemployed claimants, a like requirement was necessary where the refund of contributions is sought, as here.” Murphy, 383 Ill. at 307 .

1992In Cuny v. Annunzio (1952), 411 Ill. 613 , the Board confirmed a decision of the Division of Unemployment Compensation in which it determined, inter alia, that Edward and Bernice Cuny, doing business as the Cuny Addressing Service, were employers within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation Act (Ill.

1975While this approach also appears to be followed in California, People v. Lara (1967), 67 Cal. 2d 365 , 432 P.2d 202 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 945 , the California Supreme Court only touched on the issue of certification in its Lara opinion.

1975While this approach also appears to be followed in California, People v. Lara (1967), 67 Cal. 2d 365 , 432 P.2d 202 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 945 , the California Supreme Court only touched on the issue of certification in its Lara opinion.

1975While this approach also appears to be followed in California, People v. Lara (1967), 67 Cal. 2d 365 , 432 P.2d 202 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 945 , the California Supreme Court only touched on the issue of certification in its Lara opinion.

1966It is here urged that there is no allegation that Leslie Hubert Boots is a living person, that such an allegation and proof was required under the old law (see People v. Gould, 347 Ill 298, 179 NE 848 , and People v. Meeks, 55 Ill App2d 437, 205 NE2d 62 ) to sustain a conviction for forgery and, since the drafters of our new Criminal Code stated they were only codifying the existing law, a like requirement now obtains.

1966It is here urged that there is no allegation that Leslie Hubert Boots is a living person, that such an allegation and proof was required under the old law (see People v. Gould, 347 Ill 298, 179 NE 848 , and People v. Meeks, 55 Ill App2d 437, 205 NE2d 62 ) to sustain a conviction for forgery and, since the drafters of our new Criminal Code stated they were only codifying the existing law, a like requirement now obtains.

1962The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Medical Practice Act in People v. Walder, 317 Ill 524, 148 NE 287 ; People v. Hawkinson, 324 Ill 285, 155 NE 318 ; People v. Puckett, 324 Ill 293, 155 NE 319 .

1962The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Medical Practice Act in People v. Walder, 317 Ill 524, 148 NE 287 ; People v. Hawkinson, 324 Ill 285, 155 NE 318 ; People v. Puckett, 324 Ill 293, 155 NE 319 .

1962The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Medical Practice Act in People v. Walder, 317 Ill 524, 148 NE 287 ; People v. Hawkinson, 324 Ill 285, 155 NE 318 ; People v. Puckett, 324 Ill 293, 155 NE 319 .

1948This court, previous to the adoption of the present statute, arrived at a like test for the date of “disablement” in the case of Madison v. Wedron Silica Co. 352 Ill. 60 .

1947In People v. Grady, 381 Ill. 224 , we held a like instruction did not nullify self-defense.

1947He may think he knows, but experience shows that the most far-sighted minds are often mistaken as to what they think will be the probable results of actions that they are taking.” A like instruction was held bad in Turnbull v. Butterfield, 304 Ill. 454 .

1943Co. v. Nonn, 133 Ill.

1942If the jury, after considering all the evidence in this case, find from the evidence that any witness has, or witnesses have, knowingly, wilfully and corruptly testified falsely to any fact material to the issue in this case, they have the right to entirely disregard the testimony of such witness or witnesses, except in so far as his or their testimony is corroborated by other credible evidence or by circumstances in evidence.” The defendant urges that the said instruction was prejudicial to the defendant in this case and its giving was error, and cites in support of his contention the case of

1942If the jury, after considering all the evidence in this case, find from the evidence that any witness has, or witnesses have, knowingly, wilfully and corruptly testified falsely to any fact material to the issue in this case, they have the right to entirely disregard the testimony of such witness or witnesses, except in so far as his or their testimony is corroborated by other credible evidence or by circumstances in evidence.” The defendant urges that the said instruction was prejudicial to the defendant in this case and its giving was error, and cites in support of his contention the case of

1942If the jury, after considering all the evidence in this case, find from the evidence that any witness has, or witnesses have, knowingly, wilfully and corruptly testified falsely to any fact material to the issue in this case, they have the right to entirely disregard the testimony of such witness or witnesses, except in so far as his or their testimony is corroborated by other credible evidence or by circumstances in evidence.” The defendant urges that the said instruction was prejudicial to the defendant in this case and its giving was error, and cites in support of his contention the case of

1941The court gave an instruction telling the jury that if, at the time of the alleged attack, complaining witness “was paralyzed by fear caused by threats and intimidation, she would not be expected to make resistance or outcry; and •if the jury find that the superiority of defendant’s strength over hers was very great, she might not be able to make effectual resistance, and if the place where the alleged act occurred was so remote from all human help that an outcry would not prove availing, none need have been made, as the law does not require the doing of impossible or useless acts.” Plaintiff

1940It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed, but it is founded on general principles of policy which the defendant has the advantage of contrary to the real justice as between him and the plaintiff.” In Zeigler v. Illinois Trust and Savings Bank, 245 Ill. 180 , the court said: “There is no precise definition of public policy, and consequently no absolute rule by which a contract can be measured or tested to determine whether or not it is contrary to public policy.

1939In Goldberg v. Hoffman, supra, in passing upon a like claim and other questions similar to those raised here involving Waishwell’s right to intervene and to the extension of the receivership, we said at pp. 115 and 116: “It is also contended that the petitioner (appellee) was not entitled to the extension order because it was not a party and did not become a party to the instant cause.

1938Co. v. Bender, 146 Va. 312 , 131 S. F. 806, where a like claim was made the court said: “Dividends and reserve or surrender value cannot be anticipated to pay the premiums, the payment of which is the condition precedent by the very terms of the policies to the creation of the same.

1937A like analysis of Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Young, 159 Ill.

1937Defendant argues that the facts found in Spelina v. Sporry, 279 Ill.

1930Jones v. Sanitary District, 265 Ill. 98 ; Kuhn v. Eppstein, 239 Ill. 555 ; Bogart v. Brazee, 331 Ill. 160 .

1930Likewise in People v. Celmars, 332 Ill. 113 , the State’s attorney, after the court had sustained objections to a former like inquiry, persisted in asking a witness if he knew the defendant had been in the reformatory.

1930Jones v. Sanitary District, 265 Ill. 98 ; Kuhn v. Eppstein, 239 Ill. 555 ; Bogart v. Brazee, 331 Ill. 160 .

1930Jones v. Sanitary District, 265 Ill. 98 ; Kuhn v. Eppstein, 239 Ill. 555 ; Bogart v. Brazee, 331 Ill. 160 .