Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Drews Co., Inc. v. LEDWITH-WOLFE ASSOC., INC.green2 sentences2006Drews Co., Inc. v. Ledwith-Wolfe Assocs., Inc., 296 S.C. 207 , 371 S.E.2d 532 (1988), offers an erudite and comprehensive analysis of the standards governing recovery of lost profits: The crucial requirement in lost profits determinations is that they be “established with reasonable certainty, for recovery cannot be had for profits that are conjectural or speculative.” South Carolina Finance Corp., supra, at 122, 113 S.E.2d at 336 . 2006Drews Co., Inc. v. Ledwith-Wolfe Assocs., Inc., 296 S.C. 207 , 371 S.E.2d 532 (1988), offers an erudite and comprehensive analysis of the standards governing recovery of lost profits: The crucial requirement in lost profits determinations is that they be “established with reasonable certainty, for recovery cannot be had for profits that are conjectural or speculative.” South Carolina Finance Corp., supra, at 122, 113 S.E.2d at 336 . | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
SC FINANCE CORP. OF ANDERSON v. West Side Finance Co.
green
2 sentences2006Drews Co., Inc. v. Ledwith-Wolfe Assocs., Inc., 296 S.C. 207 , 371 S.E.2d 532 (1988), offers an erudite and comprehensive analysis of the standards governing recovery of lost profits: The crucial requirement in lost profits determinations is that they be “established with reasonable certainty, for recovery cannot be had for profits that are conjectural or speculative.” South Carolina Finance Corp., supra, at 122, 113 S.E.2d at 336 . 1988The crucial requirement in lost profits determinations is that they be "established with reasonable certainty, for recovery cannot be had for profits that are conjectural or speculative." South Carolina Finance Corp., supra , at 122, 113 S.E. (2d) at 336 . | 3 | 1988–2006 |
Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.
green
1 sentence1979Adams v. Davison-Paxon, 230 S. C. 532, 96 S. E. (2d) 566 (1957); Boseman v. Pacific Mills, 193 S. C. 479, 8 S. E. (2d) 878 (1940); Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co., 190 S. C. 336, 2 S. E. (2d) 825 (1939). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Boseman v. Pacific Mills
green
1 sentence1979Adams v. Davison-Paxon, 230 S. C. 532, 96 S. E. (2d) 566 (1957); Boseman v. Pacific Mills, 193 S. C. 479, 8 S. E. (2d) 878 (1940); Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co., 190 S. C. 336, 2 S. E. (2d) 825 (1939). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.
green
1 sentence1979Adams v. Davison-Paxon, 230 S. C. 532, 96 S. E. (2d) 566 (1957); Boseman v. Pacific Mills, 193 S. C. 479, 8 S. E. (2d) 878 (1940); Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co., 190 S. C. 336, 2 S. E. (2d) 825 (1939). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Travers v. Jennings
green
1 sentence1941The rule is laid down in the case of Travers v. Jennings et al., 39 S. C., 410, 17 S. E., 849, 850 , by this Court as follows: “This, it seems to us, ought to be the crucial test in such matters, namely, the adoption, by the party who is required to seal, of something in its stead. * * * if pe jiac] used-sealing wax, and had stamped thereon his notarial seal, or had used sealing wax, and had writ *208 ten his name across the same, or if he had written his name across the flap of the envelope after he had caused it to adhere to the body of the envelope, it seems to us that any one of these meth | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.