Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maine opinions name it 1 courts 1912–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Town of Madison, Department of Electric Works v. Public Utilities Commissiongreen1 sentence1998Comm’n, 682 A.2d 231, 234 (Me.1996). [¶ 6] Section 1176 directs the manufacturer to: (i) approve or disapprove a claim for warranty reimbursement within thirty days of receiving a claim; (ii) notify a dealer of a disapproved claim within the thirty day period by a writing that details the reasons for the disapproval; and (iii) pay an approved claim within thirty days of the approval date. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence1991State v. Allen, 485 A.2d 953, 955 (Me.1984). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCrillisgreen1 sentence1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Philpot
green
1 sentence1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Gellers
green
1 sentence1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Matheson
green
1 sentence1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Sherburne
green
1 sentence1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Calanti
green
2 sentences1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . 1978See State v. McCrillis, supra; State v. Matheson, supra; State v. Sherburne, Me., 366 A.2d 1127 (1976); State v. Philpot, Me., 365 A.2d 122 (1976); State v. Gellers, Me., 282 A.2d 173 (1971); State v. Calanti, 142 Me. 59 , 46 A.2d 412 (1946). . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Conners' Case
green
1 sentence1932Upon such review the commissioner may increase, diminish or discontinue such compensation in accordance with the facts, as the justice of the case may require.” In Conner’s Case, 121 Me., 37, 115 A., 520 , it was decided that the Commission had no authority, statutory or inherent, to grant a rehearing on the merits of a case because of newly discovered evidence; and in Healey’s Case, 124 Me., 56, 126 A., 21, 22 , the Court approved the doctrine that “whether established correctly on general principles or not, so long as the facts on which the awarding of compensation was predicated continue to | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Healey's Case
green
1 sentence1932Upon such review the commissioner may increase, diminish or discontinue such compensation in accordance with the facts, as the justice of the case may require.” In Conner’s Case, 121 Me., 37, 115 A., 520 , it was decided that the Commission had no authority, statutory or inherent, to grant a rehearing on the merits of a case because of newly discovered evidence; and in Healey’s Case, 124 Me., 56, 126 A., 21, 22 , the Court approved the doctrine that “whether established correctly on general principles or not, so long as the facts on which the awarding of compensation was predicated continue to | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Field v. Brown
green
1 sentence1916The doctrine that denials and remonstrances, on or off the land are sufficient to rebut acquiescence, and work an interruption is supported by Workman v. Curran, supra; Nichols v. Ayler, 7 Leigh, 546 ; Field v. Brown, 24 Gratt., 74 ; Reid v. Garnet, 101 Va., 47 ; Stillman v. White Rock Mfg. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Hoag
green
1 sentence1916Co. v. Hoag, 90 Ill., 339 , which was a case where the owner orally remonstrated against the use, the court approved the doctrine of Powell v. Bagg, and went further, and held that it was not material where the remonstrance was made, whether on or off the land. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Reid v. Garnett
green
1 sentence1916The doctrine that denials and remonstrances, on or off the land are sufficient to rebut acquiescence, and work an interruption is supported by Workman v. Curran, supra; Nichols v. Ayler, 7 Leigh, 546 ; Field v. Brown, 24 Gratt., 74 ; Reid v. Garnet, 101 Va., 47 ; Stillman v. White Rock Mfg. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Huff v. Ford
neutral
1 sentence1912In Little v. Hackett, U. S. Sup. Ct., 116, 366, the court held that a person who hires a public hack and gives the driver directions as to the place to which he wishes to >be conveyed, but exercises no other control over the conduct of the driver, is not responsible for his acts or negligence, nor prevented from recovering damages against the railroad for injuries suffered from a collision of its train with the hack, caused by the negligence of both the engineer of the train and the driver, and cites with approval Quarman v. Burnett, and Jones v. Coropration of Liverpool, supra. In the case of | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.