parental immunity (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

parental immunity in Tennessee

6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Campbell v. Gruttemeyergreen
tenn · 1968 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Campbell v. Gruttemeyer, 222 Tenn. 133, 137 , 432 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1968); Turner v. Carter, 169 Tenn. 553, 555 , 89 S.W.2d 751, 751 (1936).

2001Campbell v. Gruttemeyer, 222 Tenn. 133, 137 , 432 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1968); Turner v. Carter, 169 Tenn. 553, 555 , 89 S.W.2d 751, 751 (1936).

11
Turner v. Cartergreen
tenn · 1936 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Campbell v. Gruttemeyer, 222 Tenn. 133, 137 , 432 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1968); Turner v. Carter, 169 Tenn. 553, 555 , 89 S.W.2d 751, 751 (1936).

2001Campbell v. Gruttemeyer, 222 Tenn. 133, 137 , 432 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1968); Turner v. Carter, 169 Tenn. 553, 555 , 89 S.W.2d 751, 751 (1936).

11
Cates v. Catesgreen
ill · 1993 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

11
Cook Ex Rel. Uithoven v. Spinnaker's of Rivergate, Inc.green
tenn · 1993 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994See Cook v. Spinnaker’s of Rivergate, 846 S.W.2d 810, 812 (Tenn.1993).

11
Hogan v. Hogangreen
illappct · 1982 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
11
Hill v. Giordanogreen
ala · 1984 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (2)

CaseNegativeCited
Barranco v. Jacksongreen
tenn · 1985 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1994–2005
2 sentences

1994This Court granted permission to appeal in order to re-examine the parental immunity doctrine, first adopted in this state in McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903), and most recently reaffirmed in Barranco v. Jackson, 690 S.W.2d 221 (Tenn.1985), a case in which the dissent advocated that parental immunity be abolished in “automobile tort” cases.

1994The majority in Barranco declined to discuss the substantive issue of whether the parental immunity doctrine should be modified, observing only that the doctrine “has continuing vitality and should be adhered to unless modified or changed by action of the General Assembly.” Id. at 222 .

12
Attwood v. Estate of Attwoodgreen
ark · 1982 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11

Also cited on this issue (27)

CaseCitedYears
Broadwell Ex Rel. Broadwell v. Holmes green
tenn · 1994
2 sentences

2005This Court limited the doctrine of parental immunity in Tennessee “to conduct that constitutes the exercise of parental authority, the performance of parental supervision, and the provision of parental care and custody.” Id. at 476-77 .

2001Less than 10 years later a unanimous Court, in Broadwell by Broadwell v. Holmes, 871 S.W.2d 471 (Tenn. 1994), modified the rule as follows (at page 476): Parental immunity in Tennessee is limited to conduct that constitutes the exercise of parental authority, the performance of parental supervision, and the provision of parental care and custody.

22001–2005
McKelvey v. McKelvey red
tenn · 1903
2 sentences

1994This Court granted permission to appeal in order to re-examine the parental immunity doctrine, first adopted in this state in McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903), and most recently reaffirmed in Barranco v. Jackson, 690 S.W.2d 221 (Tenn.1985), a case in which the dissent advocated that parental immunity be abolished in “automobile tort” cases.

1985The majority opinion in adhering to McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903), found it unnecessary to discuss the facts of this ease.

21985–1994
Glaskox by and Through Denton v. Glaskox green
miss · 1992
1 sentence

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

11994–1994
Hartman Ex Rel. Hartman v. Hartman green
mo · 1991
1 sentence

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

11994–1994
Jilani by and Through Jilani v. Jilani green
tex · 1988
1 sentence

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

11994–1994
Kirchner v. Crystal green
ohio · 1984
2 sentences

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

1994See, e.g., Cates v. Cates, 156 Ill.2d 76 , 189 Ill.Dec. 14 , 619 N.E.2d 715 (1993) (parental immunity limited to conduct inherent to parent-child relationship); Glaskox By and Through Denton v. Glaskox, 614 So.2d 906 (Miss.1992); (abrogated doctrine as it applies to negligent operation- of motor vehicle); Hartman By and Through Hartman v. Hartman, 821 S.W.2d 852 (Mo.1991) (abrogated doctrine in favor of reasonable parent standard); Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St.3d 326 , 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984) (parental immunity abolished entirely); Jilani By and Through Jilani v. Jilani, 767 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1

11994–1994
Holodook v. Spencer green
ny · 1974
2 sentences

1994Another approach to modifying the parental immunity doctrine was articulated by the New York Court of Appeals in Holodook v. Spencer, 36 N.Y.2d 35 , 364 N.Y.S.2d 859 , 324 N.E.2d 338 (1974), in which it was alleged that the minor child’s mother had negligently supervised her child when, as a result of being left untended, the child wandered into the street where she was struck by a passing automobile.

1994Another approach to modifying the parental immunity doctrine was articulated by the New York Court of Appeals in Holodook v. Spencer, 36 N.Y.2d 35 , 364 N.Y.S.2d 859 , 324 N.E.2d 338 (1974), in which it was alleged that the minor child’s mother had negligently supervised her child when, as a result of being left untended, the child wandered into the street where she was struck by a passing automobile.

11994–1994
Nocktonick Ex Rel. Matson v. Nocktonick green
kan · 1980
11985–1985
Schneider v. Coe green
del · 1979
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Felderhoff v. Felderhoff green
tex · 1971
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Black v. Solmitz green
me · 1979
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
McNeal v. Administrator of Estate of McNeal green
miss · 1971
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Wilkosz v. Wilkosz green
illappct · 1984
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Coleman v. Coleman green
gactapp · 1981
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Ard v. Ard green
fla · 1982
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. Hebel green
alaska · 1967
2 sentences

1985In Elam the Supreme Court of South Carolina abrogated the doctrine of parental immunity in its entirety. [5] Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn. Gen.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Rigdon Ex Rel. Rigdon v. Rigdon green
kyctapphigh · 1971
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Pullen v. Novak green
neb · 1959
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Horton v. Reaves green
colo · 1974
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream green
minn · 1980
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Dorsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance green
ohio · 1984
11985–1985
Pedigo v. Rowley green
idaho · 1980
11985–1985
Shell Oil Co. v. Ryckman green
mdctspecapp · 1979
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Turner v. Turner green
iowa · 1981
2 sentences

1985Stat. Ann. § 52 -572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz, supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mont., Transamerican Ins.

1985Alaska, Hebel v. Hebel, supra; Ariz., Streenz v. Streenz, supra; Calif., Gibson v. Gibson, supra; Conn., Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-572c; Del., Schneider v. Coe, supra; Fla., Ard v. Ard, supra; Hawaii, Petersen v. City and County of Honolulu, supra; Ind., Buffalo v. Buffalo (non custodial parent), supra; Iowa, Turner v. Turner, supra; Kan., Nocktonick v. Nocktonick, supra; Ky., Rigdon v. Rigdon, supra; La., Bondurant v. Bondurant, (non custodial parent), supra; Maine, Black v. Solmitz., supra; Mass., Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra; Mich., Plumley v. Klein, supra; Minn., Anderson v. Stream, supra; Mo

11985–1985
Owens v. Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. green
ala · 1937
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Rambo v. Rambo green
ark · 1938
2 sentences

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

1985Ala., Owens v. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co., 235 Ala. 9 , 177 So. 133 (1937); see also Hill v. Giordano, 447 So.2d 164 (Ala.1984); Ark., Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938); but see Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982) (immunity does not preclude suit for willful and wanton conduct); Colo., Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149 , 526 P.2d 304 (1974); Ga., Coleman v. Coleman, 157 Ga.App. 533 , 278 S.E.2d 114 (1981); Ill., Wilkosz v. Wilkosz, 124 Ill.App.3d 904 , 80 Ill.Dec. 249 , 464 N.E.2d 1232 (1984) (transporting child from school is not within the “beyo

11985–1985
Burns v. Commonwealth green
pa · 1889
11928–1928

Where else courts name it

TX 212 (1986–2026) CT 83 (1972–2006) PA 60 (1957–2026) AL 52 (1984–2026) MI 47 (1966–2025) UT 42 (1982–2024) MO 32 (1960–2025) IL 31 (1966–2004) FL 26 (1980–2025) VA 26 (1971–2026) MD 25 (1976–2022) IN 23 (1974–2026) NJ 20 (1960–2009) WA 20 (1979–2019) DC 20 (1985–2022) MA 18 (1975–2025) CO 17 (1974–2011) OH 16 (1981–2013) WV 14 (1968–2020) AR 14 (1980–2021) KY 14 (1970–2024) AZ 13 (1970–2021) NC 13 (1972–2024) MN 12 (1966–2026) OR 11 (1976–2016) CA 11 (1971–2025) IA 11 (1968–2022) NM 10 (1996–2025) WI 10 (1963–2005) NY 9 (1974–2013) MS 8 (1970–2016) SC 7 (1980–2001) KS 7 (1966–2025) ME 6 (1966–2000) TN 6 (1928–2005) DE 6 (1976–1997) GA 5 (1972–1993) ID 5 (1980–2011) OK 4 (1984–2023) WY 3 (1992–2023) MT 3 (1983–2025) NV 3 (1996–2013) SD 3 (2007–2025) LA 3 (1995–2016) ND 2 (2012–2012) HI 2 (2007–2026) NH 2 (1984–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check