Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
37 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnershipgreen2 sentences2010“Generally, if the agency’s interpretation of a rule corresponds with its plain meaning, or if the rule is ambiguous and the agency interpretation is a longstanding one, the agency is not deemed to have promulgated a new rule.” Id. 2004See Cable Communications Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Communications P'ship, 356 N.W.2d 658, 667 (Minn.1984) (if an agency's interpretation of a rule corresponds with its plain meaning, the agency is not deemed to have promulgated a new rule). | 4 | 7 |
State v. Barrettgreen2 sentences2013See State v. Barrett, 694 N.W.2d 783, 785 (Minn.2005); Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minn. & Wis. Lakes & Pines, 768 N.W.2d 385, 387 (Minn.App.2009). 2012State v. Barrett, 694 N.W.2d 783, 785 (Minn.2005). | 3 | 3 |
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.green2 sentences2024State v. Myhre, 875 N.W.2d 799, 803 (Minn. 2016). “[W]hen interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” State v. Gray, 987 N.W.2d 563 , 566 (Minn. 2023) (quoting Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598, 601 (Minn. 2014)). 2016See, e.g., Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598, 601 (Minn.2014). | 2 | 2 |
White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfaregreen2 sentences1988See White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare, 319 N.W.2d 7 (Minn.1982) (failure to comply with necessary procedures results in invalidity of a rule). 1988Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership, 356 N.W.2d 658, 667 (Minn.1984) (citing White Bear Lake, 319 N.W.2d at 8 ). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Whitleygreen2 sentences2009State v. Whitley, 649 N.W.2d 180, 183 (Minn.App.2002). 2004Whitley, 649 N.W.2d at 183 . | 1 | 2 |
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.green1 sentence2026Gams v. Houghton, 884 N.W.2d 611, 616 (Minn. 2016). 6 The principles of statutory interpretation apply to court rules. | 1 | 1 |
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhregreen1 sentence2024State v. Myhre, 875 N.W.2d 799, 803 (Minn. 2016). “[W]hen interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” State v. Gray, 987 N.W.2d 563 , 566 (Minn. 2023) (quoting Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598, 601 (Minn. 2014)). | 1 | 1 |
Dereje v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct: 1772, 188 L.Ed.2d 603 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn.2002). 2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn. 2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 1772 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Huggergreen2 sentences2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct: 1772, 188 L.Ed.2d 603 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn.2002). 2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn. 2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 1772 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Aubolgreen2 sentences2015State v. Aubol, 309 Minn. 323, 326 , 244 N.W.2d 636, 638 (1976) (footnote omitted). 2015State v. Aubol, 309 Minn. 323, 326 , 244 N.W.2d 636, 638 (1976) (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Underdahlgreen2 sentences2014Our task in interpreting procedural rules is to adopt the better interpretation of the rule’s text, see State v. Underdahl, 767 N.W.2d 677, 682 (Minn. 2009), whether or not the interpretation we adopt is more or less restrictive than a corresponding federal rule. 2014Our task in interpreting procedural rules is to adopt the better interpretation of the rule’s text, see State v. Underdahl, 767 N.W.2d 677, 682 (Minn.2009), whether or not the interpretation we adopt is more or less restrictive than a corresponding federal rule. | 1 | 1 |
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pinesgreen1 sentence2013See State v. Barrett, 694 N.W.2d 783, 785 (Minn.2005); Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minn. & Wis. Lakes & Pines, 768 N.W.2d 385, 387 (Minn.App.2009). | 1 | 1 |
Carlson v. Bloomington Housing Partners IIgreen1 sentence2010In re Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary Dist., 763 N.W.2d 303, 310 (Minn.2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Worthygreen1 sentence2010See Worthy, 583 N.W.2d at 277-78 (concluding that a district court did not abuse its discretion by proceeding with trial despite the absence of the defendants). | 1 | 1 |
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11green1 sentence2009Id. at 126-27. | 1 | 1 |
ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakotagreen1 sentence2007See ILHC of Eagan, 693 N.W.2d at 419 (noting that statutory provisions that exempt property from taxation should be strictly construed). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nerzgreen1 sentence2001State v. Nerz, 587 N.W.2d 23, 24-26 (Minn.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Casey v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemengreen2 sentences1997Casey v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 197 Minn. 189, 193 , 266 N.W. 737, 739 (1936); (3) the contractor’s interpretation of the waiver clause is inconsistent with the rule that absent a clear contractual intent of waiver, a negligent party should be held liable for its negligence. 1997Casey v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 197 Minn. 189, 193 , 266 N.W. 737, 739 (1936); (3) the contractor’s interpretation of the waiver clause is inconsistent with the rule that absent a clear contractual intent of waiver, a negligent party should be held liable for its negligence. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Deckergreen1 sentence1994State v. Decker, 181 N.W.2d 746, 748-51 (N.D.1970). | 1 | 1 |
Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence1991See Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Dept. of Transp., 447 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Minn.App. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbstgreen1 sentence1989An agency’s decision is accorded a “presumption of correctness.” Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808, 824 (Minn.1977). | 1 | 1 |
New London Nursing Home, Inc. v. Lindemangreen1 sentence1988See New London Nursing Home, Inc. v. Lindeman, Department of Economic Security, 382 N.W.2d 868, 871 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (“differences imposed by a statute must not result in allowing one to escape a burden which has been imposed on another under substantially similar circumstances and conditions”). | 1 | 1 |
| Amerigo Padovani v. Honorable Walter Bruchhausengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitken
green
2 sentences2018In re Aitken , 787 N.W.2d 152 , 158 (Minn. 2010). 2018Aitken , 787 N.W.2d at 158 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Kitts v. United States
green
1 sentence2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn. 2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 1772 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn. 2002). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Watson v. United States
green
1 sentence2016Dereje v. State, 837 N.W.2d 714, 720 (Minn.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct: 1772, 188 L.Ed.2d 603 (2014); State v. Hugger, 640 N.W.2d 619, 621 (Minn.2002). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
cluster 772969
green
1 sentence2002IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the announce clause of Canon 5(A)(3)(d)® shall be enforced in accordance with the interpretation of that clause by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 (8th Cir.2001). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Mold v. Iofredo
green
2 sentences1997Appellant relies on Kenzie v. Dalco Corp., 309 Minn. 495 , 245 N.W.2d 207 (1976), and In re Estate of Iofredo, 241 Minn. 335 , 63 N.W.2d 19 (1954). 1997Appellant relies on Kenzie v. Dalco Corp., 309 Minn. 495 , 245 N.W.2d 207 (1976), and In re Estate of Iofredo, 241 Minn. 335 , 63 N.W.2d 19 (1954). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.
green
2 sentences1997Appellant relies on Kenzie v. Dalco Corp., 309 Minn. 495 , 245 N.W.2d 207 (1976), and In re Estate of Iofredo, 241 Minn. 335 , 63 N.W.2d 19 (1954). 1997Appellant relies on Kenzie v. Dalco Corp., 309 Minn. 495 , 245 N.W.2d 207 (1976), and In re Estate of Iofredo, 241 Minn. 335 , 63 N.W.2d 19 (1954). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.
green
1 sentence1997Independent School District No. 877, 123 N.W.2d at 799 ; (4) the contractor is not a co-insured under the owner’s preexisting insurance policy with the owner and there is no clear intent to waive all rights for damages caused by fire to non-work property; and (5) as a policy matter, the contractor’s position does not encourage the contractor to exercise due care in its operations to avoid damages to the non-work property. *535 The contractor further argues that this case is controlled by Independent Sch. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co.
green
1 sentence1989Respondent cites In re Peoples Natural Gas Co., 389 N.W.2d 903 (Minn.1986), for the proposition that the improper promulgation of a rule does not render a correct interpretation of that rule incorrect. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Anderson v. Commissioner of Highways green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp. green | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| Berryhill v. Sepp green | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.