Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
CBDA Development, LLC v. Town of Thorntongreen2 sentences2021See CBDA Dev., LLC v. Town of Thornton, 168 N.H. 715, 721 (2016) (“zoning boards act in a quasi-judicial capacity when interpreting a zoning ordinance” (citations omitted)). 2021See CBDA Dev., LLC v. Town of Thornton, 168 N.H. 715, 721 (2016) (“zoning boards act in a quasi-judicial capacity when interpreting a zoning ordinance” (citations omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Lesnickgreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., State v. Lesnick, 141 N.H. 121, 129 (1996) (‘We agree with the State that the defendant’s threatening statements fall within the general rule that a defendant’s extrajudicial statement giving rise to a reasonable inference of guilt constitutes an admission. | 1 | 1 |
Kenison v. Duboisgreen1 sentence2012See Kenison v. Dubois, 152 N.H. 448, 451 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Appeal of Vicky Mortongreen1 sentence2009See id. at 78-79 . | 1 | 1 |
Whitehouse v. Rytmangreen2 sentences1988The possibility of such an interpretation can claim a further measure of support from the clarity of the provisions in question here, which are sufficiently certain to allow claims of breach to be resolved readily, see Sawin v. Carr, 114 N.H. 462, 465 , 323 A.2d 924, 926 (1974); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33(2), and to enable a reasonably certain computation of damages, see Whitehouse v. Rytman, 122 N.H. 777, 780 , 451 A.2d 370, 372 (1982); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, supra § 352. 1988The possibility of such an interpretation can claim a further measure of support from the clarity of the provisions in question here, which are sufficiently certain to allow claims of breach to be resolved readily, see Sawin v. Carr, 114 N.H. 462, 465 , 323 A.2d 924, 926 (1974); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33(2), and to enable a reasonably certain computation of damages, see Whitehouse v. Rytman, 122 N.H. 777, 780 , 451 A.2d 370, 372 (1982); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, supra § 352. | 1 | 1 |
Sawin v. Carrgreen2 sentences1988The possibility of such an interpretation can claim a further measure of support from the clarity of the provisions in question here, which are sufficiently certain to allow claims of breach to be resolved readily, see Sawin v. Carr, 114 N.H. 462, 465 , 323 A.2d 924, 926 (1974); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33(2), and to enable a reasonably certain computation of damages, see Whitehouse v. Rytman, 122 N.H. 777, 780 , 451 A.2d 370, 372 (1982); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, supra § 352. 1988The possibility of such an interpretation can claim a further measure of support from the clarity of the provisions in question here, which are sufficiently certain to allow claims of breach to be resolved readily, see Sawin v. Carr, 114 N.H. 462, 465 , 323 A.2d 924, 926 (1974); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33(2), and to enable a reasonably certain computation of damages, see Whitehouse v. Rytman, 122 N.H. 777, 780 , 451 A.2d 370, 372 (1982); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, supra § 352. | 1 | 1 |
Hardy v. Betzgreen2 sentences1978In other words, 11(b) applies not only to Luv’s alleged conduct, but also to Penthouse’s. *407 This interpretation of the clause accords with Hardy v. Betz, 105 N.H. 169, 175 , 195 A.2d 582, 585 (1963), wherein we recognized that “ ‘[t]he criminal law of a state or nation has no operation or effect beyond its geographical or territorial limits.’ ” Luv’s alleged conduct — sale of obscene material — occurred in New Hampshire. 1978In other words, 11(b) applies not only to Luv’s alleged conduct, but also to Penthouse’s. *407 This interpretation of the clause accords with Hardy v. Betz, 105 N.H. 169, 175 , 195 A.2d 582, 585 (1963), wherein we recognized that “ ‘[t]he criminal law of a state or nation has no operation or effect beyond its geographical or territorial limits.’ ” Luv’s alleged conduct — sale of obscene material — occurred in New Hampshire. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Hudd v. Timme
green
2 sentences1991In addressing the assertion that the changes violated Wisconsin’s single amendment requirement, the court concluded that such an interpretation of the requirement would “render it practically impossible to amend the constitution.” Id. at 335 , 11 N.W. at 790 . 1991In addressing the assertion that the changes violated Wisconsin’s single amendment requirement, the court concluded that such an interpretation of the requirement would “render it practically impossible to amend the constitution.” Id. at 335 , 11 N.W. at 790 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.