Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moen v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2003See Moen v. Thomas, 2001 ND 110, ¶ 13 , 628 N.W.2d 325 (citing Stormon v. Weiss, 65 N.W.2d 475, 520 (N.D. 1954)). 2003See Moen v. Thomas, 2001 ND 110, ¶ 13 , 628 N.W.2d 325 (citing Stormon v. Weiss, 65 N.W.2d 475, 520 (N.D. 1954)). | 3 | 3 |
Stormon v. Weissgreen2 sentences2003See Moen v. Thomas , 2001 ND 110, ¶ 13 , 628 N.W.2d 325 (citing Stormon v. Weiss , 65 N.W.2d 475, 520 (N.D. 1954)). 2003See Moen v. Thomas, 2001 ND 110, ¶ 13 , 628 N.W.2d 325 (citing Stormon v. Weiss, 65 N.W.2d 475, 520 (N.D. 1954)). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Leonardgreen2 sentences2003As the court stated in In re Conduct of Leonard, 308 Or. 560 , 784 P.2d 95, 100 (1989), expert witness testimony under these circumstances “amount[s] to nothing more than an oral brief as to why one particular construction of the governing disciplinary rule would not be violated by a particular hypothetical set of facts. 2003As the court stated in In re Conduct of Leonard, 308 Or. 560 , 784 P.2d 95, 100 (1989), expert witness testimony under these circumstances “amount[s] to nothing more than an oral brief as to why one particular construction of the governing disciplinary rule would not be violated by a particular hypothetical set of facts. | 2 | 2 |
Aho v. Maragosgreen2 sentences2006See generally, Aho v. Maragos, 1998 ND 107 , 579 N.W.2d 165 . 2006See generally, Aho v. Maragos, 1998 ND 107 , 579 N.W.2d 165 . | 1 | 1 |
St. Pierre v. Grondingreen1 sentence2000Pierre v. Grondin, 513 A.2d 1368, 1370 (Maine 1986) (resolving ambiguities against the grantor and in favor of the grantee). | 1 | 1 |
Windell v. Millergreen1 sentence2000N.D.C.C. § 47-09-13; Terrill v. Tuckness, 985 S.W.2d 97, 106 (Tex.Ct.App.1998) (discussing an interpretation presumption in favor of the grantee and against the drafter); Windell v. Miller, 687 N.E.2d 585, 589 (Ind.App.1997) (construing ambiguities in the grantee’s favor when the deed was prepared by the grant- or); St. | 1 | 1 |
Terrill v. Tucknessgreen1 sentence2000N.D.C.C. § 47-09-13; Terrill v. Tuckness, 985 S.W.2d 97, 106 (Tex.Ct.App.1998) (discussing an interpretation presumption in favor of the grantee and against the drafter); Windell v. Miller, 687 N.E.2d 585, 589 (Ind.App.1997) (construing ambiguities in the grantee’s favor when the deed was prepared by the grant- or); St. | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureaugreen2 sentences1992See Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 374 N.W.2d 71 (N.D.1985); Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 273 N.W.2d 692 (N.D.1978). 1992See Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 374 N.W.2d 71 (N.D.1985); Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 273 N.W.2d 692 (N.D.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Andrews v. O'HEARN
green
2 sentences2023Id. at 722 . 1986Andrews v. O’Hearn, M.D., 387 N.W.2d 716 (N.D.1986). | 2 | 1986–2023 |
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
1 sentence2001Id. [3] The special concurrence of Justice Neumann concludes this interpretation of the exception "completely gobbles up the exclusion, making it meaningless." That is not true. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
green
2 sentences1992See Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 374 N.W.2d 71 (N.D.1985); Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 273 N.W.2d 692 (N.D.1978). 1992See Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 374 N.W.2d 71 (N.D.1985); Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 273 N.W.2d 692 (N.D.1978). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Metry, Metry, Sanom & Ashare v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n
green
1 sentence1992The Supreme Court of Michigan explains the policy underlying this interpretation of a covered claim under these statutes, in Metry, supra, 267 N.W.2d at 697 : “We conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly, found that attorney fees for services rendered prior to insolvency are not covered claims. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Sandmann v. Petron
green
2 sentences1990Such barren interpretations of rules promote more uncertainty and litigation rather than less. 404 N.W.2d at 803 . 1990Such barren interpretations of rules promote more uncertainty and litigation rather than less. 404 N.W.2d at 803 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
green
2 sentences1974United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 346 , 68 S. Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). 1974United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 346 , 68 S. Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
In Re Estate of Elmer
green
1 sentence1974Deeming the interpretation of that rule by the Federal courts as highly persuasive, this Court in In re Estate of Elmer, 210 N.W.2d 815 (N.D.1973) stated that it is not the function of the appellate court “to decide factual issues de novo” and approved the Federal definitive test that, A finding is “clearly erroneous” only when, although there is some evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Company
green
2 sentences1974In Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Company, 257 Iowa 124 , 131 N.W.2d 772 (1964), the defendant company sent the summons and complaint, that instituted an action for personal injuries that resulted from an explosion, to its insurance carrier by messenger. 1974In Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Company, 257 Iowa 124 , 131 N.W.2d 772 (1964), the defendant company sent the summons and complaint, that instituted an action for personal injuries that resulted from an explosion, to its insurance carrier by messenger. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.