Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 1885–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. Lentzyellow1 sentence2024Id. ¶ 11 (citing Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. Lentz, 501 P.2d 266, 271 (Utah 1972)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
H.U.F. v. W.P.W.
green
2 sentences2012Indeed, this court followed this rule in H.U.F. v. W.P.W., 2009 UT 10 , 203 P.3d 943 . 2012Indeed, this court followed this rule in H.U.F. v. W.P.W., 2009 UT 10 , 203 P.3d 943 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Smith v. Smith
green
1 sentence2026This followed from the claim-preclusion branch of res judicata, which showed that “the ability to raise questions of jurisdiction expires after the last available opportunity to appeal final judgments on a particular set of issues has passed.” Id. ¶ 3 n.2. ¶117 If by “questions of jurisdiction,” we meant questions of jurisdiction other than subject-matter jurisdiction (as narrowly defined here), then I agree. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Scoggins
green
1 sentence1885The court followed the rule laid down, under a statute from which ours was copied, by the supreme court of California, in People v. Scroggins, 37 Cal. 676 , and which was approved in People v. Russell, 46 Cal. 121 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
People v. Russell
neutral
1 sentence1885The court followed the rule laid down, under a statute from which ours was copied, by the supreme court of California, in People v. Scroggins, 37 Cal. 676 , and which was approved in People v. Russell, 46 Cal. 121 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.