19 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1877–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Readgreen1 sentence2010Indeed, early cases interpreting the Criminal Code provision upon which Rule 3(c) is based acknowledged the desirability of accepting State appeals where it was important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law or “the correction of the error complained of will prevent a particular individual deemed guilty by the prosecuting officers from escaping from the meshes of the law.” State v. Withrow, 47 Ark. 551, 553 , 2 S.W. 184 , 184 (1886); see also State v. Graham, 1 Ark. at 433 (discussing the need for appeals in criminal cases to remedy the “great uncertainty and contrarie | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2015Smith, 266 Ark. at 864-65 , 587 S.W.2d at 52 . . 2015Smith, 266 Ark. at 864-65 , 587 S.W.2d at 52 . . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Waters v. Millsap
green
1 sentence2015Smith, 266 Ark. at 864–65, 587 S.W.2d at 52 . 9 Cite as 2015 Ark. 272 considered a security. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Withrow
green
1 sentence2010Indeed, early cases interpreting the Criminal Code provision upon which Rule 3(c) is based acknowledged the desirability of accepting State appeals where it was important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law or “the correction of the error complained of will prevent a particular individual deemed guilty by the prosecuting officers from escaping from the meshes of the law.” State v. Withrow, 47 Ark. 551, 553 , 2 S.W. 184 , 184 (1886); see also State v. Graham, 1 Ark. at 433 (discussing the need for appeals in criminal cases to remedy the “great uncertainty and contrarie | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Hartsfield v. State
green
1 sentence2002Hartsfield v. State, 76 Ark. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Collins v. State
green
2 sentences2001In Collins v. State, 280 Ark. 453 , 658 S.W.2d 877 (1983), the court said: It is the uniform rule that some mention of time must be included in the affidavit for a search warrant. . . . 2001In Collins v. State, 280 Ark. 453 , 658 S.W.2d 877 (1983), the court said: It is the uniform rule that some mention of time must be included in the affidavit for a search warrant. . . . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Henderson v. State
green
2 sentences1997Moore v. State, 317 Ark. 630 , 882 S.W.2d 667 (1994); Henderson v. State, 284 Ark. 493 , 684 S.W.2d 231 (1985). 1997Moore v. State, 317 Ark. 630 , 882 S.W.2d 667 (1994); Henderson v. State, 284 Ark. 493 , 684 S.W.2d 231 (1985). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Moore v. State
green
2 sentences1997Moore v. State, 317 Ark. 630 , 882 S.W.2d 667 (1994); Henderson v. State, 284 Ark. 493 , 684 S.W.2d 231 (1985). 1997Moore v. State, 317 Ark. 630 , 882 S.W.2d 667 (1994); Henderson v. State, 284 Ark. 493 , 684 S.W.2d 231 (1985). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Kollmeyer v. Greer
green
2 sentences1989KOLLMEYER v. GREER, 267 Ark. 632 , 636 , 593 S.W.2d 29 (1980). 1989KOLLMEYER v. GREER, 267 Ark. 632 , 636 , 593 S.W.2d 29 (1980). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Gainey
green
2 sentences1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 , 93 S.Ct. 2357 , 37 L.Ed.2d 380 (1973), that statutes creating criminal law inferences may be interpreted to preserve the trial court's traditional discretion in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury and in charging the jury, and cited Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S.Ct. 642 , 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970) and United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63 , 85 S.Ct. 754 , 13 L.Ed.2d 658 (1965), as holding the court's discretion to be inherent in 1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 , 93 S.Ct. 2357 , 37 L.Ed.2d 380 (1973), that statutes creating criminal law inferences may be interpreted to preserve the trial court's traditional discretion in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury and in charging the jury, and cited Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S.Ct. 642 , 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970) and United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63 , 85 S.Ct. 754 , 13 L.Ed.2d 658 (1965), as holding the court's discretion to be inherent in | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Turner v. United States
green
2 sentences1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 , 93 S.Ct. 2357 , 37 L.Ed.2d 380 (1973), that statutes creating criminal law inferences may be interpreted to preserve the trial court's traditional discretion in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury and in charging the jury, and cited Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S.Ct. 642 , 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970) and United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63 , 85 S.Ct. 754 , 13 L.Ed.2d 658 (1965), as holding the court's discretion to be inherent in 1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 , 93 S.Ct. 2357 , 37 L.Ed.2d 380 (1973), that statutes creating criminal law inferences may be interpreted to preserve the trial court's traditional discretion in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury and in charging the jury, and cited Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S.Ct. 642 , 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970) and United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63 , 85 S.Ct. 754 , 13 L.Ed.2d 658 (1965), as holding the court's discretion to be inherent in | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Barnes v. United States
green
2 sentences1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, — U.S. —, 93 S. Ct. 2357 , 37 L. 1973Only recently Mr. Justice Powell pointed out in a footnote to the majority opinion in Barnes v. United States, — U.S. —, 93 S. Ct. 2357 , 37 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
O'Hanlon Co. v. Jess
green
2 sentences1955Auzerais v. Naglee, 74 Calif. 68, 15 P. 371 ; O’Hanlon Co. v. Jess, 58 Mont. 415 , 193 P. 65 , 14 A.L.R. 237 ; Delabarre v. McAlpin, 101 App. Div. 468 , 92 N.Y.S. 129 ; Rest., Contracts, § 422; Williston on Contracts, § 1863. 1955Auzerais v. Naglee, 74 Calif. 68, 15 P. 371 ; O’Hanlon Co. v. Jess, 58 Mont. 415 , 193 P. 65 , 14 A.L.R. 237 ; Delabarre v. McAlpin, 101 App. Div. 468 , 92 N.Y.S. 129 ; Rest., Contracts, § 422; Williston on Contracts, § 1863. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Delabarre v. McAlpin
neutral
2 sentences1955Auzerais v. Naglee, 74 Calif. 68, 15 P. 371 ; O’Hanlon Co. v. Jess, 58 Mont. 415 , 193 P. 65 , 14 A.L.R. 237 ; Delabarre v. McAlpin, 101 App. Div. 468 , 92 N.Y.S. 129 ; Rest., Contracts, § 422; Williston on Contracts, § 1863. 1955Auzerais v. Naglee, 74 Calif. 68, 15 P. 371 ; O’Hanlon Co. v. Jess, 58 Mont. 415 , 193 P. 65 , 14 A.L.R. 237 ; Delabarre v. McAlpin, 101 App. Div. 468 , 92 N.Y.S. 129 ; Rest., Contracts, § 422; Williston on Contracts, § 1863. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Auzerais v. Naglee
green
1 sentence1955Auzerais v. Naglee, 74 Calif. 68, 15 P. 371 ; O’Hanlon Co. v. Jess, 58 Mont. 415 , 193 P. 65 , 14 A.L.R. 237 ; Delabarre v. McAlpin, 101 App. Div. 468 , 92 N.Y.S. 129 ; Rest., Contracts, § 422; Williston on Contracts, § 1863. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
McDaniel v. McDaniel
neutral
2 sentences1954Mrs. Brittain, whatever her motive, had a right to dispose of her property as she saw fit. “ * * Hence, courts have, with great uniformity, in this class of cases, required the proof that should destroy the recitals in a solemn instrument to be clear, specific, satisfactory, and of such a character as to leave in the mind of the chancellor no hesitation or substantial doubt,’ ” McDaniel v. McDaniel, 220 Ark. 614 , 249 S. W. 2d 125 . 1954Mrs. Brittain, whatever her motive, had a right to dispose of her property as she saw fit. “ * * Hence, courts have, with great uniformity, in this class of cases, required the proof that should destroy the recitals in a solemn instrument to be clear, specific, satisfactory, and of such a character as to leave in the mind of the chancellor no hesitation or substantial doubt,’ ” McDaniel v. McDaniel, 220 Ark. 614 , 249 S. W. 2d 125 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Hershy v. Clark
neutral
2 sentences1950Hershy v. Clark, 35 Ark. 17 , 37 Am. 1950Hershy v. Clark, 35 Ark. 17 , 37 Am.Rep. 1 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Clyde Mallory Lines v. State Ex Rel. State Docks Commission
neutral
2 sentences1941The power is- exclusive in Congress in the former, but not in the latter class.” 18 As late as 1935 the Supreme Court of the United States, 19 in a case appealed from the Supreme Court of Alabama, 229 Ala. 624 , 159 So. 53 , (see footnote) 20 held that state regulations incidentally affecting interstate commerce were not invalid. 1941The power is- exclusive in Congress in the former, but not in the latter class.” 18 As late as 1935 the Supreme Court of the United States, 19 in a case appealed from the Supreme Court of Alabama, 229 Ala. 624 , 159 So. 53 , (see footnote) 20 held that state regulations incidentally affecting interstate commerce were not invalid. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Taylor v. King
neutral
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Hunt
green
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Co.
neutral
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Newton v. Altheimer
neutral
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Stevens v. Shull
green
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Maddux
neutral
2 sentences1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . 1932Taylor v. King, 135 Ark. 43 , 204 S. W. 614 , and cases cited; Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S. W. 517 ; Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Company, 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S. W. 627 ; Newton v. Altheimer, 170 Ark. 366 , 280 S. W. 641 ; Stevens v. Shull, 179 Ark. 766 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; and Blackwell Oil & Gas Company v. Maddox, 182 Ark. 1152 , 34 S. W. (2d) 450 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Thomason v. Craighead
neutral
1 sentence1914Sessions v. Peay, 23 Ark. 41 ; Thomason v. Craighead, 32 Ark. 391 ; Wells v. Rice et al., 34 Ark. 346 ; Apple v. Kelley, 47 Ark. 413 ; State National Bank v. Neel, 52 Ark. 110 ; Stotts v. Brookfield, 55 Ark. 307 .’ The sale of the lands under the decree of chancery court in the instant cáse was therefore not complete until the commissioner had made his report and until the sale had been confirmed. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Wells v. Rice
neutral
1 sentence1914Sessions v. Peay, 23 Ark. 41 ; Thomason v. Craighead, 32 Ark. 391 ; Wells v. Rice et al., 34 Ark. 346 ; Apple v. Kelley, 47 Ark. 413 ; State National Bank v. Neel, 52 Ark. 110 ; Stotts v. Brookfield, 55 Ark. 307 .’ The sale of the lands under the decree of chancery court in the instant cáse was therefore not complete until the commissioner had made his report and until the sale had been confirmed. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Apel v. Kelsey
neutral
1 sentence1914Sessions v. Peay, 23 Ark. 41 ; Thomason v. Craighead, 32 Ark. 391 ; Wells v. Rice et al., 34 Ark. 346 ; Apple v. Kelley, 47 Ark. 413 ; State National Bank v. Neel, 52 Ark. 110 ; Stotts v. Brookfield, 55 Ark. 307 .’ The sale of the lands under the decree of chancery court in the instant cáse was therefore not complete until the commissioner had made his report and until the sale had been confirmed. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Stotts v. Brookfield
neutral
1 sentence1914Sessions v. Peay, 23 Ark. 41 ; Thomason v. Craighead, 32 Ark. 391 ; Wells v. Rice et al., 34 Ark. 346 ; Apple v. Kelley, 47 Ark. 413 ; State National Bank v. Neel, 52 Ark. 110 ; Stotts v. Brookfield, 55 Ark. 307 .’ The sale of the lands under the decree of chancery court in the instant cáse was therefore not complete until the commissioner had made his report and until the sale had been confirmed. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Milwaukee Steamship Co. v. City of Milwaukee
green
2 sentences1913Const. of Ark., art. 16, sec. 5; Milwaukee Steamship Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 83 Wis. 590 , 53 N. W. 839 . 1913Const. of Ark., art. 16, sec. 5; Milwaukee Steamship Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 83 Wis. 590 , 53 N. W. 839 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Galliher v. Cadwell
green
1 sentence1911They proceed on the assumption that the party to whom laches is imputed has knowledge of his rights, and an ample opportunity to establish them in the proper forum; that by reason of his delay the adverse party has good reason to believe that the alleged rights are worthless, or have been abandoned; and that, because of the change in conditions or relations during this period of delay, it would be an injustice to the latter to permit him to now assert them.” Galliher v. Cadwell, 145 U. S. 368 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
| Chatfield v. Iowa & Arkansas Land Co. neutral | 1 | 1909–1909 |
| Davis v. Gaines green | 1 | 1897–1897 |
| National Bank v. Kimball green | 1 | 1896–1896 |
| Weeks v. City of Milwaukee green | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.