74 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1862–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Comes v. Microsoft Corp.green2 sentences2017The purpose of section 553.2 is to achieve “a uniform standard of conduct so that businesses will know what is acceptable conduct and what is not acceptable conduct.” Comes v. Microsoft Corp., 646 N.W.2d 440, 446 (Iowa 2003). 2017The purpose of section 553.2 is to achieve “a uniform standard of conduct so that businesses will know what is acceptable conduct and what is not acceptable conduct.” Comes v. Microsoft Corp., 646 N.W.2d 440, 446 (Iowa 2002). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Deandagreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649, 650-51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to 2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649 , 650–51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to | 2 | 3 |
State v. Ruddgreen2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 2 | 2 |
State v. Monroegreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649, 650-51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to 2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649 , 650–51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to | 2 | 2 |
State v. McKettrickgreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649, 650-51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to 2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649 , 650–51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to | 2 | 2 |
State v. Beetsgreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649, 650-51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to 2015See, e.g., State v. Beets, 528 N.W.2d 521, 523 (Iowa 1995) (finding a uniform instruction regarding the offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse was not a correct statement of the law); State v. McKettrick, 480 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1992) (concluding uniform criminal jury instructions did not correctly state elements of assault causing bodily injury); State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649 , 650–51 (Iowa 1974) (holding uniform instruction given on entrapment was erroneous as, among other things, it “ignore[d] the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis” and “fail[ed] to | 2 | 2 |
Thompson v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2001See Thompson, 484 U.S. at 177 n. 2, 108 S.Ct. at 515 n. 2, 98 L.Ed.2d at 518 n. 2. 2001See Thompson, 484 U.S. at 177 n. 2, 108 S.Ct. at 515 n. 2, 98 L.Ed.2d at 518 n. 2. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Weavergreen2 sentences1998The instruction in Weaver was based upon a uniform instruction, and we said we were “reluctant to disapprove uniform instructions.” Id. 1994State v. Weaver, 405 N.W.2d 852, 855 (Iowa 1987). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Vealgreen2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 1 | 1 |
State v. Canalgreen2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 1 | 1 |
Moon v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See State v. Bielfelt, No. 19-0201, 2020 WL 3264373 , at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. June 17, 2020) (“We find [the] challenge to the uniform instruction unpersuasive . . . .”); Braggs v. State, No. 11-0942, 2013 WL 2637810 , at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. June 12, 2013) (“[T]he jury instruction . . . merely instructed the jury on how to consider the evidence, particularly in light of the fact it is nearly identical to the uniform instruction and is not a misstatement of law.”); Moon v. State, No. 05-0816, 2007 WL 1345732, at *8 (Iowa Ct. App. May 9, 2007) (“These instructions simply note the ways in which the jur | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garmangreen2 sentences2024But in State v. Garman, 93 N.W.2d 105, 107 (Iowa 1958), our supreme court said “that emancipation by marriage as provided for in section 599.1 applies only to the civil concepts of minority and emancipation and not to criminal cases.” In reaching this conclusion, the court in Garman reasoned that “it is as essential for the protection and welfare of both the child and the public that marriage should not exclude the child from the benevolent operation of the law.” Garman, 93 N.W.2d at 106 (citation omitted); accord City of Des Moines v. Reisman, 83 N.W.2d 197, 199 (Iowa 1957) (observing that “[ 2024But in State v. Garman, 93 N.W.2d 105, 107 (Iowa 1958), our supreme court said “that emancipation by marriage as provided for in section 599.1 applies only to the civil concepts of minority and emancipation and not to criminal cases.” In reaching this conclusion, the court in Garman reasoned that “it is as essential for the protection and welfare of both the child and the public that marriage should not exclude the child from the benevolent operation of the law.” Garman, 93 N.W.2d at 106 (citation omitted); accord City of Des Moines v. Reisman, 83 N.W.2d 197, 199 (Iowa 1957) (observing that “[ | 1 | 1 |
City of Des Moines v. Reismangreen1 sentence2024But in State v. Garman, 93 N.W.2d 105, 107 (Iowa 1958), our supreme court said “that emancipation by marriage as provided for in section 599.1 applies only to the civil concepts of minority and emancipation and not to criminal cases.” In reaching this conclusion, the court in Garman reasoned that “it is as essential for the protection and welfare of both the child and the public that marriage should not exclude the child from the benevolent operation of the law.” Garman, 93 N.W.2d at 106 (citation omitted); accord City of Des Moines v. Reisman, 83 N.W.2d 197, 199 (Iowa 1957) (observing that “[ | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hattergreen1 sentence2022But deviations are allowed, especially when “[t]he deviations from the uniform instruction do not significantly change the definition of [the crime] and do not deprive defendant of any defense.” State v. Hatter, 414 N.W.2d 333, 336 (Iowa 1987). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Klawonngreen1 sentence2021And we have considered a sentencing court to be in the category of a public official when applying “the uniform rule . . . that the word ‘shall,’ when addressed to public officials, is mandatory and excludes the idea of discretion.” State v. Klawonn, 609 N.W.2d 515, 522 (Iowa 2000) (citation omitted) (finding the word “shall” in Iowa Code section 910.3B created a duty on the sentencing court to impose restitution). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Buchanangreen1 sentence2021Uniform instruction 200.3 states, “For the defendant to [know][have knowledge of] something means 12 [he][she] had a conscious awareness that (element requiring knowledge).” Iowa State Bar Ass’n, Iowa Criminal Jury Instruction 200.3 (2019); see also State v. Buchanan, 549 N.W.2d 291, 294 (Iowa 1996) (citing uniform instruction 200.3 with approval); State v. Simmer, No. 14-1323, 2015 WL 4642792 , at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2015) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Novak Heating & Air Conditioning v. Carrier Corp.green1 sentence2020See Novak Heating & Air Conditioning v. Carrier Corp., 622 N.W.2d 495, 497 (Iowa 2001). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andersongreen1 sentence2018Separate from his complaint about counsel’s performance, Brownlee contends the district court had a duty, even without being asked, to instruct the jury about the need to corroborate Tanesha’s testimony. 6 Brownlee relies on State v. Anderson, 38 N.W.2d 662, 665 (Iowa 1949), which states: “It is prejudicial error to fail to instruct even without request on the requirement of corroboration where the 6 Brownlee quotes this uniform instruction: An ‘accomplice’ is a person who knowingly and voluntarily cooperates or aids in the commission of a crime. | 1 | 1 |
Belmar v. Cipollagreen2 sentences2018See id. 6 Iowa Code section 553.2 states: This chapter shall be construed to complement and be harmonized with the applied laws of the United States which have the same or similar purpose as this chapter. 2018See id. 6 Iowa Code section 553.2 states: This chapter shall be construed to complement and be harmonized with the applied laws of the United States which have the same or similar purpose as this chapter. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jamesgreen2 sentences2018(Emphasis added.) The jury was also instructed: “For the defendant to know something means he had a conscious awareness that he was acting in a manner which created a substantial risk to A.S.’s physical, mental or emotional health or safety." We acknowledge our supreme court has held the instructions used here “did not require the jury to find the defendant had a conscious awareness that [his] actions created a substantial risk to the child’s physical, mental, or emotional health or safety.”3 State v. James, 693 N.W.2d 353, 355-57 (Iowa 2005) 3 The uniform instruction for this offense has been 2018“It is the appreciation of the probable risks to others posed by one’s conduct that creates culpability for criminal endangerment.” Id. at 355 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Beckergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Kellogggreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Philpottgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Ruppgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Schulergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Grefe & Sidney v. Wattersgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hansen v. Hendersongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Munson v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Divisiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Diehl v. Diehlgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. McMullingreen | 1 | 1 |
| cluster 493324green | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Doughtygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Olson v. Hodgesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Cuevasgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. McKeegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Whitesidegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Seehangreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Weltongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Ostrandergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Templetongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Newton v. Board of Supervisors
neutral
2 sentences2000The uniform rule seems to be that the word `shall,' when addressed to public officials, is mandatory and excludes the idea of discretion." Hansen v. Henderson, 244 Iowa 650, 665 , 56 N.W.2d 59, 67 (1952) (quoting City of Newton v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Iowa 27, 30 , 112 N.W. 167 , 168 (1907) (citations omitted)). 2000The uniform rule seems to be that the word ‘shall,’ when addressed to public officials, is mandatory and excludes the idea of discretion.” Hansen v. Henderson, 244 Iowa 650, 665 , 56 N.W.2d 59, 67 (1952) (quoting City of Newton v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Iowa 27, 30 , 112 N.W. 167 , 168 (1907) (citations omitted)). | 4 | 1921–2000 |
State v. Mullen
green
2 sentences1976Defendant contended the uniform instruction did not meet the problem addressed, in State v. Deanda, 218 N.W.2d 649, 650-651 (Iowa 1974), where this court held an earlier uniform instruction did not conform with the newly-adopted objective entrapment standard of State v. Mullen, 216 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1974). 1976The uniform instruction ignores the factual evaluation to be undertaken on a case by case basis of possible ‘ * * * prohibited governmental activity [which] might include extreme pleas of desperate illness, appeals based primarily on sympathy, pity or close personal friendship, and offers of inordinate sums of money. * * * ’ 216 N.W.2d at 383 . | 3 | 1974–1976 |
State v. Colligan
neutral
2 sentences1969In Fren-tress, speaking of the county’s right to take security for relief granted under chapter 252, Code, 1954, and earlier in State v. Colligan, 128 Iowa 536, 537 , 104 N.W. 905 which considered the question of recovering compensation of one cared for in a mental *135 hospital, we said “the uniform rule seems to be that there is no liability on the part of the person who receives such benefit, or on the part of his relatives, to make compensation save as such compensation may be expressly required and provided for by statute”. 1969In Fren-tress, speaking of the county’s right to take security for relief granted under chapter 252, Code, 1954, and earlier in State v. Colligan, 128 Iowa 536, 537 , 104 N.W. 905 which considered the question of recovering compensation of one cared for in a mental *135 hospital, we said “the uniform rule seems to be that there is no liability on the part of the person who receives such benefit, or on the part of his relatives, to make compensation save as such compensation may be expressly required and provided for by statute”. | 2 | 1958–1969 |
Fevold v. Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences1964In Fevold v. Board of Supervisors, 202 Iowa 3019 , 1034, 210 N.W. 139, 345 , we said: “It is the uniform rule that this constitutional requirement *1199 is not to be given a narrow or limited construction. 1931If there is a ‘unity of object’ in the various provisions, and that general object is indicated by the title, then, no matter how multifarious the provisions of the act, it sufficiently complies with the constitution. * * * ‘The constitution is obeyed if all the provisions relate to the one subject indicated in the title, and parts of it, or incident to it, or reasonably connected with it, or in some sense auxiliary to the object in view. ’ ’ ’ *738 In Fevold v. Board of Supervisors of Webster County, 202 Iowa 1019 , we said: “It is the uniform rule that this constitutional requirement is not | 2 | 1931–1964 |
Hallum v. Iowa
red
2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Hallum
green
2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Webb
green
2 sentences2026But we cannot believe the jury would have derived such an understanding from the instructions here, taken as a whole.” (footnote omitted)), 27 overruled on other grounds by, State v. Webb, 648 N.W.2d 72 (Iowa 2002). 2026But we cannot believe the jury would have derived such an understanding from the instructions here, taken as a whole.” (footnote omitted)), 27 overruled on other grounds by, State v. Webb, 648 N.W.2d 72 (Iowa 2002). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by Marriott
green
2 sentences2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen 2026An instruction is not required to track “the language of requested instructions so long as the topic is covered.” Id. at 141–42 (quoting State v. Veal, 564 N.W.2d 797, 812 (Iowa 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by, State v. Hallum, 585 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa 1998), vacated, 527 U.S. 1001 (1999)); see also State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528, 533 (Iowa 2009) (“Although the court could have phrased the instruction to say [as the defendant requested], ‘mere nudity does not constitute obscenity,’ Canal’s trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because of his failure to object to the gen | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Ripperger
green
1 sentence2021The court found the uniform instruction, taken as a whole, “cautioned the jury that the kidnapping charge must have independent significance.” Id. at 751 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.
green
1 sentence2017Instruction 18 is based on Iowa Uniform Jury Instruction 200.33, which is entitled “No Recovery for Second Injury” and provides: “If you find (plaintiff) was injured by another act after this incident, [he] [she] cannot recover for any later [injury] [aggravation of injury] not caused by this incident.” The uniform instruction cites as authority Becker v. D & E Distributing Co., 247 N.W.2d 727 (Iowa 1976), and Waterloo Savings Bank v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway, 60 N.W.2d 572 (Iowa 1953). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Waterloo Savings Bank v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railroad green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State of Iowa v. Kevin Deshay Ambrose green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State of Iowa v. Jonathan Q. Adams green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc. green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| State v. Johnson green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Coker v. Abell-Howe Co. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Quality Foods, Inc. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Anderson green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| State v. Everett green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| DeYarman Ex Rel. DeYarman v. State green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Seela v. Haye green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| State v. McGranahan green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| McCornack v. Pickrell green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Windus v. Great Plains Gas green | 1 | 1964–1964 |
| McKeever v. Batcheler green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Rich v. Herny green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| School Township of Seventy-Six of Muscatine County v. Nicholson green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Wisdom v. Board of Supervisors green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLean green | 1 | 1942–1942 |
| Johnston v. Johnston neutral | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Wilson v. Wilson green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Holmes v. Connable green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Boeck v. Milke green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Hart v. Hart green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.