Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
48 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1897–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v. Boards of Supervisors of Five Countiesgreen2 sentences2002Likewise, in East Grand Rapids School Dist v Kent Co Tax Allocation Bd, 415 Mich 381, 395-396 ; 330 NW2d 7 (1982), our Supreme Court echoed its earlier statement in Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v Bds of Supervisors of Five Counties, 304 Mich 328 ; 8 NW2d 84 (1943), in construing the language of Const 1963, art 9, § 3 before its amendment in 1994. “ ‘What is meant by the words ‘taxing by a uniform rule?’ And to what is the rule applied by the constitution? 2002Likewise, in East Grand Rapids School Dist v Kent Co Tax Allocation Bd, 415 Mich 381, 395-396 ; 330 NW2d 7 (1982), our Supreme Court echoed its earlier statement in Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v Bds of Supervisors of Five Counties, 304 Mich 328 ; 8 NW2d 84 (1943), in construing the language of Const 1963, art 9, § 3 before its amendment in 1994. “ ‘What is meant by the words ‘taxing by a uniform rule?’ And to what is the rule applied by the constitution? | 2 | 9 |
Harding v. Deissgreen2 sentences2004See Harding v Deiss, 300 Mont 312, 318 ; 3 P3d 1286 (2000) (citing contributory negligence cases and stating, “Under [comparative fault], in any case where the patient was responsible for events that led to her hospitalization, the treating physician would not be liable for negligent (continued . . . .) 6 The Court of Appeals stated: “It would be anomalous to posit, on the one hand, that a health provider is required to meet a uniform standard of care in its delivery of medical services to all patients, but permit, on the other hand, the conclusion that, where a breach of that duty is establis 2004See Harding v Deiss, 300 Mont 312, 318 ; 3 P3d 1286 (2000) (citing contributory negligence cases and stating, “Under [comparative fault], in any case where the patient was responsible for events that led to her hospitalization, the treating physician would not be liable for negligent (continued . . . .) 6 The Court of Appeals stated: “It would be anomalous to posit, on the one hand, that a health provider is required to meet a uniform standard of care in its delivery of medical services to all patients, but permit, on the other hand, the conclusion that, where a breach of that duty is establis | 2 | 2 |
Harvey Ex Rel. Harvey v. Mid-Coast Hospitalgreen2 sentences2004Given the preventable nature of many illnesses, to accept a contrary position would allow many health-care professionals to escape liability for negligently treating ill patients. [Shinholster v Annapolis Hosp, 255 Mich App 339, 347-348 ; 660 NW2d 361 (2003), quoting Harvey v Mid-Coast Hosp, 36 F Supp 2d 32, 38 (D Maine, 1999).] Stemming from its concern that “‘no liability may exist if the patient’s own preinjury conduct caused the illness or injury which necessitated the care,’” or that if a trier of fact was permitted to consider a plaintiff’s pre-treatment negligence in apportioning fault, 2004Given the preventable nature of many illnesses, to accept a contrary position would allow many health-care professionals to escape liability for negligently treating ill patients. [Shinholster v Annapolis Hosp, 255 Mich App 339, 347-348 ; 660 NW2d 361 (2003), quoting Harvey v Mid-Coast Hosp, 36 F Supp 2d 32, 38 (D Maine, 1999).] Stemming from its concern that “‘no liability may exist if the patient’s own preinjury conduct caused the illness or injury which necessitated the care,’” or that if a trier of fact was permitted to consider a plaintiff’s pre-treatment negligence in apportioning fault, | 2 | 2 |
| People v. Wichmangreen | 1 | 1 |
People v. Jablonskigreen2 sentences1996Regardless of the generic nature of the error, we believe that upon appellate review, a uniform test should be applied in all criminal cases to determine the effect the error may have had on the verdict. [Citation omitted.] Later, the court noted: We think it worthwhile to repeat here the caveat set forth in Younie v. State [ 272 Md. 233, 248 , 322 A.2d 211 (1974) ], that the harmless error rule "has been and should be carefully circumscribed for the reasons given in People v. Jablonski, 38 Mich.App. 33, 39 , 195 N.W.2d 777, 780 (1972), where it is said that: 'Continued expansion of the harmle 1996Regardless of the generic nature of the error, we believe that upon appellate review, a uniform test should be applied in all criminal cases to determine the effect the error may have had on the verdict. [Citation omitted.] Later, the court noted: We think it worthwhile to repeat here the caveat set forth in Younie v. State [ 272 Md. 233, 248 , 322 A.2d 211 (1974) ], that the harmless error rule "has been and should be carefully circumscribed for the reasons given in People v. Jablonski, 38 Mich.App. 33, 39 , 195 N.W.2d 777, 780 (1972), where it is said that: 'Continued expansion of the harmle | 1 | 1 |
| Greatrex v. Evangelical Deaconess Hospitalgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Teagan Transportation Co. v. Board of Assessorsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of Supervisors v. Auditor General
neutral
2 sentences1977People, ex rel St Mary’s Falls Ship Canal Co v Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 [1859]; Chippewa County Supervisors v Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 [ 32 NW 651 (1887)]; National Loan & Investment Co v Detroit, 136 Mich 451 [ 99 NW 380 (1904)]. 1963People v. Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 ; Board of Supervisors v. Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 ; National Loan & Investment Co. v. City of Detroit, 136 Mich 451 . | 3 | 1941–1977 |
People ex rel. St. Mary's Falls Ship Canal Co. v. Auditor General
green
2 sentences1977People, ex rel St Mary’s Falls Ship Canal Co v Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 [1859]; Chippewa County Supervisors v Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 [ 32 NW 651 (1887)]; National Loan & Investment Co v Detroit, 136 Mich 451 [ 99 NW 380 (1904)]. 1963People v. Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 ; Board of Supervisors v. Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 ; National Loan & Investment Co. v. City of Detroit, 136 Mich 451 . | 3 | 1941–1977 |
National Loan & Investment Co. v. City of Detroit
neutral
2 sentences1977People, ex rel St Mary’s Falls Ship Canal Co v Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 [1859]; Chippewa County Supervisors v Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 [ 32 NW 651 (1887)]; National Loan & Investment Co v Detroit, 136 Mich 451 [ 99 NW 380 (1904)]. 1977People, ex rel St Mary’s Falls Ship Canal Co v Auditor General, 7 Mich 84 [1859]; Chippewa County Supervisors v Auditor General, 65 Mich 408 [ 32 NW 651 (1887)]; National Loan & Investment Co v Detroit, 136 Mich 451 [ 99 NW 380 (1904)]. | 3 | 1941–1977 |
Shinholster v. Annapolis Hospital
neutral
2 sentences2004Given the preventable nature of many illnesses, to accept a contrary position would allow many health-care professionals to escape liability for negligently treating ill patients. [Shinholster v Annapolis Hosp, 255 Mich App 339, 347-348 ; 660 NW2d 361 (2003), quoting Harvey v Mid-Coast Hosp, 36 F Supp 2d 32, 38 (D Maine, 1999).] Stemming from its concern that “‘no liability may exist if the patient’s own preinjury conduct caused the illness or injury which necessitated the care,’” or that if a trier of fact was permitted to consider a plaintiff’s pre-treatment negligence in apportioning fault, 2004Given the preventable nature of many illnesses, to accept a contrary position would allow many health-care professionals to escape liability for negligently treating ill patients. [Shinholster v Annapolis Hosp, 255 Mich App 339, 347-348 ; 660 NW2d 361 (2003), quoting Harvey v Mid-Coast Hosp, 36 F Supp 2d 32, 38 (D Maine, 1999).] Stemming from its concern that “‘no liability may exist if the patient’s own preinjury conduct caused the illness or injury which necessitated the care,’” or that if a trier of fact was permitted to consider a plaintiff’s pre-treatment negligence in apportioning fault, | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Hogelskamp v. Weeks
neutral
2 sentences1982As Justice Sharpe, the dissenting member, clearly saw and so plainly articulated: "Under the uniform rule of taxation we have held that taxes cannot be imposed in disregard of any rule of *400 uniformity, Merrill v Humphrey, 24 Mich 170 (1871); and that the policy of the State is to secure uniformity and equality, Hogelskamp v Weeks, 37 Mich 422 (1877). 1946Under the uniform rule of taxation we have held that taxes cannot be imposed in disregard of any rule of uniformity, Merrill v. Humphrey , 24 Mich. 170 ; and that the policy of the State is to secure uniformity and equality, Hogelskamp v. Weeks , 37 Mich. 422 . | 2 | 1946–1982 |
Merrill v. Humphrey
green
2 sentences1982As Justice Sharpe, the dissenting member, clearly saw and so plainly articulated: "Under the uniform rule of taxation we have held that taxes cannot be imposed in disregard of any rule of *400 uniformity, Merrill v Humphrey, 24 Mich 170 (1871); and that the policy of the State is to secure uniformity and equality, Hogelskamp v Weeks, 37 Mich 422 (1877). 1946Under the uniform rule of taxation we have held that taxes cannot be imposed in disregard of any rule of uniformity, Merrill v. Humphrey , 24 Mich. 170 ; and that the policy of the State is to secure uniformity and equality, Hogelskamp v. Weeks , 37 Mich. 422 . | 2 | 1946–1982 |
Woodbridge v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences1943In Woodbridge v. City of Detroit, 8 Mich. 274, 294 ,. this court said: “The very term taxation, whether used in a constitution or elsewhere, signifies a. proportioned charge, upon some uniform standard, either of value or something else, which will afford a means of comparison. ’ ’ A constitutional provision requiring a uniform rule of taxation was considered in the ease of Exchange Bank of Columbus v. Hines, 3 Ohio St. 1 . 1943In Woodbridge v. City of Detroit, 8 Mich. 274, 294 ,. this court said: “The very term taxation, whether used in a constitution or elsewhere, signifies a. proportioned charge, upon some uniform standard, either of value or something else, which will afford a means of comparison. ’ ’ A constitutional provision requiring a uniform rule of taxation was considered in the ease of Exchange Bank of Columbus v. Hines, 3 Ohio St. 1 . | 2 | 1933–1943 |
Stewart v. Welton
green
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Wilson v. Bartholomew
green
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Anderson v. Odell
neutral
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Buckley v. Wheeler
neutral
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Emerson v. Bacon
neutral
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Fischer v. McIntyre
green
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Cullen v. Harris
green
2 sentences1924Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ; Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ; Anderson v. O’Dell, 51 Mich. 492 ; Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ; Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ; Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 66 Am. 1913Fischer v. McIntyre, 66 Mich. 681 ( 33 N. W. 762 ); Stewart v. Welton, 32 Mich. 56 ; Wilson v. Bartholomew, 45 Mich. 41 ( 7 N. W. 227 ) ; Anderson v. Odell, 51 Mich. 492 ( 16 N. W. 870 ); Buckley v. Wheeler, 52 Mich. 1 ( 17 N. W. 216 ); Emerson v. Bacon, 58 Mich. 526 ( 25 N. W. 503 ); Cullen v. Harris, 111 Mich. 20 ( 69 N. W. 78 , 66 Am. | 2 | 1913–1924 |
Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids
green
2 sentences1918Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids, 54 Mich. 641 ( 20 N. W. 623 ); Attorney General v. Board of Sup’rs of Sanilac Co., 71 Mich. 16 ( 38 N. W. 639 ); Standard Life & Accident Ins. 1918Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids, 54 Mich. 641 ( 20 N. W. 623 ); Attorney General v. Board of Sup’rs of Sanilac Co., 71 Mich. 16 ( 38 N. W. 639 ); Standard Life & Accident Ins. | 2 | 1902–1918 |
Taggart v. Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences1918Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids, 54 Mich. 641 ( 20 N. W. 623 ); Attorney General v. Board of Sup’rs of Sanilac Co., 71 Mich. 16 ( 38 N. W. 639 ); Standard Life & Accident Ins. 1902Comstock v. City of Grand Rapids, 54 Mich. 641 ( 20 N. W. 623 ); Attorney General v. Board of Supervisors of Sanilac Co., 71 Mich. 16 ( 38 N. W. 639 ); Standard Life & Accident Ins. | 2 | 1902–1918 |
Howard v. Coon
green
2 sentences1908See 1 Wood on Limitations (2d Ed.), § 8; Howard v. Coon, 93 Mich. 442 .’ ‘ ‘ The bill was filed upon the theory that the parties were partners. 1897See 1 Wood, Lim. § 8; Howard v. Coon, 93 Mich. 442 . | 2 | 1897–1908 |
Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of State
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of Troy
green
2 sentences2016WPW Acquisition Co v Troy, 250 Mich App 287, 304 ; 646 NW2d 487 (2002) (quotation marks omitted). 2016WPW Acquisition Co v Troy, 250 Mich App 287, 304 ; 646 NW2d 487 (2002) (quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Chen v. Wayne State University
green
1 sentence2015However, it bears repeating that an adverse employment action must be “materially adverse to the employee—that is, it must be more than a mere inconvenience” and “there must be an objective basis for demonstrating that the employment action is adverse because a plaintiff’s subjective impressions are not controlling.” Chen, 284 Mich App at 201-202 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Hurrell-Harring v. State
green
2 sentences2013Hurrell-Harring v State, 15 NY3d 8 ; 904 NYS2d 296 ; 930 NE2d 217 (2010). 2013Hurrell-Harring v State, 15 NY3d 8 ; 904 NYS2d 296 ; 930 NE2d 217 (2010). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Edward Rose Building Co. v. Independence Township
green
2 sentences2002Uniformity in taxing implies equality in the burden of taxation; and this equality of burden cannot exist without uniformity in the mode of the assessment, as well as in the rate of taxation.’ ” [Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority, supra, quoting Exchange Bank of Columbus v Hines, 3 Ohio St 1, 15 (1853).] See also Edward Rose Building Co v Independence Twp, 436 Mich 620, 640 ; 462 NW2d 325 (1990) (The uniformity requirement of the Michigan Constitution is concerned with uniformity in the mode of assessment and the rate of taxation and “compels the assignment of values to property upon the ba 2002Uniformity in taxing implies equality in the burden of taxation; and this equality of burden cannot exist without uniformity in the mode of the assessment, as well as in the rate of taxation.’ ” [Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority, supra, quoting Exchange Bank of Columbus v Hines, 3 Ohio St 1, 15 (1853).] See also Edward Rose Building Co v Independence Twp, 436 Mich 620, 640 ; 462 NW2d 325 (1990) (The uniformity requirement of the Michigan Constitution is concerned with uniformity in the mode of assessment and the rate of taxation and “compels the assignment of values to property upon the ba | 1 | 2002–2002 |
East Grand Rapids School District v. Kent County Tax Allocation Board
green
2 sentences2002Likewise, in East Grand Rapids School Dist v Kent Co Tax Allocation Bd, 415 Mich 381, 395-396 ; 330 NW2d 7 (1982), our Supreme Court echoed its earlier statement in Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v Bds of Supervisors of Five Counties, 304 Mich 328 ; 8 NW2d 84 (1943), in construing the language of Const 1963, art 9, § 3 before its amendment in 1994. “ ‘What is meant by the words ‘taxing by a uniform rule?’ And to what is the rule applied by the constitution? 2002Likewise, in East Grand Rapids School Dist v Kent Co Tax Allocation Bd, 415 Mich 381, 395-396 ; 330 NW2d 7 (1982), our Supreme Court echoed its earlier statement in Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v Bds of Supervisors of Five Counties, 304 Mich 328 ; 8 NW2d 84 (1943), in construing the language of Const 1963, art 9, § 3 before its amendment in 1994. “ ‘What is meant by the words ‘taxing by a uniform rule?’ And to what is the rule applied by the constitution? | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Smith v. Jones
green
2 sentences1998Moreover, it is well established that an employee has a “duty to minimize . . . damages by obtaining proper medical or surgical treatment.” Smith v Jones, 382 Mich 176, 186 ; 169 NW2d 308 (1969). 1998Moreover, it is well established that an employee has a “duty to minimize . . . damages by obtaining proper medical or surgical treatment.” Smith v Jones, 382 Mich 176, 186 ; 169 NW2d 308 (1969). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Dorsey v. State
green
2 sentences1996Regardless of the generic nature of the error, we believe that upon appellate review, a uniform test should be applied in all criminal cases to determine the effect the error may have had on the verdict. [Citation omitted.] Later, the court noted: We think it worthwhile to repeat here the caveat set forth in Younie v. State [ 272 Md. 233, 248 , 322 A.2d 211 (1974) ], that the harmless error rule "has been and should be carefully circumscribed for the reasons given in People v. Jablonski, 38 Mich.App. 33, 39 , 195 N.W.2d 777, 780 (1972), where it is said that: 'Continued expansion of the harmle 1996Regardless of the generic nature of the error, we believe that upon appellate review, a uniform test should be applied in all criminal cases to determine the effect the error may have had on the verdict. [Citation omitted.] Later, the court noted: We think it worthwhile to repeat here the caveat set forth in Younie v. State [ 272 Md. 233, 248 , 322 A.2d 211 (1974) ], that the harmless error rule "has been and should be carefully circumscribed for the reasons given in People v. Jablonski, 38 Mich.App. 33, 39 , 195 N.W.2d 777, 780 (1972), where it is said that: 'Continued expansion of the harmle | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1996It has done so without explaining why, or how, the uniform standard that this Court adopted in People v. Robinson, 386 Mich. 551 , 194 N.W.2d 709 (1972), is unsatisfactory. [1] Robinson restated the longstanding definition of harmless error: The appropriate considerations are described in People v. Wichman, 15 Mich. App. 110, 116 [ 166 N.W.2d 298 ] (1968): "Where it is claimed that error is harmless, two inquiries are pertinent. 1996It has done so without explaining why, or how, the uniform standard that this Court adopted in People v. Robinson, 386 Mich. 551 , 194 N.W.2d 709 (1972), is unsatisfactory. [1] Robinson restated the longstanding definition of harmless error: The appropriate considerations are described in People v. Wichman, 15 Mich. App. 110, 116 [ 166 N.W.2d 298 ] (1968): "Where it is claimed that error is harmless, two inquiries are pertinent. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Commonwealth v. Story green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Younie v. State green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| In Re WINSHIP green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| United States Cold Storage Corp. v. Detroit Board of Assessors green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| School District No. 9, Pittsfield Township v. Washtenaw County Board of Supervisors green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Duncan v. Strating green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| Wallace v. Skrzycki green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| People ex rel. Heller v. Heller green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| Degroot v. the Edison Institute neutral | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Hoyt v. City of East Saginaw green | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Grand Rapids School Furniture Co. v. City of Grand Rapids neutral | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Bruun v. Cook green | 1 | 1948–1948 |
| Stockwell v. Curtis neutral | 1 | 1948–1948 |
| School District v. City of Pontiac green | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.