uniform rule in Florida

17 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1926–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
Revels v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 2 sentences 2011Revels v. State, 666 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). 2011Revels v. State, 666 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).	1	1
Florida Bar re Untrachtgreen fla · 2006 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 . 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 .	1	1
Lester v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005But when significant subsequent events impacting the ultimate sentencing decision have transpired and the passage of time has likely deprived the initial sentencing judge of recollection of the specifics of his or her earlier sentencing decision, there would seem to be little benefit in a rule that would require recall of the original sentencing judge for violation of probation proceedings. [1] Our interpretation of the rule is also influenced by our recognition that a uniform requirement that original sentencing judges be recalled for violation of probation proceedings would be an "administra	1	1
Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggsgreen fla · 1995 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 1 sentence 2001See Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 , 530-31 & n. 14 (Fla.1995).	1	1
Hargrave v. Stategreen fla · 1978 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999See, e.g., Hargrave v. State, 366 So.2d 1, 8 (Fla.1978) (Hatchett, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Farr, 656 So.2d at 450-51 (Anstead, J. concurring).	1	1
Farr v. Stategreen fla · 1995 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999See, e.g., Hargrave v. State, 366 So.2d 1, 8 (Fla.1978) (Hatchett, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Farr, 656 So.2d at 450-51 (Anstead, J. concurring).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (26)

Case	Cited	Years
Matheson v. State green fladistctapp · 2003 2 sentences 2011In the absence of a uniform standard, the reliability of the dog cannot be established by demonstrating only that a canine is trained and certified. “[S]imply characterizing a dog as ‘trained’ and ‘certified’ imparts scant information about what the dog has been conditioned to do or not to do, or how successfully.” Matheson, 870 So.2d at 14 . 2011In the absence of a uniform standard, the reliability of the dog cannot be established by demonstrating only that a canine is trained and certified. "[S]imply characterizing a dog as `trained' and `certified' imparts scant information about what the dog has been conditioned to do or not to do, or how successfully." Matheson, 870 So.2d at 14 .	1	2011–2011
Florida Bar re Sanders green fla · 1991 2 sentences 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 . 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 .	1	2009–2009
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re R.L.V.H. green fla · 1991 2 sentences 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 . 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 .	1	2009–2009
The Florida Bar v. Eberhart green fla · 1994 2 sentences 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 . 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 .	1	2009–2009
Florida Board of Bar Examiners green fla · 2000 2 sentences 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 . 2009See Untracht, 923 So.2d at 459 ; Higgins, 772 So.2d at 486 ; Eberhart, 631 So.2d at 1098-99 ; R.L.V.H., 587 So.2d at 463 ; Sanders, 580 So.2d at 594 .	1	2009–2009
Sult v. State green fladistctapp · 2003 1 sentence 2005"By flashing the sheriff's identification card, Sult showed that she was trying to deceive the officers, and the officers believed that she was an employee of the sheriff's office who had committed a uniform violation." Id. at 804 .	1	2005–2005
Smith v. State green fla · 1992 1 sentence 1992In Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992), the Court concluded, as a uniform rule of retroactivity, “that any decision of this Court announcing a new rule of law, or merely applying an established rule of law to a new or different factual situation, must be given retrospective application by the courts of this state in every case pending on direct review or not yet final.” Id. at 214.	1	1992–1992
Ree v. State green fla · 1990 1 sentence 1992With specific regard to the requirement of Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), that any reasons for a departure sentence must be given by the trial judge contemporaneous to sentencing, the court held “that Ree shall apply to all cases not yet final when mandate issued after rehearing in Ree.” Smith, at 1066.	1	1992–1992
Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc. green fladistctapp · 1976 1 sentence 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).	1	1985–1985
Scarlett v. Frederick green fla · 1941 2 sentences 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).	1	1985–1985
Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. green fladistctapp · 1985 1 sentence 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).	1	1985–1985
Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington green fladistctapp · 1982 1 sentence 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).	1	1985–1985
Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley green fladistctapp · 1978 1 sentence 1985McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950); Scarlett v. Frederick, 147 Fla. 407 , 3 So.2d 165 (1941); Zentmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 464 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, 410 So.2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley, 362 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).	1	1985–1985
State Tax Commission v. Preece neutral utah · 1954 2 sentences 1968State Tax Comm. v. Preece, 1 Utah 2d 337 , 266 P.2d 757 ; Commonwealth ex rel. 1968State Tax Comm. v. Preece, 1 Utah 2d 337 , 266 P.2d 757 ; Commonwealth ex rel.	1	1968–1968
National Indemnity Co. v. Spring Branch State Bank green tex · 1961 2 sentences 1967National Indemnity Company v. Spring Branch State Bank, Tex. 1961, 162 Tex. 521 , 348 S.W.2d 528 , 8 A.L.R.3d 229 , 9 C.J.S. 1967National Indemnity Company v. Spring Branch State Bank, Tex. 1961, 162 Tex. 521 , 348 S.W.2d 528 , 8 A.L.R.3d 229 , 9 C.J.S.	1	1967–1967
Sunal v. Large green scotus · 1947 2 sentences 1966In Sunal v. Large, 332 U.S. 174 , 67 S.Ct. 1588 , 91 L.Ed. 198 (1946), the majority opinion was by Mr. Justice Douglas, while Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice 352 Rutledge wrote dissenting opinions. 1966In Sunal v. Large, 332 U.S. 174 , 67 S.Ct. 1588 , 91 L.Ed. 198 (1946), the majority opinion was by Mr. Justice Douglas, while Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice 352 Rutledge wrote dissenting opinions.	1	1966–1966
Richards v. State neutral fla · 1940 1 sentence 1955In Richards v. State, supra, in discussing Section 7486, C.G.L., 1927, which-used the same language as the section now-before us. we said, 197 So. at page 774 : “A study of the title and text of the Act can lead one to no other conclusion than that its purpose was to impose a uniform standard of moral conduct on all public officials.	1	1955–1955
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Hunter neutral fla · 1939 1 sentence 1947Under the statute and the rule, petitioner had sixty days from October 11, 1947, the date of the judgment appealed from, to bring it here for review, Sinclair Refining Company v. Hunter, 138 Fla. 89 , 190 So. 501 .	1	1947–1947
Dame v. Kempster neutral mass · 1888 1 sentence 1933Dame v. Kempster, 146 Mass. 454 .	1	1933–1933
Johnson v. Lindsey neutral fla · 1925 2 sentences 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity 840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity 840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower	1	1927–1927
Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. green la · 1910	1	1927–1927
Byrne v. Brown neutral fla · 1898 1 sentence 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity *840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower	1	1927–1927
Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co. neutral fla · 1910 1 sentence 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity *840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower	1	1927–1927
Gaines v. Russ neutral fla · 1910 1 sentence 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity *840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower	1	1927–1927
Sanford v. State green fla · 1918 2 sentences 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity 840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower 1927Courts of concurrent jurisdiction are of equal dignity 840 as to matters so cognizable and the uniform rule in both State and Federal jurisdiction is, “In cases of concurrent jurisdiction in different tribunals, the one first exercising such jurisdiction acquires control to the exclusion of the other.” Sanford v. State, 75 Fla. 393 , 78 Sou. 340 ; Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co., 59 Fla. 598 , 52 Sou. 589 ; Byrne v. Brown, 40 Fla. 109 , 23 Sou. 877 ; Gaines v. Ruse, 60 Fla. 317 , 53 Sou. 113 ; Johnson v. Lindsey, Sheriff, 89 Fla. 143 , 103 Sou. 419 , and cases there cited; Wade et al. v. Clower	1	1927–1927
Mach v. Mayo neutral fla · 1920	1	1926–1926

Where else courts name it

CA 185 (1862–2026) IL 101 (1862–2022) TX 88 (1883–2025) NC 78 (1883–2026) OK 75 (1901–2024) IA 74 (1862–2026) NY 68 (1835–2024) OR 51 (1890–2026) MI 48 (1897–2020) PA 45 (1840–2026) MO 44 (1858–1993) WA 42 (1897–2020) OH 41 (1860–2026) NM 40 (1915–2024) IN 39 (1874–2013) NJ 37 (1839–2025) LA 37 (1920–2015) KY 33 (1895–2024) WV 30 (1900–2021) KS 29 (1877–2021) NE 29 (1876–2022) MD 22 (1897–2024) CO 21 (1895–2025) WI 21 (1860–2023) AR 19 (1877–2015) MN 19 (1883–2018) CT 19 (1857–2023) FL 17 (1926–2011) GA 16 (1904–2022) TN 14 (1949–2019) WY 14 (1916–2006) AL 13 (1884–2008) AZ 13 (1932–2020) MA 12 (1841–2023) MT 12 (1922–2022) NV 10 (1867–2016) DC 9 (1974–2009) MS 8 (1953–2020) ME 7 (1903–2016) VA 7 (1918–2006) NH 6 (1867–2016) RI 6 (1867–2006) DE 6 (1942–2000) ID 6 (1906–2020) AK 5 (1995–2024) UT 5 (2004–2017) SD 5 (1909–2015) HI 4 (1883–1952) SC 4 (1939–2026) ND 4 (1904–2025) PR 4 (1916–1961) VI 3 (2009–2015) VT 2 (1994–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check