discretionary standard (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

discretionary standard in Idaho

18 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Grubegreen
idaho · 1994 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2006–2008
2 sentences

2008State v. Grube, 126 Idaho 377, 388 , 883 P.2d 1069, 1080 (1994).

2008State v. Grube, 126 Idaho 377, 388 , 883 P.2d 1069, 1080 (1994).

22
Wolf v. Stategreen
idaho · 1978 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020In Wolf v. State, 99 Idaho 476 , 583 P.2d 1011 (1978), the Idaho Supreme Court held that “[w]hile a number of jurisdictions do require a probable cause finding in conjunction with the waiver process, Idaho does not.” Id. at 479 , 583 P.2d at 1014 (citation omitted).

2020In Wolf v. State, 99 Idaho 476 , 583 P.2d 1011 (1978), the Idaho Supreme Court held that “[w]hile a number of jurisdictions do require a probable cause finding in conjunction with the waiver process, Idaho does not.” Id. at 479 , 583 P.2d at 1014 (citation omitted).

11
Hopper v. Hoppergreen
idaho · 2007 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See 144 Idaho at 626-27 , 167 P.3d at 763-64 .

2008See 144 Idaho at 626-27 , 167 P.3d at 763-64 .

11
State v. O'NEILLgreen
idaho · 1990 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997State v. O’Neill, 118 Idaho 244, 245 , 796 P.2d 121, 122 (1990).

1997State v. O’Neill, 118 Idaho 244, 245 , 796 P.2d 121, 122 (1990).

11
State v. Lavygreen
idaho · 1992 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994State v. Lavy, 121 Idaho 842, 845 , 828 P.2d 871, 874 (1992).

1994State v. Lavy, 121 Idaho 842, 845 , 828 P.2d 871, 874 (1992).

11
Desfosses v. Desfossesgreen
idahoctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See Desfosses v. Desfosses, 120 Idaho 354 , 815 P.2d 1094 (Ct.App.1991).

1992See Desfosses v. Desfosses, 120 Idaho 354 , 815 P.2d 1094 (Ct.App.1991).

11
State v. Roachgreen
idahoctapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
2 sentences

1991See State v. Roach, 112 Idaho 173 , 730 P.2d 1093 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447 , 680 P.2d 869 (Ct.App.1984).

1991See State v. Roach, 112 Idaho 173 , 730 P.2d 1093 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447 , 680 P.2d 869 (Ct.App.1984).

11
Johnson v. Stategreen
alaska · 1981 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 636 P.2d 47 (Alaska 1981). .Idaho became one of the few states with a design immunity statute when the legislature in 1971 enacted what is currently I.C. § 6-904(8).

1983See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 636 P.2d 47 (Alaska 1981).

11
Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of Americagreen
idaho · 1979 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983For certain, the opinion did not concern itself with the application of the discretionary exception, I.C. § 6-904(1), which as even Justice Bakes here concedes, was where “the parties in Dunbar focused their arguments ....” 1 The strange holding of Dunbar completely side-stepped the issue in favor of saying that to allow the widows and children of the deceased miners to pursue their claims of wrongful death against the State based on negligent mine inspection “would result in the creation of a new cause of action which we deem not to be contemplated by our legislature, and foreign to tradition

1983For certain, the opinion did not concern itself with the application of the discretionary exception, I.C. § 6-904(1), which as even Justice Bakes here concedes, was where “the parties in Dunbar focused their arguments ....” 1 The strange holding of Dunbar completely side-stepped the issue in favor of saying that to allow the widows and children of the deceased miners to pursue their claims of wrongful death against the State based on negligent mine inspection “would result in the creation of a new cause of action which we deem not to be contemplated by our legislature, and foreign to tradition

11
Dalehite v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1953 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
2 sentences

1979Reading the discretionary exception as we do, in a way both workable and faithful to legislative intent, we would hold that the Government was liable under these circumstances." 346 U.S. at 60 , 73 S.Ct. at 980 (Jackson, J., dissenting).

1979Reading the discretionary exception as we do, in a way both workable and faithful to legislative intent, we would hold that the Government was liable under these circumstances." 346 U.S. at 60 , 73 S.Ct. at 980 (Jackson, J., dissenting).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Dorea Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Blackfoot green
idaho · 2007
2 sentences

2019Id.

2019Id.

12019–2019
Blackmore v. RE/MAX TRI-CITIES, LLC green
idaho · 2010
1 sentence

2018This discretionary standard has frequently been cited as a "multi-tiered inquiry," e.g. , State v. Hedger , 115 Idaho 598 , 600, 768 P.2d 1331 , 1333 (1989) or even as a "three prong" standard, see Blackmore v. Re/Max Tri-Cities, LLC , 149 Idaho 558 , 563, 237 P.3d 655 , 660 (2010), which judges and lawyers alike can likely recite by heart.

12018–2018
Rich v. Re/Max Tri-Cities, LLC green
idaho · 2010
1 sentence

2018This discretionary standard has frequently been cited as a "multi-tiered inquiry," e.g. , State v. Hedger , 115 Idaho 598 , 600, 768 P.2d 1331 , 1333 (1989) or even as a "three prong" standard, see Blackmore v. Re/Max Tri-Cities, LLC , 149 Idaho 558 , 563, 237 P.3d 655 , 660 (2010), which judges and lawyers alike can likely recite by heart.

12018–2018
State v. Hedger green
idaho · 1989
2 sentences

2018This discretionary standard has frequently been cited as a "multi-tiered inquiry," e.g. , State v. Hedger , 115 Idaho 598 , 600, 768 P.2d 1331 , 1333 (1989) or even as a "three prong" standard, see Blackmore v. Re/Max Tri-Cities, LLC , 149 Idaho 558 , 563, 237 P.3d 655 , 660 (2010), which judges and lawyers alike can likely recite by heart.

2018This discretionary standard has frequently been cited as a "multi-tiered inquiry," e.g. , State v. Hedger , 115 Idaho 598 , 600, 768 P.2d 1331 , 1333 (1989) or even as a "three prong" standard, see Blackmore v. Re/Max Tri-Cities, LLC , 149 Idaho 558 , 563, 237 P.3d 655 , 660 (2010), which judges and lawyers alike can likely recite by heart.

12018–2018
State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap green
idaho · 2013
2 sentences

2018State v. Dunlap , 155 Idaho 345 , 363-64, 313 P.3d 1 , 19-20 (2013).

2018State v. Dunlap , 155 Idaho 345 , 363-64, 313 P.3d 1 , 19-20 (2013).

12018–2018
State v. Carrasco green
idaho · 1990
2 sentences

1992This discretionary standard of review was reaffirmed in State v. Carrasco, 117 Idaho 295 , 787 P.2d 281 (1990).

1992This discretionary standard of review was reaffirmed in State v. Carrasco, 117 Idaho 295 , 787 P.2d 281 (1990).

11992–1992
Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover green
idahoctapp · 1990
2 sentences

1991Sivak v. State, 112 Idaho 197 , 731 P.2d 192 (1986); Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover, 117 Idaho 530 , 789 P.2d 526 (Ct.App.1990).

1991Sivak v. State, 112 Idaho 197 , 731 P.2d 192 (1986); Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover, 117 Idaho 530 , 789 P.2d 526 (Ct.App.1990).

11991–1991
State v. Lopez green
idahoctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1991See State v. Roach, 112 Idaho 173 , 730 P.2d 1093 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447 , 680 P.2d 869 (Ct.App.1984).

1991See State v. Roach, 112 Idaho 173 , 730 P.2d 1093 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447 , 680 P.2d 869 (Ct.App.1984).

11991–1991
Sivak v. State green
idaho · 1986
2 sentences

1991Sivak v. State, 112 Idaho 197 , 731 P.2d 192 (1986); Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover, 117 Idaho 530 , 789 P.2d 526 (Ct.App.1990).

1991Sivak v. State, 112 Idaho 197 , 731 P.2d 192 (1986); Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover, 117 Idaho 530 , 789 P.2d 526 (Ct.App.1990).

11991–1991
Clemente v. State of California green
calctapp · 1980
2 sentences

1987As in Clemente, supra, [101 Cal.App.3d] at page 379, 161 Cal. Rptr. 799 , neither the discretionary immunity of section 820.2 nor the more specific discretionary immunity of failure to enforce a statute (§§ 821, 818.2) immunized the City from the legal consequences of the officers’ negligence in failing to remove the keys from the vehicle.

1987As in Clemente, supra, [101 Cal. App.3d] at page 379, 161 Cal. Rptr. 799 , neither the discretionary immunity of section 820.2 nor the more specific discretionary immunity of failure to enforce a statute (§§ 821, 818.2) immunized the City from the legal consequences of the officers' negligence in failing to remove the keys from the vehicle.

11987–1987
Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. Hall green
· 1983
2 sentences

1987Cf. Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. Hall, 104 Idaho 321 , 658 P.2d 992 (Ct.App.1983) (decision to grant or deny motion to set aside default judgment within discretion of trial court).

1987Cf. Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. Hall, 104 Idaho 321 , 658 P.2d 992 (Ct.App.1983) (decision to grant or deny motion to set aside default judgment within discretion of trial court).

11987–1987
Hogan v. Hermann green
idaho · 1980
2 sentences

1983Hogan v. Hermann, 101 Idaho 893 , 623 P.2d 900 (1980) (Bistline, J., concurring).

1983Hogan v. Hermann, 101 Idaho 893 , 623 P.2d 900 (1980) (Bistline, J., concurring).

11983–1983
State v. Gibbs green
idaho · 1972
2 sentences

1978Our object is not to rigidify the discretionary waiver decision; rather, it is to guide the sound exercise of that discretion in order to implement the legislative purpose and to protect the waiver process from constitutional infirmity. 94 Idaho at 916 n. 36, 500 P.2d at 217 n. 36.

1978Our object is not to rigidify the discretionary waiver decision; rather, it is to guide the sound exercise of that discretion in order to implement the legislative purpose and to protect the waiver process from constitutional infirmity. 94 Idaho at 916 n. 36, 500 P.2d at 217 n. 36.

11978–1978

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 6-903 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 6-904 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 12-121 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 18-4001 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 241 (1924–2026) CA 106 (1904–2026) OH 80 (1977–2026) IL 67 (1974–2025) TN 67 (1982–2026) WI 50 (1970–2026) IA 49 (2005–2026) OR 48 (1980–2025) MN 46 (1966–2026) LA 43 (1971–2023) NY 42 (1939–2025) IN 38 (1872–2025) AZ 36 (1957–2026) NJ 32 (1966–2026) CO 27 (1983–2026) WA 25 (1965–2026) ME 20 (1981–2018) MI 20 (1972–2025) AL 19 (1978–2025) VA 18 (2004–2025) ID 18 (1978–2020) TX 15 (1978–2025) SC 15 (1997–2020) NV 14 (1972–2018) WV 14 (1998–2024) FL 14 (1970–2019) KS 14 (1995–2025) GA 14 (1999–2022) MS 13 (1990–2024) MA 13 (1962–2025) UT 12 (1989–2026) CT 12 (1980–2018) MO 12 (1962–2019) NM 10 (1988–2019) MD 10 (1997–2016) WY 9 (2004–2024) DC 8 (1985–2025) VT 8 (1990–2021) NC 7 (1993–2017) AK 6 (1970–2025) HI 6 (1984–2012) SD 6 (1979–2010) ND 6 (1988–2018) RI 6 (1987–2008) OK 5 (1930–2016) NH 5 (1874–2009) MT 4 (1994–2023) DE 3 (1976–2026) NE 2 (1989–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check