43 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Juniorgreen2 sentences2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). 2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). | 8 | 8 |
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.green2 sentences2022First, it will not be applied to “supplant the Code of Civil Procedure provision which clearly permits a reconsideration of the overruling of peremptory exceptions.” Babineaux v. Pernie–Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1094 , 262 So.2d 328 , 332– 33; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., 2002–0822 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/23/02), 829 So.2d 661, 666 . 2022First, it will not be applied to “supplant the Code of Civil Procedure provision which clearly permits a reconsideration of the overruling of peremptory exceptions.” Babineaux v. Pernie–Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1094 , 262 So.2d 328 , 332– 33; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., 2002–0822 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/23/02), 829 So.2d 661, 666 . | 1 | 5 |
State v. Armsteadgreen1 sentence2012State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 28, 27 (La.App. 5th Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989); State v. Burciaga, 05 -357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06); 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 . | 1 | 1 |
Poole v. GUY HOPKINS CONST.green1 sentence2008Poole v. Guy Hopkins Construction, 07-0079 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/2/07) , 984 So.2d 43, 49, n. 1 ; Display South, Inc. v. Express Computer Supply, Inc., 06-1137 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/4/07) , 961 So.2d 451, 453, n. 3 . | 1 | 1 |
Display South v. Express Computer Supplygreen1 sentence2008Poole v. Guy Hopkins Construction, 07-0079 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/2/07) , 984 So.2d 43, 49, n. 1 ; Display South, Inc. v. Express Computer Supply, Inc., 06-1137 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/4/07) , 961 So.2d 451, 453, n. 3 . | 1 | 1 |
Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'ngreen1 sentence2006Thus, the compulsion that Douglas seeks by his mandamus lawsuit is not a "ministerial duty required by law." In Willis-Knighton Medical Center v. Caddo Shreveport Sales and Use Tax Com'n, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/1/05), 903 So.2d 1071, 1107 (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following criteria for determining whether a judicial decision should be accorded prospective effect only: (1) the decision to be applied nonretroactively must establish a new principle of law, either by overruling clear past precedent on which litigants have relied, or by deciding an issue of first impression | 1 | 1 |
| Coleman v. Orleans Parish School Bd.green | 1 | 1 |
| Valet v. City of Hammondgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Chaney v. National RR Passenger Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Burciaga
green
2 sentences2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). 2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). | 8 | 2012–2016 |
State v. Junior
green
2 sentences2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). 2016State v. Burciaga, 05-357 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06) , 924 So.2d 1125, 1128 ; State v. Junior, 542 So.2d 23, 27 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, 546 So.2d 1212 (La.1989). | 8 | 2006–2016 |
Landry v. Blaise, Inc.
green
2 sentences2022First, it will not be applied to “supplant the Code of Civil Procedure provision which clearly permits a reconsideration of the overruling of peremptory exceptions.” Babineaux v. Pernie–Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1094 , 262 So.2d 328 , 332– 33; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., 2002–0822 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/23/02), 829 So.2d 661, 666 . 2011First, it will not be applied to “supplant the Code of Civil Procedure provision which clearly permits a reconsideration of the overruling of peremptory exceptions.” Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 1094 , 262 So.2d 328, 332-33 [(1972)]; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., 2002-0822 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/23/02) , 829 So.2d 661, 666 . | 4 | 2004–2022 |
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2014Co., 98-2208 (La.9/8/99), 745 So.2d 1 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the discretionary immunity doctrine as follows: Generally, “Discretionary Immunity” under La.Rev.Stat. 9:2798.1 applies to specific fact situations which satisfy the rule enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988). 2008Co., 98-2208 (La.9/08/99), 745 So.2d 1 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the Discretionary Immunity doctrine as follows: Generally, `Discretionary Immunity' under La.Rev.Stat. 9:2798.1 applies to specific fact situations which satisfy the rule enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988). | 4 | 2001–2014 |
Berkovitz v. United States
green
2 sentences2014Co., 98-2208 (La.9/8/99), 745 So.2d 1 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the discretionary immunity doctrine as follows: Generally, “Discretionary Immunity” under La.Rev.Stat. 9:2798.1 applies to specific fact situations which satisfy the rule enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988). 2014Co., 98-2208 (La.9/8/99), 745 So.2d 1 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the discretionary immunity doctrine as follows: Generally, “Discretionary Immunity” under La.Rev.Stat. 9:2798.1 applies to specific fact situations which satisfy the rule enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988). | 4 | 2001–2014 |
Fowler v. Roberts
green
2 sentences2013Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So.2d 1 (La.1989). 1994Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So.2d at 15 . | 2 | 1994–2013 |
State v. Jacobs
green
2 sentences2008State v. Jacobs, 04-1219 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/05) , 904 So.2d 82, 88 , writ denied, 05-2072 (La.4/28/06), 927 So.2d 282 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 385 , 166 L.Ed.2d 276 (2006). 2008State v. Jacobs, 04-1219, p. 7 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/05), 904 So.2d 82, 88 , writ denied, 05-2072 (La.4/28/06), 927 So.2d 282 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Jacobs
green
2 sentences2008State v. Jacobs, 04-1219 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/05) , 904 So.2d 82, 88 , writ denied, 05-2072 (La.4/28/06), 927 So.2d 282 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 385 , 166 L.Ed.2d 276 (2006). 2008State v. Jacobs, 04-1219, p. 7 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/05), 904 So.2d 82, 88 , writ denied, 05-2072 (La.4/28/06), 927 So.2d 282 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Bradley
green
2 sentences2008Under the discretionary principle of law of the case, an appellate court will generally not reconsider prior rulings made in the same case on subsequent appeal. *881 State v. Greene, 06-667 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/30/07) , 951 So.2d 1226 , writ denied, 07-0546 (La.10/26/07), 966 So.2d 571 . 2008State v. Greene, 06-667, p. 11 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/30/07), 951 So.2d 1226, 1234 , unit denied, 07-0546 (La.10/26/07), 966 So. 2d 571 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Greene
green
2 sentences2008Under the discretionary principle of law of the case, an appellate court will generally not reconsider prior rulings made in the same case on subsequent appeal. *881 State v. Greene, 06-667 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/30/07) , 951 So.2d 1226 , writ denied, 07-0546 (La.10/26/07), 966 So.2d 571 . 2008State v. Greene, 06-667, p. 11 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/30/07), 951 So.2d 1226, 1234 , unit denied, 07-0546 (La.10/26/07), 966 So. 2d 571 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Mire v. EATELCORP., INC.
green
2 sentences2007Mire v. Eatelcorp, Inc. 2004-2603 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1113, 1117 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 549 . 2007Mire v. Eatelcorp, Inc., 2004-2603, p. 7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1113, 1117 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 549 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Ryder v. Belgard
neutral
2 sentences2007Mire v. Eatelcorp, Inc. 2004-2603 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1113, 1117 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 549 . 2007Mire v. Eatelcorp, Inc., 2004-2603, p. 7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1113, 1117 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 549 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Christian v. Fontenot
green
2 sentences2004Christian v. Fontenot, 672 So.2d at 444 . 1996Christian v. Fontenot, 672 So.2d at 444 . | 2 | 1996–2004 |
State v. Allen
neutral
1 sentence2023State v. Allen, 17-685 (La. 23-KA-60 36 App. 5 Cir. 5/16/18), 247 So.3d 179, 185 , writ denied, 18-1042 (La. 11/15/18), 255 So.3d 998 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Allen
green
1 sentence2023State v. Allen, 17-685 (La. 23-KA-60 36 App. 5 Cir. 5/16/18), 247 So.3d 179, 185 , writ denied, 18-1042 (La. 11/15/18), 255 So.3d 998 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Falcon
neutral
1 sentence2020Falcon, 13-849, 138 So.3d at 87 -88 (citing State v. Pettus, 11-862 (La. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Quang T. Do
green
1 sentence2016State v. Do, 13-290 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/19/13) , 130 So.3d 377, 388 . .Under the discretionary principle of “law of the case,” an appellate court will generally refuse to reconsider its own rulings of law on a subsequent appeal in the same case. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans
green
1 sentence2016Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979 (La.04/04/06), 925 So.2d 1202, 1207 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Land v. Vidrine
green
1 sentence2014The "law of the case” doctrine is a discretionary doctrine by which "courts of appeal generally refuse to reconsider their own rulings of law on a subsequent appeal in the same case.” Land, 62 So.3d at 42 . . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2010East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Wilson, 2008-0536, p. 9 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/6/08), 992 So.2d 537, 543 , writ denied, 2008-1479 (La.12/12/08), 997 So.2d 560 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2010East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Wilson, 2008-0536, p. 9 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/6/08), 992 So.2d 537, 543 , writ denied, 2008-1479 (La.12/12/08), 997 So.2d 560 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Guccione
neutral
1 sentence2005State v. Guccione, 96-1049 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/29/97) , 694 So.2d 1060, 1066 , writ denied, 97-2151 (La.3/13/98), 712 So.2d 869 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Guccione
neutral
1 sentence2005State v. Guccione, 96-1049 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/29/97) , 694 So.2d 1060, 1066 , writ denied, 97-2151 (La.3/13/98), 712 So.2d 869 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
HR 10 PROFIT SHARING PLAN ACCOUNT NO. 2656-3314 v. Mayeux
neutral
1 sentence2005Id., citing Avenue Plaza, L.L.C. v. Falgoust, 96-0173, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), 676 So.2d 1077, 1079 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Avenue Plaza, LLC v. Falgoust green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Williams v. City of Monroe green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Willett v. Premier Bank green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Thibodeau v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Thibodeau v. Mayor & Councilmen of Morgan City green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Hawkins v. STATE, DHHR green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Pelloat v. State ex rel. Department of Highways neutral | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.