10 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1997–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gordon v. Gordongreen2 sentences2016Gordon v. Gordon, 174 Md.App. 583, 625-26 , 923 A.2d 149 (2007). 2016Gordon v. Gordon, 174 Md.App. 583, 625-26 , 923 A.2d 149 (2007). | 1 | 2 |
cluster 440502green1 sentence2007Compare Daniels v. Woodbury County, 742 F.2d 1128, 1132 (8th Cir.1984) (mandatory language in general relief statute created a “legitimate claim of entitlement and expectancy of benefits in persons who claim to meet the eligibility requirements”) (citations and internal quotations omitted); Griffeth v. Detrich, 603 F.2d 118, 121 (9th Cir.1979) (state code using mandatory language requiring localities to provide general relief, combined with county regulations providing detailed, objective eligibility criteria, restrict the discretion of intake eligibility workers and create legitimate expectat | 1 | 1 |
Guerra v. Scruggsgreen1 sentence2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 1 |
Gardner v. City Of Baltimoregreen1 sentence2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Ashcroftgreen1 sentence2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 1 |
Griffeth v. Detrichgreen1 sentence2007Compare Daniels v. Woodbury County, 742 F.2d 1128, 1132 (8th Cir.1984) (mandatory language in general relief statute created a “legitimate claim of entitlement and expectancy of benefits in persons who claim to meet the eligibility requirements”) (citations and internal quotations omitted); Griffeth v. Detrich, 603 F.2d 118, 121 (9th Cir.1979) (state code using mandatory language requiring localities to provide general relief, combined with county regulations providing detailed, objective eligibility criteria, restrict the discretion of intake eligibility workers and create legitimate expectat | 1 | 1 |
Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. University of Marylandgreen2 sentences2007See Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. University of Maryland , 382 Md. 151 , 854 A.2d 1220 (2004). 2007See Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. University of Maryland , 382 Md. 151 , 854 A.2d 1220 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gallagher v. Gallagher
green
2 sentences2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). 2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). | 2 | 2000–2007 |
Alston v. Alston
green
2 sentences2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). 2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). | 2 | 2000–2007 |
Colter v. State
green
1 sentence2012Appellant insists that the trial court ran afoul of the Court of Appeals’s decisions in Taliaferro v. State, 295 Md. 376 , 456 A.2d 29 (1983), and Colter v. State, 297 Md. 423 , 466 A.2d 1286 (1983), by applying a “hard and fast” rule and failing to consider any alternatives to the strict preclusion of the testimony at issue or address any of the discretionary factors set forth in Taliaferro . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
In Re Application of George B.
green
1 sentence2012Appellant insists that the trial court ran afoul of the Court of Appeals’s decisions in Taliaferro v. State, 295 Md. 376 , 456 A.2d 29 (1983), and Colter v. State, 297 Md. 423 , 466 A.2d 1286 (1983), by applying a “hard and fast” rule and failing to consider any alternatives to the strict preclusion of the testimony at issue or address any of the discretionary factors set forth in Taliaferro . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Taliaferro v. State
green
2 sentences2012Appellant insists that the trial court ran afoul of the Court of Appeals’s decisions in Taliaferro v. State, 295 Md. 376 , 456 A.2d 29 (1983), and Colter v. State, 297 Md. 423 , 466 A.2d 1286 (1983), by applying a “hard and fast” rule and failing to consider any alternatives to the strict preclusion of the testimony at issue or address any of the discretionary factors set forth in Taliaferro . 2012Appellant insists that the trial court ran afoul of the Court of Appeals’s decisions in Taliaferro v. State, 295 Md. 376 , 456 A.2d 29 (1983), and Colter v. State, 297 Md. 423 , 466 A.2d 1286 (1983), by applying a “hard and fast” rule and failing to consider any alternatives to the strict preclusion of the testimony at issue or address any of the discretionary factors set forth in Taliaferro . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Long v. Long
green
2 sentences2008For instance, in Long, supra, 129 Md.App. 554 , 743 A.2d 281 , although we could not “fault the chancellor’s thorough treatment of the statutory factors,” we vacated an award of “less than 20 percent of the marital assets to Wife,” where the trial court’s analysis of the factors tipped in favor of the wife in several respects. 2008For instance, in Long, supra, 129 Md.App. 554 , 743 A.2d 281 , although we could not “fault the chancellor’s thorough treatment of the statutory factors,” we vacated an award of “less than 20 percent of the marital assets to Wife,” where the trial court’s analysis of the factors tipped in favor of the wife in several respects. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Zakki v. Department of Health & Human Services
green
1 sentence2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Appiah v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
green
2 sentences2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe 2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Malin v. Mininberg
green
2 sentences2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). 2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Samuel Appiah v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
green
1 sentence2007See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 431 (4th Cir.2002) (holding appellant had “no liberty or property interest in a discretionary waiver of deportability”); Appiah v. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that because suspension of deportation is discretionary, it does not create a liberty or property interest protected by the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000); Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and City Council, 969 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1992) (plaintiff had no legitimate claim of entitlement to issuance of a public works agreement whe | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Chimes v. Michael
green
2 sentences2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). 2007Alston, 331 Md. at 504 , 629 A.2d 70 ; Malin v. Mininberg, 153 Md.App. 358, 430 , 837 A.2d 178 (2003); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 282-83 , 748 A.2d 1065 (2000); Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997), cert. denied, 349 Md. 495 , 709 A.2d 139 (1998). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Fields v. Mersack
green
2 sentences2006We are persuaded that the discretionary rule is the better ruis. 83 Md.App. at 658, 577 A.2d 376 (emphasis supplied). 2006We are persuaded that the discretionary rule is the better ruis. 83 Md.App. at 658, 577 A.2d 376 (emphasis supplied). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Doser v. Doser
green
2 sentences2000Alston v. Alston, 331 Md. 496, 504 , 629 A.2d 70 (1993); Ware, 131 Md.App. at 214 , 748 A.2d 1031 ; Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997); Doser, 106 Md.App. at 350 , 664 A.2d 453 . 2000Alston v. Alston, 331 Md. 496, 504 , 629 A.2d 70 (1993); Ware, 131 Md.App. at 214 , 748 A.2d 1031 ; Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997); Doser, 106 Md.App. at 350 , 664 A.2d 453 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Ware v. Ware
green
2 sentences2000Alston v. Alston, 331 Md. 496, 504 , 629 A.2d 70 (1993); Ware, 131 Md.App. at 214 , 748 A.2d 1031 ; Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997); Doser, 106 Md.App. at 350 , 664 A.2d 453 . 2000Alston v. Alston, 331 Md. 496, 504 , 629 A.2d 70 (1993); Ware, 131 Md.App. at 214 , 748 A.2d 1031 ; Gallagher v. Gallagher, 118 Md.App. 567, 576 , 703 A.2d 850 (1997); Doser, 106 Md.App. at 350 , 664 A.2d 453 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Bowers v. State
green
1 sentence1997Bowers, supra at 135 , 507 A.2d at 1079 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.