parole violation (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

parole violation in Georgia

12 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Morrissey v. Brewergreen
scotus · 1972 · cited in 6 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1975–2024
2 sentences

2024In support of his argument that the delay in this case violated his rights, Murphy relies on Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471 ( 92 SCt 2593 , 33 LE2d 484) (1972), in which the Supreme Court found, in the context of a parole violation, that “due process would seem to require that some minimal inquiry be conducted . . . as 14 promptly as convenient after arrest while information is fresh and sources are available.” Id. at 485 (III) (a).

2024In support of his argument that the delay in this case violated his rights, Murphy relies on Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471 ( 92 SCt 2593 , 33 LE2d 484) (1972), in which the Supreme Court found, in the context of a parole violation, that “due process would seem to require that some minimal inquiry be conducted . . . as 14 promptly as convenient after arrest while information is fresh and sources are available.” Id. at 485 (III) (a).

36
Smith v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1980 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007See Smith v. State, 154 Ga. App. at 609 .

11
State v. Roccogreen
gactapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004State v. Rocco, 255 Ga. App. 565, 566 ( 566 SE2d 365 ) (2002).

2004State v. Rocco, 255 Ga. App. 565, 566 ( 566 SE2d 365 ) (2002).

11
Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scottgreen
scotus · 1998 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001The costs of allowing a parolee to avoid the consequences of his violation are compounded by the fact that parolees (particularly those who have already committed parole violations) are more likely to commit future criminal offenses than are average citizens. [Cit.] Indeed, this is the very premise behind the system of close parole supervision. [Cit.] Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U. S. 357, 365 (II) (118 SC 2014, 141 LE2d 344) (1998) (holding that parole boards do not have to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment).

11
Battles v. Stategreen
ga · 1992 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Battles v. State, 262 Ga. 415, 417 (5) ( 420 SE2d 303 ) (1992). 5. (a) Jackson enumerates as error the admission of his in-custody statement, contending that it was the product of an illegal pretextual arrest for a parole violation.

1996Battles v. State, 262 Ga. 415, 417 (5) ( 420 SE2d 303 ) (1992). 5. (a) Jackson enumerates as error the admission of his in-custody statement, contending that it was the product of an illegal pretextual arrest for a parole violation.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
The State v. Mercier. green
gactapp · 2019
2 sentences

2026Incident to his arrest for that crime, the 3 White’s reliance on State v. Mercier, 349 Ga. App. 536 ( 826 SE2d 422 ) (2019) (physical precedent only), is unpersuasive as that case is distinguishable.

2026Incident to his arrest for that crime, the 3 White’s reliance on State v. Mercier, 349 Ga. App. 536 ( 826 SE2d 422 ) (2019) (physical precedent only), is unpersuasive as that case is distinguishable.

12026–2026
Elrod v. State green
gactapp · 1996
1 sentence

1999The amount of time defense counsel spent with Grant “is not determinative of whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Id. at 708 .

11999–1999
Ortiz v. State green
ga · 1996
2 sentences

1996See Whren v. United States, U. S. _ (116 SC 1769, 135 LE2d 89) (64 U. S. Law Week 4409) *132 (1996); Ortiz v. State, 266 Ga. 752 (1) ( 470 SE2d 874 ) (1996). (b) Jackson also contends that his statement should have been suppressed because of its lack of voluntariness.

1996See Whren v. United States, U. S. _ (116 SC 1769, 135 LE2d 89) (64 U. S. Law Week 4409) *132 (1996); Ortiz v. State, 266 Ga. 752 (1) ( 470 SE2d 874 ) (1996). (b) Jackson also contends that his statement should have been suppressed because of its lack of voluntariness.

11996–1996
Ledesma v. State green
ga · 1983
2 sentences

1988See, e.g., OCGA § 42-9-42(e); 42-9-44. “[I]f probable cause to arrest exists [as it did in this case], a warrantless arrest is lawful.” Ledesma v. State, 251 Ga. 487 (3) ( 306 SE2d 629 ).

1988See, e.g., OCGA § 42-9-42(e); 42-9-44. “[I]f probable cause to arrest exists [as it did in this case], a warrantless arrest is lawful.” Ledesma v. State, 251 Ga. 487 (3) ( 306 SE2d 629 ).

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

CA 380 (1964–2026) PA 321 (1953–2026) NY 314 (1963–2025) TX 162 (1981–2026) OH 105 (1977–2026) IL 59 (1974–2025) NJ 54 (1962–2026) OR 50 (1974–2026) MI 49 (1957–2024) WA 33 (1969–2024) CO 32 (1975–2025) FL 30 (1969–2019) CT 30 (1989–2020) UT 28 (1983–2025) ID 26 (1971–2025) MA 26 (1969–2024) WI 26 (1974–2025) MO 26 (1974–2025) NV 24 (1974–2021) KS 24 (1978–2024) NM 23 (1972–2023) AL 22 (1965–2015) IN 22 (1978–2026) MD 22 (1975–2025) LA 20 (1976–2025) IA 19 (1968–2025) TN 19 (1989–2026) MS 18 (1990–2018) AZ 17 (1973–2021) AK 17 (1974–2026) SC 15 (1950–2023) GA 12 (1975–2026) WY 12 (1975–2018) KY 11 (1964–2026) MT 10 (1961–2021) AR 9 (1999–2022) DC 9 (1981–2025) WV 8 (1986–2021) HI 8 (1994–2008) OK 7 (1915–1999) VA 7 (1968–2015) VT 7 (1985–2025) NH 6 (2009–2021) NE 6 (1992–2023) SD 5 (1979–2024) ME 4 (1975–2010) MN 4 (1982–2007) DE 4 (1984–2022) RI 4 (1978–2018) NC 3 (2009–2017) ND 3 (1951–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check