11 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1964–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bradley v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Love, 334 S.W.3d 92, 93 (Ky. 2011) (issues of statutory interpretation reviewed de novo); Bradley v. Commonwealth, 327 S.W.3d 512, 516 (Ky. 2010) (application of law to facts reviewed de novo). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lovegreen1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Love, 334 S.W.3d 92, 93 (Ky. 2011) (issues of statutory interpretation reviewed de novo); Bradley v. Commonwealth, 327 S.W.3d 512, 516 (Ky. 2010) (application of law to facts reviewed de novo). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Whitmoregreen1 sentence2006The method used is condemned, but we find no reason that this technical defect should have the effect of vacating the original judgment of conviction.” The court noted that the parolee was returned to prison under the parole officer’s parole violation warrant two days after his arrest; that he was in prison on the underlying robbery charge; and that he received a parole revocation hearing, but he was held for two days without proper authority.). 10 . 92 S.W.3d 76, 79 (Ky.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Ingramgreen2 sentences2004In Commonwealth v. Ingram, Ky., 46 S.W.3d 569, 571 (2001), the Kentucky Supreme Court held that “[a] properly functioning video arraignment system is the equivalent of in-court arraignment.” The court also noted that “[tjhe trend among state and federal courts is to allow the properly safeguarded use of video proceedings, provided there is no violation of some specific constitutional right.” 5 Id. at 572 . 2004In Commonwealth v. Ingram, Ky., 46 S.W.3d 569, 571 (2001), the Kentucky Supreme Court held that “[a] properly functioning video arraignment system is the equivalent of in-court arraignment.” The court also noted that “[tjhe trend among state and federal courts is to allow the properly safeguarded use of video proceedings, provided there is no violation of some specific constitutional right.” 5 Id. at 572 . | 1 | 1 |
Carchman v. Nashgreen2 sentences1990See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3409 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985); Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 278 n. 7, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). 1990See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3409 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985); Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 278 n. 7, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewer
green
2 sentences2026During the initial hearing, “the parolee should be given notice that the hearing will take place and that its purpose is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe he has committed a parole violation.” Id. at 486-87 . 1990Once a parolee is arrested on a parole violation warrant, he is entitled to a probable cause hearing concerning the acts he is alleged to have committed. 92 S.Ct. at 2602 . | 2 | 1990–2026 |
Davis v. Harris
green
2 sentences1967Thus it is that when he is held pursuant to a warrant issued under KRS 439.430(1) he is in custody “by virtue of his sentence.” It was suggested in Davis v. Harris, Ky., 355 S.W.2d 147 (1962), that KRS 440.330 provides the only procedure under which a prisoner convicted in this state may be released conditionally for trial in another jurisdiction and that, given a liberal construction, the statute is broad enough to encompass a transfer on request of the Attorney General of the United States or his duly authorized representative. 1964It is contended that under our cases of Jones v. Rayborn, Ky., 346 S.W.2d 743 ; Davis v. Harris, Ky., 355 S.W.2d 147 ; and Thomas v. Schumaker, Ky., 360 S.W.2d 215 , Kentucky had waived or forfeited its jurisdiction to reconfine appellant. | 2 | 1964–1967 |
Sampson v. United States
green
1 sentence2023Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Moody v. Daggett
green
2 sentences1990See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3409 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985); Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 278 n. 7, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). 1990See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3409 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985); Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 278 n. 7, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Balsley v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1971He relies on Balsley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 428 S.W.2d 614 (1967), in which the prisoner was being held by Kentucky as a parole violator and was released to federal officers without statutory authorization. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Wombles v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1969Wombles v. Commonwealth, Ky., 317 S.W.2d 169 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Baker v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1966Our decision in Baker v. Commonwealth, Ky., 378 S.W.2d 616 , is dispositive of this case. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Jones v. Rayborn
green
1 sentence1964It is contended that under our cases of Jones v. Rayborn, Ky., 346 S.W.2d 743 ; Davis v. Harris, Ky., 355 S.W.2d 147 ; and Thomas v. Schumaker, Ky., 360 S.W.2d 215 , Kentucky had waived or forfeited its jurisdiction to reconfine appellant. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Prather v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1964Prather v. Commonwealth, Ky., 368 S.W.2d 175 . *617 Assuming that if he had been in custody of the parole authorities under the parole violation warrant this would have been by virtue of his sentence, at the time of his release he was not in such custody. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Thomas v. Schumaker
red
1 sentence1964It is contended that under our cases of Jones v. Rayborn, Ky., 346 S.W.2d 743 ; Davis v. Harris, Ky., 355 S.W.2d 147 ; and Thomas v. Schumaker, Ky., 360 S.W.2d 215 , Kentucky had waived or forfeited its jurisdiction to reconfine appellant. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.