Smith motion in Alaska

9 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (14)

Case	Followed	Cited
Carlson v. Renkesgreen alaska · 2005 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012App. P. 210(i). 30 113 P.3d 638, 640, 642-43 (Alaska 2005). 31 Alaska R. 2012He also evaluated Smith’s claim that 22 AAC 05.470 was invalid on its merits, rather than dismissing it for not having been preserved at the disciplinary hearing. 28 Id. 29 Alaska R.	1	1
Brandon v. State, Department of Correctionsgreen alaska · 2003 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012But if there was a due process violation, it was cured because as of the proceedings in superior court Smith had notice of the amount he was required to pay, he was given the opportunity to challenge it in the superior court, and the amount exceeded the amount that was seized in his account. 3 Interior Alaska Airboat Ass’n, Inc. v. State, Bd. of Game, 18 P.3d 686, 689 (Alaska 2001). 4 AS 33.30.295(b)(1); Brandon v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 73 P.3d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 2003). 5 Brandon, 73 P.3d at 1233 . -5- 1431 provisions conferring rule-making authority on the agency’ and whether it is ‘reasonab 2012But if there was a due process violation, it was cured because as of the proceedings in superior court Smith had notice of the amount he was required to pay, he was given the opportunity to challenge it in the superior court, and the amount exceeded the amount that was seized in his account. 3 Interior Alaska Airboat Ass’n, Inc. v. State, Bd. of Game, 18 P.3d 686, 689 (Alaska 2001). 4 AS 33.30.295(b)(1); Brandon v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 73 P.3d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 2003). 5 Brandon, 73 P.3d at 1233 . -5- 1431 provisions conferring rule-making authority on the agency’ and whether it is ‘reasonab	1	1
Interior Alaska Airboat Ass'n v. Stategreen alaska · 2001 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012But if there was a due process violation, it was cured because as of the proceedings in superior court Smith had notice of the amount he was required to pay, he was given the opportunity to challenge it in the superior court, and the amount exceeded the amount that was seized in his account. 3 Interior Alaska Airboat Ass’n, Inc. v. State, Bd. of Game, 18 P.3d 686, 689 (Alaska 2001). 4 AS 33.30.295(b)(1); Brandon v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 73 P.3d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 2003). 5 Brandon, 73 P.3d at 1233 . -5- 1431 provisions conferring rule-making authority on the agency’ and whether it is ‘reasonab	1	1
Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural Resourcesgreen alaska · 1996 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 1 sentence 2011CONCLUSION We REVERSE the order offsetting Smith’s claim against Hora’s recovery, and REMAND for calculation of Hora’s claim without offset. 6 Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res., 921 P.2d 1134, 1142 (Alaska 1996) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). 7 Because we hold that res judicata applies and reverse Smith’s entire reimbursement award, we need not reach Hora’s argument that the trial court erred by double-counting a $370 award to Smith. -7- 1401	1	1
cluster 769722green ca9 · 2000 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 1 sentence 2004Cf. Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm'n, 220 F.3d 1134, 1150-51 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (Kleinfeld, J., dissenting) (describing the landlords' federal "hybrid" rights claim as raising "a serious question" falling "somewhere in between"" two hypothetical cases in which the results of the Smith test would seem clear). 40 .	1	1
State v. Prestongreen me · 1980 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
Hunter v. Stategreen alaska · 1979 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See Hunter v. State, 590 P.2d 888, 894-95 (Alaska 1979). . - Judge Cranston denied Smith's motion to suppress, which suggests that Judge Cranston would not have found that Smith thought he was locked in the police car. . 2 Wayne R. 2002Would a reasonable innocent person believe that, if he falsely confessed to a crime, the police would not arrest him and he would be free to leave? [39] See Hunter v. State, 590 P.2d 888, 894-95 (Alaska 1979). [40] Judge Cranston denied Smith's motion to suppress, which suggests that Judge Cranston would not have found that Smith thought he was locked in the police car. [41] 2 Wayne R.	1	1
Miranda v. Arizonagreen scotus · 1966 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
Long v. Stategreen alaskactapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
State v. Travisgreen or · 1968 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
State v. Gardgreen minnctapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
In Re NERgreen illappct · 1987 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	1
Department of Transportation v. Grawegreen illappct · 1983 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990Mar-chant agreed not to appeal the finding of liability, and paid less than Smith’s total claim. 3 Board approval of the settlement “constitutes a decision of the [Board] and is the equivalent of an award by the [Board].” See Department of Transportation v. Grawe, 113 Ill.App.3d 336 , 69 Ill.Dec. 250 , 447 N.E.2d 467, 472 (1983); see also, 3 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 82.60 at 15-1225-27 (1983). 1990Mar-chant agreed not to appeal the finding of liability, and paid less than Smith’s total claim. 3 Board approval of the settlement “constitutes a decision of the [Board] and is the equivalent of an award by the [Board].” See Department of Transportation v. Grawe, 113 Ill.App.3d 336 , 69 Ill.Dec. 250 , 447 N.E.2d 467, 472 (1983); see also, 3 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 82.60 at 15-1225-27 (1983).	1	1
State v. Graybillgreen alaska · 1985 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987State v. Graybill, 695 P.2d 725, 729-30 (Alaska 1985). 7 . 1987State v. Graybill, 695 P.2d 725, 729-30 (Alaska 1985). 7 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
Alvarado v. State green alaska · 1971 2 sentences 2021In particular, we rejected Smith’s claim that the selection of his jury venire violated the rule established by the Alaska Supreme Court in Alvarado v. State, 486 P.2d 891 (Alaska 1971) — the constitutional requirement that the group of people summoned for prospective jury service in a criminal case must reflect the community where the crime is alleged to have occurred. 2021In our first decision in this case, Smith v. State, 440 P.3d 355 (Alaska App. 2019), we rejected Smith’s claim that the jury pool in his case violated Alvarado v. State, 486 P.2d 891 (Alaska 1971).	1	2021–2021
Smith v. State green alaskactapp · 2019 2 sentences 2021In our first decision in this case, Smith v. State, 440 P.3d 355 (Alaska App. 2019), we rejected Smith’s claim that the jury pool in his case violated Alvarado v. State, 486 P.2d 891 (Alaska 1971). 2021Smith I, 440 P.3d at 363-64 .	1	2021–2021
Aspen Exploration Corp. v. Sheffield green alaska · 1987 1 sentence 2008Aspen Exploration Corp., 739 P.2d at 158-59 . 30 .	1	2008–2008
Tagala v. State green alaskactapp · 1991 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
Beckwith v. United States green scotus · 1976 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
State v. Murray green alaskactapp · 1990 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
Motta v. State green alaskactapp · 1996 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
People v. N.E.R. green illappct · 1987 1 sentence 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
Berkemer v. McCarty green scotus · 1984 2 sentences 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See 2002LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.6(f), at 540 (2d ed.1999). [42] See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 . [43] See State v. Murray, 796 P.2d 849 , 851-52 n. 1 (Alaska App.1990); Hunter, 590 P.2d at 893 . [44] Hunter, 590 P.2d at 895 n. 23. [45] Id. at 895 . [46] 812 P.2d 604 (Alaska App.1991). [47] 796 P.2d 849 (Alaska App.1990). [48] 911 P.2d 34 (Alaska App.1996). [49] See Tagala, 812 P.2d at 609 . [50] See id. at 606-07 . [51] See Murray, 796 P.2d at 850-51 . [52] Id. at 850 . [53] See Motta, 911 P.2d at 39 . [54] See	1	2002–2002
Frank v. State green alaska · 1979 2 sentences 1994We will apply Frank v. State, 604 P.2d 1068 (Alaska 1979), to determine whether the anti-discrimination laws violate Swanner's right to free exercise under the Alaska Constitution. [10] In Frank v. State , we adopted the Sherbert test to determine whether the Free Exercise Clause of the Alaska Constitution requires an exemption to a facially neutral law. [11] 604 P.2d at 1070 . 1994We will apply Frank v. State, 604 P.2d 1068 (Alaska 1979), to determine whether the anti-discrimination laws violate Swanner's right to free exercise under the Alaska Constitution. [10] In Frank v. State , we adopted the Sherbert test to determine whether the Free Exercise Clause of the Alaska Constitution requires an exemption to a facially neutral law. [11] 604 P.2d at 1070 .	1	1994–1994

Where else courts name it

TX 126 (1934–2026) GA 108 (1969–2026) CA 96 (1895–2026) OH 92 (1968–2026) PA 79 (1899–2026) FL 66 (1966–2026) IL 65 (1976–2025) MS 59 (1980–2025) IN 59 (1972–2024) WA 53 (1971–2025) MI 40 (1972–2025) AL 38 (1986–2024) NY 34 (1906–2024) MO 28 (1977–2024) IA 25 (1992–2025) MD 25 (1965–2023) DC 25 (1983–2024) ID 24 (1972–2026) WI 23 (1958–2025) KS 23 (1928–2026) UT 23 (1988–2026) LA 22 (1972–2026) AZ 22 (1988–2020) AR 21 (1995–2026) SC 21 (1992–2026) DE 19 (1997–2026) NC 16 (1976–2019) VA 16 (1984–2025) MT 14 (1981–2026) TN 14 (2002–2025) KY 14 (1951–2025) CT 12 (1986–2019) ME 11 (1983–2024) MN 11 (1984–2026) MA 10 (1973–2026) CO 10 (1985–2025) OK 9 (1982–2014) NJ 9 (1955–2022) OR 9 (1926–2023) AK 9 (1987–2021) NM 8 (1938–2020) NE 8 (1985–2023) NV 7 (1964–2014) WY 6 (1996–2021) WV 6 (2004–2020) VT 6 (1989–2020) SD 5 (1994–2014) HI 5 (2002–2020) VI 4 (2009–2017) RI 3 (1975–2021) ND 2 (1990–2008) NH 2 (1994–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check