noted rule in Pennsylvania

2018Estate of Cangemi v. Cone, 774 A.2d 1262 , 1265 (Pa. Super. 2001)).

2018Estate of Cangemi v. Cone , 774 A.2d 1262 , 1265 (Pa. Super. 2001) ).

2018Id. at 364 (citing Criswell , 834 A.2d at 512 ).

2018Id. at 364 (citing Criswell , 834 A.2d at 512 ).

2018Further, the court noted a claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence warrants a new trial only "where the verdict is so contrary to the evidence it shocks one's sense of justice." Id. (quoting Cangemi ex rel.

2018Further, the court noted a claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence warrants a new trial only "where the verdict is so contrary to the evidence it shocks one's sense of justice." Id. (quoting Cangemi ex rel.

2025The Court noted that this test involves consideration of factors such as the duration and conditions attendant to the interview, and the attitude of the interviewer, as well as any other factors “that could drain a person’s ability to withstand coercion.” Id. at *5 (citing Roberts, 969 A.2d at 599 ).

2025The Court noted that this test involves consideration of factors such as the duration and conditions attendant to the interview, and the attitude of the interviewer, as well as any other factors “that could drain a person’s ability to withstand coercion.” Id. at *5 (citing Roberts, 969 A.2d at 599 ).

2025M & D Auto Body, 599 A.2d at 1019 .

2025Id.

2024Id. at 14 (citing Commonwealth v. Kriegler, 127 A.3d 840 (Pa.Super. 2015)).

2021Id.

2021Discussing the evolution of case law with regard to application of the compulsory joinder rule, the Court noted that the rule was mandated under the Court’s “supervisory powers,” id. 247 A.3d at 983, that the statutory scheme of compulsory joinder was derived from principles of the Model Penal Code, id., and that the Justices’ “intent was generally to require summary and greater offenses arising out of single criminal episodes to be consolidated in the common pleas courts.” Id. at 984.

2020First Trial Court Decision The trial court noted that analysis of whether a particular zoning ordinance creates a de facto prohibition on a particular use is guided by the two-part test established by our Supreme Court in Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing Board of Exeter Township, 962 A.2d 653 (Pa. 2009).11 R.R. at 602a.

2018Id.

2018Stafford, 933 A.2d at 143 n.7.

2017There, the Court noted that the doctrine of unclean hands “is derived from the unwillingness of a court to give relief to a suitor who has so conducted himself as to shock the moral sensibilities of the judge, and it has nothing to do with the rights or liabilities of the parties.” Id.

2017The doctrine’s applicability is limited, however, and “does not bar relief to a party merely because his conduct in general has been shown not to be blameless; the doctrine only applies where the wrongdoing directly affects the relationship subsisting between the parties and is directly connected with the matter in controversy.” Id.

2017Co., 83 A.3d 418 (Pa.Super. 2013) (quoting Reardon v. Allegheny College, 926 A.2d 477, 486 (Pa.Super. 2007), this Court noted that the doctrine forecloses tort claims “(1) arising solely from the contractual relationship between the parties; (2) when the alleged duties breached were grounded in the contract itself; (3) where any liability stems from the contract; and (4) when the tort claim essentially duplicates the breach of contract claim or where the success of the tort claim is dependent on the success of the breach of contract claim.” - 24 - J-A14016-17 causing water to leak into homes a

2017While the teenage victims’ recollections of the abuse were “not perfect,” it “found their testimony credible and persuasive.” Id.

2016Citing this Court’s decision in Dixon v, Fuller, 196 Pa. 349 , 46 A. 553 (1900), and its own decision in Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 221 Pa.Super. 65 , 289 A.2d 229 (1972), the court noted that the doctrine of estoppel by deed is well established in this Commonwealth, and concluded that, pursuant thereto, “[Appellants] are barred from denying that the Lease covers all 62 acres of the leased premises.” Shedden, 88 A.3d at 233 .

2016Citing this Court’s decision in Dixon v, Fuller, 196 Pa. 349 , 46 A. 553 (1900), and its own decision in Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 221 Pa.Super. 65 , 289 A.2d 229 (1972), the court noted that the doctrine of estoppel by deed is well established in this Commonwealth, and concluded that, pursuant thereto, “[Appellants] are barred from denying that the Lease covers all 62 acres of the leased premises.” Shedden, 88 A.3d at 233 .

2016Citing this Court’s decision in Dixon v, Fuller, 196 Pa. 349 , 46 A. 553 (1900), and its own decision in Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 221 Pa.Super. 65 , 289 A.2d 229 (1972), the court noted that the doctrine of estoppel by deed is well established in this Commonwealth, and concluded that, pursuant thereto, “[Appellants] are barred from denying that the Lease covers all 62 acres of the leased premises.” Shedden, 88 A.3d at 233 .

2016Citing this Court’s decision in Dixon v, Fuller, 196 Pa. 349 , 46 A. 553 (1900), and its own decision in Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 221 Pa.Super. 65 , 289 A.2d 229 (1972), the court noted that the doctrine of estoppel by deed is well established in this Commonwealth, and concluded that, pursuant thereto, “[Appellants] are barred from denying that the Lease covers all 62 acres of the leased premises.” Shedden, 88 A.3d at 233 .

2016Id.

2016Citing this Court’s decision in Dixon v, Fuller, 196 Pa. 349 , 46 A. 553 (1900), and its own decision in Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 221 Pa.Super. 65 , 289 A.2d 229 (1972), the court noted that the doctrine of estoppel by deed is well established in this Commonwealth, and concluded that, pursuant thereto, “[Appellants] are barred from denying that the Lease covers all 62 acres of the leased premises.” Shedden, 88 A.3d at 233 .

2015Nevertheless, our High Court determined that there was “too much potential for abuse in a rule which permits a plaintiff to keep an action alive without proper notice to a defendant merely by filing a praecipe for a writ of summons and then having the writ reissued in a timely fashion without attempting to effectuate service.” Id. at 888 .

2014While these distinctions are accurate, these cases, along with several others, nevertheless are instructive on how to resolve the present matter....In [Campbell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Foamex), 707 A.2d 1188 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998) ] and [Beattie v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.), 713 A.2d 187 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998) ], reinstatement cases, the claimants involuntarily left their modified duty positions and, in considering whether reinstatement of the benefits was proper under Section 413 of the Act, this Court again examined the reasons behind the claimants’

2014Moreover, the Court noted that the exception is narrow, and generally limited to dangers posed by the arrestee himself, and that outside threats do not “lurk in all custodial arrests.” Id. (citing United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 14-15 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977)).

2014Moreover, the Court noted that the exception is narrow, and generally limited to dangers posed by the arrestee himself, and that outside threats do not “lurk in all custodial arrests.” Id. (citing United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 14-15 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977)).

2014While these distinctions are accurate, these cases, along with several others, nevertheless are instructive on how to resolve the present matter....In [Campbell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Foamex), 707 A.2d 1188 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998) ] and [Beattie v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.), 713 A.2d 187 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998) ], reinstatement cases, the claimants involuntarily left their modified duty positions and, in considering whether reinstatement of the benefits was proper under Section 413 of the Act, this Court again examined the reasons behind the claimants’