8 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCEgreen2 sentences1985More than twenty years ago this Court noted that the doctrine had come under fire as being "archaic and outmoded." McKenzie v. City of Florence , 234 S.C. 428, 435 , 108 S.E. (2d) 825, 828 (1959). 1985More than twenty years ago this Court noted that the doctrine had come under fire .as being “archaic and outmoded.” McKenzie v. City of Florence, 234 S. C. 428, 435, 108 S. E. (2d) 825, 828 (1959). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Martingreen2 sentences1999In Fradella v. Town of Mount Pleasant, 325 S.C. 469 , 482 S.E.2d 53 (Ct.App.1997), this Court explained: South Carolina Code Ann. § 17-13-30 (1985), states that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs “may arrest without warrant any and all persons who, within [the officers’] view, violate any of the criminal laws ... if such arrest be made at the time of such violation of law or immediately thereafter.” However, in State v. Martin, 275 S.C. 141 , 268 S.E.2d 105 (1980), the court noted that the rule in § 17-13-30 must be interpreted in light of S.C.Code Ann. § 23-13-60 (1989), *368 which provides that su 1999In Fradella v. Town of Mount Pleasant, 325 S.C. 469 , 482 S.E.2d 53 (Ct.App.1997), this Court explained: South Carolina Code Ann. § 17-13-30 (1985), states that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs “may arrest without warrant any and all persons who, within [the officers’] view, violate any of the criminal laws ... if such arrest be made at the time of such violation of law or immediately thereafter.” However, in State v. Martin, 275 S.C. 141 , 268 S.E.2d 105 (1980), the court noted that the rule in § 17-13-30 must be interpreted in light of S.C.Code Ann. § 23-13-60 (1989), *368 which provides that su | 1 | 2 |
Fradella v. Town of Mount Pleasantgreen2 sentences1999In Fradella v. Town of Mount Pleasant, 325 S.C. 469 , 482 S.E.2d 53 (Ct.App.1997), this Court explained: South Carolina Code Ann. § 17-13-30 (1985), states that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs “may arrest without warrant any and all persons who, within [the officers’] view, violate any of the criminal laws ... if such arrest be made at the time of such violation of law or immediately thereafter.” However, in State v. Martin, 275 S.C. 141 , 268 S.E.2d 105 (1980), the court noted that the rule in § 17-13-30 must be interpreted in light of S.C.Code Ann. § 23-13-60 (1989), *368 which provides that su 1999In Fradella v. Town of Mount Pleasant, 325 S.C. 469 , 482 S.E.2d 53 (Ct.App.1997), this Court explained: South Carolina Code Ann. § 17-13-30 (1985), states that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs “may arrest without warrant any and all persons who, within [the officers’] view, violate any of the criminal laws ... if such arrest be made at the time of such violation of law or immediately thereafter.” However, in State v. Martin, 275 S.C. 141 , 268 S.E.2d 105 (1980), the court noted that the rule in § 17-13-30 must be interpreted in light of S.C.Code Ann. § 23-13-60 (1989), *368 which provides that su | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goodwin v. Landquest Development, LLC
green
2 sentences2026The court noted that the rule's tolling provision "would not be necessary if striking the case pursuant to Rule 40(j) were not the equivalent of a dismissal." Id. at 631 , 779 S.E.2d at 831 . 2026The court noted that the rule's tolling provision "would not be necessary if striking the case pursuant to Rule 40(j) were not the equivalent of a dismissal." Id. at 631 , 779 S.E.2d at 831 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Byrd v. Irmo High School
green
2 sentences2005Byrd , 321 S.C. at 431 , 468 S.E.2d at 864 . 2005Byrd , 321 S.C. at 431 , 468 S.E.2d at 864 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Glasgow v. Glasgow
green
2 sentences1999The Court noted the rule "a life estate may not be reserved to, or excepted in favor of, a stranger is long-established and logical." Id. at 331 , 70 S.E.2d at 435 . 1999The Court noted the rule "a life estate may not be reserved to, or excepted in favor of, a stranger is long-established and logical." Id. at 331 , 70 S.E.2d at 435 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Harmon v. Harmon
green
1 sentence1987Id. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.