Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1959–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re RMJgreen2 sentences1983Id. 455 U.S. at 200-01, 102 S.Ct. at 936 . 1983Id. 455 U.S. at 200-01, 102 S.Ct. at 936 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Grampregreen1 sentence2010This court noted that the exception “ ‘reflects] legislative determinations concerning specific conduct that is eligible for increased punishment even when committed as part of the same behavioral incident.’ ” Grampre, 766 N.W.2d at 351 (alteration in original) (quoting Jones, 745 N.W.2d at 850 ). | 1 | 1 |
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.green1 sentence2005But this court noted an exception to the general rule in Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc., 450 N.W.2d 137, 142 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Mar. 16, 1990). | 1 | 1 |
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indiansred2 sentences1999See id. at 210 , 107 S.Ct. 1083 . 1999See id. at 210 , 107 S.Ct. 1083 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McBride v. Peoplegreen2 sentences1959But cf. McBride v. People, 126 Colo. 277 , 248 P. (2d) 725 . 20 In McBride v. People, 126 Colo. 277, 284 , 248 P. (2d) 725, 729 , the court noted that a violation of the “confidence game” statute was not an offense at common law, suggesting a difference between the “confidence game” and “swindling” statutes. 1959But cf. McBride v. People, 126 Colo. 277 , 248 P. (2d) 725 . 20 In McBride v. People, 126 Colo. 277, 284 , 248 P. (2d) 725, 729 , the court noted that a violation of the “confidence game” statute was not an offense at common law, suggesting a difference between the “confidence game” and “swindling” statutes. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
green
2 sentences1983And the Court noted that a warning or disclaimer might be appropriately required, even in the context of advertising as to price, in order to dissipate the possibility of consumer confusion or deception. "[T]he bar retains the power to correct omissions that have the effect of presenting an inaccurate picture, [although] the preferred remedy is more disclosure, rather than less." Id. , at 375 [ 97 S.Ct. at 2704 ]. 1983And the Court noted that a warning or disclaimer might be appropriately required, even in the context of advertising as to price, in order to dissipate the possibility of consumer confusion or deception. “[T]he bar retains the power to correct omissions that have the effect of presenting an inaccurate picture, [although] the preferred remedy is more disclosure, rather than less.” Id., at 375 [ 97 S.Ct. at 2704 ]. | 2 | 1983–1983 |
County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.
green
1 sentence2014Corp., which held that landowners are entitled to severance damages in partial takings cases, but such damages “must arise from the changes in the land actually taken, and not merely from the impact from the construction project as a whole.” 566 N.W.2d at 334 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence2010This court noted that the exception “ ‘reflects] legislative determinations concerning specific conduct that is eligible for increased punishment even when committed as part of the same behavioral incident.’ ” Grampre, 766 N.W.2d at 351 (alteration in original) (quoting Jones, 745 N.W.2d at 850 ). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
United States v. Frederick W. Norton
green
1 sentence2010Id. at 525 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Tibbetts
green
1 sentence2002Id. at 500 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
green
2 sentences1993Id. at 453 , 110 S.Ct. at 2487 . 1993Id. at 453 , 110 S.Ct. at 2487 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Idaho v. Wright
red
1 sentence1993The Court noted that these factors were not exclusive, declined to endorse a mechanical test, and emphasized that any test which was used should be designed to determine “whether the child declarant was particularly likely to be telling the truth when the statement was made.” Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Curryer v. Merrill
green
2 sentences1993Id. at 6 . 1993Id. at 6 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority
green
2 sentences1987In Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N.W.2d 656 (1959), the court noted that factors other than financial return niay be relevant in determining whether competitive bidding procedures must be followed. 1987In Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N.W.2d 656 (1959), the court noted that factors other than financial return niay be relevant in determining whether competitive bidding procedures must be followed. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences1984Similarly, in Gates , the court noted that the standard for determinations of probable cause is not susceptible to reduction to a “neat set of legal rules,” but is a “fluid concept.” — U.S. at -, 103 S.Ct. at 2328 . 1984Similarly, in Gates , the court noted that the standard for determinations of probable cause is not susceptible to reduction to a "neat set of legal rules," but is a "fluid concept." ___ U.S. at ___, 103 S.Ct. at 2328 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Archie W. Brawner
green
2 sentences1982The court noted that the doctrine "has nothing to do with `diminishing' responsibility of a defendant because of his impaired mental condition, but rather with determining whether the defendant had the mental state that must be proved as to all defendants." Id. (footnote omitted). 1982The court noted that the doctrine “has nothing to do with ‘diminishing’ responsibility of a defendant because of his impaired mental condition, but rather with determining whether the defendant had the mental state that must be proved as to all defendants.” Id. (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Otey v. Common Council of City of Milwaukee
green
1 sentence1972Otey v. Common Council of City of Milwaukee, 281 F.Supp. 264 (E.D. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1959See, also, 2 Wharton, Criminal Law and Procedure, § 619. 21 See, e. g., State v. Smith, 82 Minn. 342 , 85 N. W. 12 . 1959See, also, 2 Wharton, Criminal Law and Procedure, § 619. 21 See, e. g., State v. Smith, 82 Minn. 342 , 85 N. W. 12 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.