Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Andrews v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Hughes [v. State ], [ 2003 WY 35 ,] ¶ 11, [ 65 P.3d 378, 382 (Wyo.2003) ] (citing Andrews v. State, 2002 WY 28, ¶ 18 , 40 P.3d 708, ¶ 18 (Wyo.2002)). 2008Hughes [v. State ], [ 2003 WY 35 ,] ¶ 11, [ 65 P.3d 378, 382 (Wyo.2003) ] (citing Andrews v. State, 2002 WY 28, ¶ 18 , 40 P.3d 708, ¶ 18 (Wyo.2002)). | 5 | 5 |
Hughes v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Hughes [v. State ], [ 2003 WY 35 ,] ¶ 11, [ 65 P.3d 378, 382 (Wyo.2003) ] (citing Andrews v. State, 2002 WY 28, ¶ 18 , 40 P.3d 708, ¶ 18 (Wyo.2002)). 2008Hughes [v. State ], [ 2003 WY 35 ,] ¶ 11, [ 65 P.3d 378, 382 (Wyo.2003) ] (citing Andrews v. State, 2002 WY 28, ¶ 18 , 40 P.3d 708, ¶ 18 (Wyo.2002)). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Javorina v. State
green
1 sentence2007Hughes[v. State, 2008 WY 35 , 65 P.3d 378 (Wyo. 2003)], T 11 (citing Andrews v. State, 2002 WY 28, 118 , 40 P.3d 708, 118 (Wyo. 2002)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Fitzgerald v. State
green
2 sentences1983Fitzgerald v. State, Wyo.1979, 601 P.2d 1015 . 1983Fitzgerald v. State, Wyo. 1979, 601 P.2d 1015 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Reeves v. State
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin 'my inquiry with the proposition that “the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that ‘searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S., 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Chambers v. Maroney
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Simmons v. West Haven Housing Authority
green
2 sentences1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin my inquiry with the proposition that "the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that `searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.'" Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed. 1979Reeves, supra. The contested search was made without a warrant, and I therefore begin 'my inquiry with the proposition that “the most basic constitutional rule in this area is that ‘searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (the plain-view exception); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S., 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Procunier v. Martinez
red
2 sentences1978Procunier v. Martinez, 1974, 416 U.S. 396 , 94 S.Ct. 1800 , 40 L.Ed.2d 224 . 1978Procunier v. Martinez, 1974, 416 U.S. 396 , 94 S.Ct. 1800 , 40 L.Ed.2d 224 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.