56 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Detroit Marine Engineering v. McReegreen2 sentences2018So long as all the instructions read together adequately and properly instruct the jury on the issues, an individual instruction given to the jury will not constitute reversible error." Detroit Marine Eng'g v. McRee , 510 So.2d 462 , 467-68 (Miss. 1987). 2002So long as all the instructions read together adequately and properly instruct the jury on the issues, an individual instruction given to the jury will not constitute reversible error." Detroit Marine Eng'g v. McRee , 510 So.2d 462 , 467-68 (Miss. 1987). | 10 | 12 |
Catchings v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Catchings v. State, 684 So.2d 591, 599 (Miss.1996). ¶ 10. 1999Catchings v. State, 684 So.2d 591, 599 (Miss.1996). | 8 | 8 |
Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc.green2 sentences2004In Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthy, 829 So.2d 1, 22 (Miss.2002), this Court stated: As we have said, "on appellate review, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole." Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40-41 (1989). 2002In Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthy, 829 So.2d 1, 22 (Miss. 2002), this Court stated: As we have said, "on appellate review, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole." Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40-41 (1989). | 7 | 7 |
Collins v. Stategreen2 sentences2001We have held numerous times that "[t]his Court will not reverse for denial of an individual instruction when the jury has been instructed properly and fully by the granting of all the instructions." Id. (quoting Collins v. State, 594 So.2d 29, 35 (Miss.1992)). 1999We have held numerous times that "[t]his Court will not reverse for denial of an individual instruction when the jury has been instructed properly and fully by the granting of all the instructions." Id. (quoting Collins v. State, 594 So. 2d 29, 35 (Miss. 1992)). | 4 | 4 |
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Ladnergreen2 sentences1998Pittman v. Ladner, 512 So.2d 1271, 1277 (Miss.1987), in which this Court held: ... [I]n litigation between the state and an individual, where the operative statute has been repealed or amended and the litigation arises out of a pre-repeal, pre-amendment transaction or occurrence, the individual may claim and be given the benefit of the prior law in effect at the operative time where he regards it as more favorable to him. 1997Pittman v. Ladner, 512 So.2d 1271 (Miss. 1987), "in litigation between the state and an individual, where the operative statute has been repealed or amended and the litigation arises out of a pre-repeal, pre-amendment transaction or occurrence, the individual may claim and be given the benefit of the prior law in effect at the operative time where he regards it more favorable to him. " Id. at 1277 (emphasis added). | 4 | 4 |
Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthygreen2 sentences2004In Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthy, 829 So.2d 1, 22 (Miss.2002), this Court stated: As we have said, "on appellate review, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole." Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40-41 (1989). 2002In Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthy, 829 So.2d 1, 22 (Miss. 2002), this Court stated: As we have said, "on appellate review, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole." Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40-41 (1989). | 3 | 3 |
Bullock v. Stategreen2 sentences1988And finally, in Bullock v. State, 391 So.2d 601 (Miss. 1980), this Court denied funds to employ a criminal investigator where, The appellant did not outline any specific costs for such an investigator, and did not indicate to the court in any specific terms as to the purposes and value of such an individual to the defense. 1988And finally, in Bullock v. State, 391 So.2d 601 (Miss. 1980), this Court denied funds to employ a criminal investigator where, The appellant did not outline any specific costs for such an investigator, and did not indicate to the court in any specific terms as to the purposes and value of such an individual to the defense. | 2 | 4 |
Orchard v. Covelligreen2 sentences2014See Fought, 543 So.2d at 171 (“ ‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty ....’”) (quoting Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F.Supp. 1548, 1557 (W.D.Pa.1984), aff'd 802 F.2d 448 (3d Cir.1986)). 2011See Fought, 543 So. 2d at 171 (“‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty . . . .’”) (quoting Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F. Supp. 1548, 1557 (W.D. | 2 | 2 |
Fought v. Morrisgreen2 sentences2014See Fought, 543 So.2d at 171 (“ ‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty ....’”) (quoting Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F.Supp. 1548, 1557 (W.D.Pa.1984), aff'd 802 F.2d 448 (3d Cir.1986)). 2011See Fought, 543 So. 2d at 171 (“‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty . . . .’”) (quoting Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F. Supp. 1548, 1557 (W.D. | 2 | 2 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Brown v. State, 890 So.2d 901, 919 (Miss.2004) (“On review of jury instructions, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole.”). 2007See Brown v. State, 890 So. 2d 901, 919 (Miss. 2004) (“On review of jury instructions, we do not isolate the individual instruction attacked, but rather we read all of the instructions as a whole.”). | 2 | 2 |
TXG Intrastate Pipeline Co. v. Grossnicklegreen2 sentences2008As River Region has correctly stated, "[u]nder Mississippi law, plaintiffs bear the burden of going forward with sufficient evidence to prove their damages by a preponderance of the evidence." TXG Intrastate Pipeline Co. v. Grossnickle, 716 So.2d 991, 1016 (Miss.1997). 2005As River Region has correctly stated, “[u]nder Mississippi law, plaintiffs bear the burden of going forward with sufficient evidence to prove their damages by a preponderance of the evidence.” TXG Intrastate Pipeline Co. v. Grossnickle, 716 So. 2d 991, 1016 (Miss. 1997). | 2 | 2 |
Coleman v. Stategreen2 sentences2002So long as all the instructions read together adequately and properly instruct the jury on the issues, an individual instruction given to the jury will not constitute reversible error.'" Coleman v. State, 804 So.2d 1032, 1037 (Miss.2002) (quoting Detroit Marine Eng'g v. McRee, 510 So.2d 462, 467-68 (Miss.1987)). 1999So long as all the instructions read together adequately and properly instruct the jury on the issues, an individual instruction given to the jury will not constitute reversible error.'" Coleman v. State, 804 So.2d 1032, 1037 (Miss. 2002) (quoting Detroit Marine Eng'g v. McRee, 510 So.2d 462, 467-68 (Miss. 1987)). | 2 | 2 |
Brothers v. Winsteadgreen1 sentence2018See, e.g. , Brothers v. Winstead , 129 So.3d 906 , 923-24 (Miss. 2014) (recognizing an LLC member had an individual claim for legal damages for the breach of fiduciary duties owed him, which was separate from a claim of breach of fiduciary duties owed to the company). | 1 | 1 |
Pennsylvania State Police, Appeal Ofgreen1 sentence2014See Fought, 543 So.2d at 171 (“ ‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty ....’”) (quoting Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F.Supp. 1548, 1557 (W.D.Pa.1984), aff'd 802 F.2d 448 (3d Cir.1986)). | 1 | 1 |
Bush v. Statered1 sentence2010In looking at the sufficiency of the evidence, the ultimate question is whether, “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss.2005) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 315 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). ¶ 14. | 1 | 1 |
Conner v. Statered1 sentence1995We find that although Instruction D-4 was an acceptable instruction, Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1257 (Miss.1993), we again state that we will not reverse for denial of an individual instruction when the jury has been instructed properly and fully by the granting of all the instructions. | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Blanksgreen1 sentence1989Defects in specific instructions do not require reversal where all instructions taken as a whole fairly although not perfectly announce the applicable primary rules of law. [3] Allen v. Blanks, 384 So.2d 63, 65 (Miss. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Tubbs v. Stategreen1 sentence1988Bullock v. State, 391 So.2d 601, 607 (Miss. 1980); Tubbs v. State, 402 So.2d 830, 836 (Miss. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Griffingreen1 sentence1985Jackson v. Griffin, 390 So.2d 287, 290 (Miss. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Garcia v. Coast Elec. Power Ass'n
green
2 sentences1999Detroit Marine Engineering v. McRee, 510 So.2d 462, 467 (Miss.1987); Garcia v. Coast Electric Power Ass'n, 493 So.2d 380 (Miss.1986); Miss. 1996Detroit Marine Engineering v. McRee, 510 So. 2d 462, 467 (Miss.1987); Garcia v. Coast Electric Power Ass'n, 493 So. 2d 380 (Miss. 1986); Miss. | 4 | 1987–1999 |
Heidel v. State
green
2 sentences2002Under Heidel v. State, 587 So.2d 835 (Miss.1991), a court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence. 2002Under Heidel v. State , 587 So.2d 835 (Miss. 1991), a court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence. | 2 | 1997–2002 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2001We have held numerous times that "[t]his Court will not reverse for denial of an individual instruction when the jury has been instructed properly and fully by the granting of all the instructions." Id. (quoting Collins v. State, 594 So.2d 29, 35 (Miss.1992)). 1999We have held numerous times that "[t]his Court will not reverse for denial of an individual instruction when the jury has been instructed properly and fully by the granting of all the instructions." Id. (quoting Collins v. State, 594 So. 2d 29, 35 (Miss. 1992)). | 2 | 1999–2001 |
Dowdy v. Jordan
green
2 sentences1996The court in Dowdy further stated that "the validity of the claim standing alone is irrelevant when a breach of fiduciary duty is found, and the fact that the ... [guardian's joint tenancy] predated the inception of the trust does not relieve him of fiduciary duties in regard to the subject matter of the trust to which he asserts an individual claim." Id. at 209 , 196 S.E.2d 160 . 1996The court in Dowdy further stated that "the validity of the claim standing alone is irrelevant when a breach of fiduciary duty is found, and the fact that the ... [guardian's joint tenancy] predated the inception of the trust does not relieve him of fiduciary duties in regard to the subject matter of the trust to which he asserts an individual claim." Id. at 209 , 196 S.E.2d 160 . | 2 | 1992–1996 |
McLendon v. State
green
1 sentence2025McLendon, 945 So. 2d at 379 (citing Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Brown v. Texas
green
1 sentence2025McLendon, 945 So. 2d at 379 (citing Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Sadler v. State
green
1 sentence2018Furthermore, "a trial judge is not required to give instructions covered by other instructions, although the language may differ." Sadler v. State , 407 So.2d 95 , 98 (Miss. 1981). ¶ 36. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2010In looking at the sufficiency of the evidence, the ultimate question is whether, “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss.2005) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 315 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). ¶ 14. 2010In looking at the sufficiency of the evidence, the ultimate question is whether, “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss.2005) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 315 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). ¶ 14. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McVeay v. State
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 1390 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Griffin v. State
green
1 sentence1998Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542 (Miss.1990). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Bainch
green
2 sentences1974In State v. Bainch, 109 Ariz. 77 , 505 P.2d 248 (1973), the Arizona Court stated: The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer to be considered a restraint on the suspect's liberty. 1974In State v. Bainch, 109 Ariz. 77 , 505 P.2d 248 (1973), the Arizona Court stated: The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer to be considered a restraint on the suspect's liberty. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.